HelF, a suppressor of RNAi mediated gene silencing in Dictyostelium discoideum

RNA interference (RNAi) is a recently discovered process, in which double stranded RNA (dsRNA) triggers the homology-dependant degradation of cognate messenger RNA (mRNA). In a search for new components of the RNAi machinery in Dictyostelium, a new gene was identified, which was called helF. HelF is a putative RNA helicase, which shows a high homology to the helicase domain of Dicer, to the helicase domain of Dictyostelium RdRP and to the C. elegans gene drh-1, that codes for a dicer related DExH-box RNA helicase, which is required for RNAi. The aim of the present Ph.D. work was to investigate the role of HelF in PTGS, either induced by RNAi or asRNA. A genomic disruption of the helF gene was performed, which resulted in a distinct mutant morphology in late development. The cellular localization of the protein was elucidated by creating a HelF-GFP fusion protein, which was found to be localized in speckles in the nucleus. The involvement of HelF in the RNAi mechanism was studied. For this purpose, RNAi was induced by transformation of RNAi hairpin constructs against four endogenous genes in wild type and HelF- cells. The silencing efficiency was strongly enhanced in the HelF K.O. strain in comparison with the wild type. One gene, which could not be silenced in the wild type background, was successfully silenced in HelF-. When the helF gene was disrupted in a secondary transformation in a non-silenced strain, the silencing efficiency was strongly improved, a phenomenon named here “retrosilencing”. Transcriptional run-on experiments revealed that the enhanced gene silencing in HelF- was a posttranscriptional event, and that the silencing efficiency depended on the transcription levels of hairpin RNAs. In HelF-, the threshold level of hairpin transcription required for efficient silencing was dramatically lowered. The RNAi-mediated silencing was accompanied by the production of siRNAs; however, their amount did not depend on the level of hairpin transcription. These results indicated that HelF is a natural suppressor of RNAi in Dictyostelium. In contrast, asRNA mediated gene silencing was not enhanced in the HelF K.O, as shown for three tested genes. These results confirmed previous observations (H. Martens and W. Nellen, unpublished) that although similar, RNAi and asRNA mediated gene silencing mechanisms differ in their requirements for specific proteins. In order to characterize the function of the HelF protein on a molecular level and to study its interactions with other RNAi components, in vitro experiments were performed. Besides the DEAH-helicase domain, HelF contains a double-stranded RNA binding domain (dsRBD) at its N-terminus, which showed high similarity to the dsRBD domain of Dicer A from Dictyostelium. The ability of the recombinant dsRBDs from HelF and Dicer A to bind dsRNA was examined and compared. It was shown by gel-shift assays that both HelF-dsRBD and Dicer-dsRBD could bind directly to long dsRNAs. However, HelF-dsRBD bound more efficiently to dsRNA with imperfect matches than to perfect dsRNA. Both dsRBDs bound specifically to a pre-miRNA substrate (pre-let-7). The results suggested that most probably there were two binding sites for the proteins on the pre-miRNA substrate. Moreover, it was shown that HelF-dsRBD and Dicer-dsRBD have siRNA-binding activity. The affinities of the two dsRBDs to the pre-let-7 substrate were also examined by plasmon surface resonance analyses, which revealed a 9-fold higher binding affinity of the Dicer-dsRBD to pre-let-7 compared to that of the HelF-dsRBD. The binding of HelF-dsRBD to the pre-let-7 was impaired in the presence of Mg2+, while the Dicer-dsRBD interaction with pre-let-7 was not influenced by the presence of Mg2+. The results obtained in this thesis can be used to postulate a model for HelF function. In this, HelF acts as a nuclear suppressor of RNAi in wild type cells by recognition and binding of dsRNA substrates. The protein might act as a surveillance system to avoid RNAi initiation by fortuitous dsRNA formation or low abundance of dsRNA trigger. If the protein acts as an RNA helicase, it could unwind fold-back structures in the nucleus and thus lead to decreased RNAi efficiency. A knock-out of HelF would result in initiation of the RNAi pathway even by low levels of dsRNA. The exact molecular function of the protein in the RNAi mechanism still has to be elucidated. RNA interferenz (RNAi) ist ein in jüngster Zeit entdeckter Mechanismus, bei dem doppelsträngige RNA Moleküle (dsRNA) eine Homologie-abhängige Degradation einer verwandten messenger-RNA (mRNA) auslösen. Auf der Suche nach neuen Komponenten der RNAi-Maschinerie in Dictyostelium konnte ein neues Gen (helF) identifiziert werden. HelF ist eine putative RNA-Helikase mit einer hohen Homologie zur Helikasedomäne der bekannten Dicerproteine, der Helikasedomäne der Dictyostelium RdRP und zu dem C. elegans Gen drh-1, welches für eine Dicer-bezogene DExH-box RNA Helikase codiert, die am RNAi-Mechanismus beteiligt ist. Das Ziel dieser Arbeit war es, die Funktion von HelF im Zusammenhang des RNAi oder asRNA induzierten PTGS zu untersuchen. Es wurde eine Unterbrechung des helF-Gens auf genomischer Ebene (K.O.) vorgenommen, was bei den Mutanten zu einer veränderten Morphologie in der späten Entwicklung führte. Die Lokalisation des Proteins in der Zelle konnte mit Hilfe einer GFP-Fusion analysiert werden und kleinen Bereichen innerhalb des Nukleus zugewiesen werden. Im Weiteren wurde der Einfluss von HelF auf den RNAi-Mechanismus untersucht. Zu diesem Zweck wurde RNAi durch Einbringen von RNAi Hairpin-Konstrukten gegen vier endogene Gene im Wiltypstamm und der HelF--Mutante induziert. Im Vergleich zum Wildtypstamm konnte im HelF--Mutantenstamm eine stark erhöhte „Silencing“-Effizienz nachgewiesen werden. Ein Gen, welches nach RNAi Initiation im Wildtypstamm unverändert blieb, konnte im HelF--Mutantenstamm erfolgreich stillgelegt werden. Durch sekundäres Einführen einer Gendisruption im helF-Locus in einen Stamm, in welchem ein Gen nicht stillgelegt werden konnte, wurde die Effizienz des Stilllegens deutlich erhöht. Dieses Phänomen wurde hier erstmals als „Retrosilencing“ beschrieben. Mit Hilfe von transkriptionellen run-on Experimenten konnte belegt werden, dass es sich bei dieser erhöhten Stilllegungseffizienz um ein posttranskriptionelles Ereignis handelte, wobei die Stillegungseffizienz von der Transkriptionsstärke der Hairpin RNAs abhängt. Für die HelF--Mutanten konnte gezeigt werden, dass der Schwellenwert zum Auslösen eines effizienten Stillegens dramatisch abgesenkt war. Obwohl die RNAi-vermittelte Genstilllegung immer mit der Produktion von siRNAs einhergeht, war die Menge der siRNAs nicht abhängig von dem Expressionsniveau des Hairpin-Konstruktes. Diese Ergebnisse legen nahe, dass es sich bei der HelF um einen natürlichen Suppressor des RNAi-Mechanismus in Dictyostelium handelt. Im Gegensatz hierzu war die as-vermittelte Stilllegung von drei untersuchten Genen im HelF-K.O. im Vergleich zum Wildyp unverändert. Diese Ergebnisse bestätigten frühere Beobachtungen (H. Martens und W. Nellen, unveröffentlicht), wonach die Mechanismen für RNAi und asRNA-vermittelte Genstilllegung unterschiedliche spezifische Proteine benötigen. Um die Funktion des HelF-Proteins auf der molekularen Ebene genauer zu charakterisieren und die Interaktion mit anderen RNAi-Komponenten zu untersuchen, wurden in vitro Versuche durchgeführt. Das HelF-Protein enthält, neben der DEAH-Helikase-Domäne eine N-terminale Doppelstrang RNA bindende Domäne (dsRBD) mit einer hohen Ähnlichkeit zu der dsRBD des Dicer A aus Dictyostelium. Die dsRNA-Bindungsaktivität der beiden dsRBDs aus HelF und Dicer A wurde analysiert und verglichen. Es konnte mithilfe von Gel-Retardationsanalysen gezeigt werden, dass sowohl HelF-dsRBD als auch Dicer-dsRBD direkt an lange dsRNAs binden können. Hierbei zeigte sich, dass die HelF-dsRBD eine höhere Affinität zu einem imperfekten RNA-Doppelstrang besitzt, als zu einer perfekt gepaarten dsRNA. Für beide dsRBDs konnte eine spezifische Bindung an ein pre-miRNA Substrat nachgewiesen werden (pre-let-7). Dieses Ergebnis legt nah, dass es zwei Bindestellen für die Proteine auf dem pre-miRNA Substrat gibt. Überdies hinaus konnte gezeigt werden, dass die dsRBDs beider Proteine eine siRNA bindende Aktivität besitzen. Die Affinität beider dsRBDs an das pre-let-7 Substrat wurde weiterhin mit Hilfe der Plasmon Oberflächen Resonanz untersucht. Hierbei konnte eine 9-fach höhere Bindeaffinität der Dicer-dsRBD im Vergleich zur HelF-dsRBD nachgewiesen werden. Während die Bindung der HelF-dsRBD an das pre-let-7 durch die Anwesenheit von Mg2+ beeinträchtigt war, zeigte sich kein Einfluß von Mg2+ auf das Bindeverhalten der Dicer-dsRBD. Mit Hilfe der in dieser Arbeit gewonnen Ergebnisse lässt sich ein Model für die Funktion von HelF postulieren. In diesem Model wirkt HelF durch Erkennen und Binden von dsRNA Substraten als Suppressor von der RNAi im Kern. Das Protein kann als Überwachungsystem gegen eine irrtümliche Auslösung von RNAi wirken, die durch zufällige dsRNA Faltungen oder eine zu geringe Häufigkeit der siRNAs hervorgerufen sein könnte. Falls das Protein eine Helikase-Aktivität besitzt, könnte es rückgefaltete RNA Strukturen im Kern auflösen, was sich in einer verringerten RNAi-Effizienz wiederspiegelt. Durch Ausschalten des helF-Gens würde nach diesem Modell eine erfolgreiche Auslösung von RNAi schon bei sehr geringer Mengen an dsRNA möglich werden. Das Modell erlaubt, die exakte molekulare Funktion des HelF-Proteins im RNAi-Mechanismus weiter zu untersuchen.

Heterochromatin und epigenetische Kontrolle der Centromere in Dictyostelium discoideum

Heterochromatin Protein 1 (HP1) is an evolutionarily conserved protein required for formation of a higher-order chromatin structures and epigenetic gene silencing. The objective of the present work was to functionally characterise HP1-like proteins in Dictyostelium discoideum, and to investigate their function in heterochromatin formation and transcriptional gene silencing. The Dictyostelium genome encodes three HP1-like proteins (hcpA, hcpB, hcpC), from which only two, hcpA and hcpB, but not hcpC were found to be expressed during vegetative growth and under developmental conditions. Therefore, hcpC, albeit no obvious pseudogene, was excluded from this study. Both HcpA and HcpB show the characteristic conserved domain structure of HP1 proteins, consisting of an N-terminal chromo domain and a C-terminal chromo shadow domain, which are separated by a hinge. Both proteins show all biochemical activities characteristic for HP1 proteins, such as homo- and heterodimerisation in vitro and in vivo, and DNA binding activtity. HcpA furthermore seems to bind to K9-methylated histone H3 in vitro. The proteins thus appear to be structurally and functionally conserved in Dictyostelium. The proteins display largely identical subnuclear distribution in several minor foci and concentration in one major cluster at the nuclear periphery. The localisation of this cluster adjacent to the nucleus-associated centrosome and its mitotic behaviour strongly suggest that it represents centromeric heterochromatin. Furthermore, it is characterised by histone H3 lysine-9 dimethylation (H3K9me2), which is another hallmark of Dictyostelium heterochromatin. Therefore, one important aspect of the work was to characterise the so-far largely unknown structural organisation of centromeric heterochromatin. The Dictyostelium homologue of inner centromere protein INCENP (DdINCENP), co-localized with both HcpA and H3K9me2 during metaphase, providing further evidence that H3K9me2 and HcpA/B localisation represent centromeric heterochromatin. Chromatin immunoprecipitation (ChIP) showed that two types of high-copy number retrotransposons (DIRS-1 and skipper), which form large irregular arrays at the chromosome ends, which are thought to contain the Dictyostelium centromeres, are characterised by H3K9me2. Neither overexpression of full-length HcpA or HcpB, nor deletion of single Hcp isoforms resulted in changes in retrotransposon transcript levels. However, overexpression of a C-terminally truncated HcpA protein, assumed to display a dominant negative effect, lead to an increase in skipper retrotransposon transcript levels. Furthermore, overexpression of this protein lead to severe growth defects in axenic suspension culture and reduced cell viability. In order to elucidate the proteins functions in centromeric heterochromatin formation, gene knock-outs for both hcpA and hcpB were generated. Both genes could be successfully targeted and disrupted by homologous recombination. Surprisingly, the degree of functional redundancy of the two isoforms was, although not unexpected, very high. Both single knock-out mutants did not show any obvious phenotypes under standard laboratory conditions and only deletion of hcpA resulted in subtle growth phenotypes when grown at low temperature. All attempts to generate a double null mutant failed. However, both endogenous genes could be disrupted in cells in which a rescue construct that ectopically expressed one of the isoforms either with N-terminal 6xHis- or GFP-tag had been introduced. The data imply that the presence of at least one Hcp isoform is essential in Dictyostelium. The lethality of the hcpA/hcpB double mutant thus greatly hampered functional analysis of the two genes. However, the experiment provided genetic evidence that the GFP-HcpA fusion protein, because of its ability to compensate the loss of the endogenous HcpA protein, was a functional protein. The proteins displayed quantitative differences in dimerisation behaviour, which are conferred by the slightly different hinge and chromo shadow domains at the C-termini. Dimerisation preferences in increasing order were HcpA-HcpA << HcpA-HcpB << HcpB-HcpB. Overexpression of GFP-HcpA or a chimeric protein containing the HcpA C-terminus (GFP-HcpBNAC), but not overexpression of GFP-HcpB or GFP-HcpANBC, lead to increased frequencies of anaphase bridges in late mitotic cells, which are thought to be caused by telomere-telomere fusions. Chromatin targeting of the two proteins is achieved by at least two distinct mechanisms. The N-terminal chromo domain and hinge of the proteins are required for targeting to centromeric heterochromatin, while the C-terminal portion encoding the CSD is required for targeting to several other chromatin regions at the nuclear periphery that are characterised by H3K9me2. Targeting to centromeric heterochromatin likely involves direct binding to DNA. The Dictyostelium genome encodes for all subunits of the origin recognition complex (ORC), which is a possible upstream component of HP1 targeting to chromatin. Overexpression of GFP-tagged OrcB, the Dictyostelium Orc2 homologue, showed a distinct nuclear localisation that partially overlapped with the HcpA distribution. Furthermore, GFP-OrcB localized to the centrosome during the entire cell cycle, indicating an involvement in centrosome function. DnmA is the sole DNA methyltransferase in Dictyostelium required for all DNA(cytosine-)methylation. To test for its in vivo activity, two different cell lines were established that ectopically expressed DnmA-myc or DnmA-GFP. It was assumed that overexpression of these proteins might cause an increase in the 5-methyl-cytosine(5-mC)-levels in the genomic DNA due to genomic hypermethylation. Although DnmA-GFP showed preferential localisation in the nucleus, no changes in the 5-mC-levels in the genomic DNA could be detected by capillary electrophoresis.

Nuclear organisation and epigenetic regulation of gene expression in Dictyostelium discoideum

A series of vectors for the over-expression of tagged proteins in Dictyostelium were designed, constructed and tested. These vectors allow the addition of an N- or C-terminal tag (GFP, RFP, 3xFLAG, 3xHA, 6xMYC and TAP) with an optimized polylinker sequence and no additional amino acid residues at the N or C terminus. Different selectable markers (Blasticidin and gentamicin) are available as well as an extra chromosomal version; these allow copy number and thus expression level to be controlled, as well as allowing for more options with regard to complementation, co- and super-transformation. Finally, the vectors share standardized cloning sites, allowing a gene of interest to be easily transfered between the different versions of the vectors as experimental requirements evolve. The organisation and dynamics of the Dictyostelium nucleus during the cell cycle was investigated. The centromeric histone H3 (CenH3) variant serves to target the kinetochore to the centromeres and thus ensures correct chromosome segregation during mitosis and meiosis. A number of Dictyostelium histone H3-domain containing proteins as GFP-tagged fusions were expressed and it was found that one of them functions as CenH3 in this species. Like CenH3 from some other species, Dictyostelium CenH3 has an extended N-terminal domain with no similarity to any other known proteins. The targeting domain, comprising α-helix 2 and loop 1 of the histone fold is required for targeting CenH3 to centromeres. Compared to the targeting domain of other known and putative CenH3 species, Dictyostelium CenH3 has a shorter loop 1 region. The localisation of a variety of histone modifications and histone modifying enzymes was examined. Using fluorescence in situ hybridisation (FISH) and CenH3 chromatin-immunoprecipitation (ChIP) it was shown that the six telocentric centromeres contain all of the DIRS-1 and most of the DDT-A and skipper transposons. During interphase the centromeres remain attached to the centrosome resulting in a single CenH3 cluster which also contains the putative histone H3K9 methyltransferase SuvA, H3K9me3 and HP1 (heterochromatin protein 1). Except for the centromere cluster and a number of small foci at the nuclear periphery opposite the centromeres, the rest of the nucleus is largely devoid of transposons and heterochromatin associated histone modifications. At least some of the small foci correspond to the distal telomeres, suggesting that the chromosomes are organised in a Rabl-like manner. It was found that in contrast to metazoans, loading of CenH3 onto Dictyostelium centromeres occurs in late G2 phase. Transformation of Dictyostelium with vectors carrying the G418 resistance cassette typically results in the vector integrating into the genome in one or a few tandem arrays of approximately a hundred copies. In contrast, plasmids containing a Blasticidin resistance cassette integrate as single or a few copies. The behaviour of transgenes in the nucleus was examined by FISH, and it was found that low copy transgenes show apparently random distribution within the nucleus, while transgenes with more than approximately 10 copies cluster at or immediately adjacent to the centromeres in interphase cells regardless of the actual integration site along the chromosome. During mitosis the transgenes show centromere-like behaviour, and ChIP experiments show that transgenes contain the heterochromatin marker H3K9me2 and the centromeric histone variant H3v1. This clustering, and centromere-like behaviour was not observed on extrachromosomal transgenes, nor on a line where the transgene had integrated into the extrachromosomal rDNA palindrome. This suggests that it is the repetitive nature of the transgenes that causes the centromere-like behaviour. A Dictyostelium homolog of DET1, a protein largely restricted to multicellular eukaryotes where it has a role in developmental regulation was identified. As in other species Dictyostelium DET1 is nuclear localised. In ChIP experiments DET1 was found to bind the promoters of a number of developmentally regulated loci. In contrast to other species where it is an essential protein, loss of DET1 is not lethal in Dictyostelium, although viability is greatly reduced. Loss of DET1 results in delayed and abnormal development with enlarged aggregation territories. Mutant slugs displayed apparent cell type patterning with a bias towards pre-stalk cell types.

Analyzing Gene Centres with the Help of the Checklist Method – the Case of Syria

The present survey of species diversity of cultivated plants is the first for Syria. Some cultivated species will be added in the future, because due to the civil war in Syria, it was not possible to visit the country in the frame of the present work, as initially planned. Checklists proved to be a useful tool for overviewing the cultivated plants of selected areas and allow a characterization of the state of plant genetic resources of Syria. Syria has experienced several civilizations. Man settled in this productive land since ancient times and used its resources. However, such use has led to changes in vegetation and decline of wildlife through the country, in seashore areas, interior, mountains, and grassland. Plant domestication and growing started more than 10,000 years ago in West Asia. Since then, plentiful of economic plant species were present and used by man and his domesticated animals. Forming a part of the Fertile Crescent, where many of the world’s agricultural plants have evolved, Syria is extremely rich in agrobiodiversity. Wild progenitors of wheat and barley and wild relatives of many fruit trees such as almonds and pistachio as well as forage species are still found in marginal lands and less disturbed areas. These are threatened by a wide range of human activities, notably modern, extensive agriculture, overgrazing, overcutting and urban expansion. Syria is also considered as part of one of the main centres of origin, according to Vavilov, who had collected in Syria in 1926. The first expeditions to crop fields showed the exclusive nature of cultivated plants in Syria with a high number of endemic forms. Furthermore, Syria is a part of a biodiversity hotspot. Several studies have been performed to study agrobiodiversity in different parts of Syria, but usually on wild species. Many collections have been carried out; however, they focussed preferably on cereals and pulses, and particularly on wheat, like Vavilov’s expedition. Only 30 crops make up the major part of the conserved Syrian crop plant material in the genebank, indicating that most of the remaining 7,000 species of cultivated plants and many other valuable genetic resources species have only been included on a limited scale in the genebank collections. Although a small country (185,180 km2), Syria accommodates numerous ecosystems that allow for a large diversity of plant genetic resources for agriculture ranging from cold-requiring to subtropical crops to live and thrive. Only few references are available in this respect. The aim of the present study was to complete a checklist of Syria’s cultivated plants of agriculture and horticulture excluding plants only grown as ornamental or for forestry. Furthermore, plants taken for reforestation have not been included, if they do not have also agricultural or horticultural uses. Therefore, the inclusion of plants into the checklist follows the same principles as “Mansfeld’s Encyclopedia”. Main sources of information were published literature, floras of Syria, Lebanon and the Mediterranean, as well as Syrian printed sources in Arabic and/or English, reports from FAO on agricultural statistics in Syria, and data from ICARDA and Bioversity International. In addition, personal observations gathered during professional work in the General Commission for Scientific Agricultural Research (GCSAR) in Syria (since 1989) and participation in projects were taken into account. These were: (1) A project on “Conservation and Sustainable Use of Dry Land Agrobiodiversity in the Near East” with participation of Jordan, Lebanon, Syria, and the Palestinian Authority, focussing on landraces and wild relatives of barley, wheat, lentil, alliums, feed legumes, and fruit trees (1999–2005). (2) A project for vegetable landraces (1993–1995) in collaboration with the former International Plant Genetic Resources Institute and the UN Development Programme, in which 380 local vegetable accessions were evaluated. For medicinal plants and fruit trees I was in personal contact with departments of GCSAR and the Ministry of Agriculture and Agrarian Reform, as well as with private organizations. The resulting checklist was compared with the catalogues of crop plants of Italy and a checklist of cultivated plants of Iraq. The cultivated plant species are presented in alphabetical order according to their accepted scientific names. Each entry consists of a nomenclatural part, folk names, details of plant uses, the distribution in Syria (by provinces), a textual description, and references to literature. In total, 262 species belonging to 146 genera and 57 families were identified. Within-species (intraspecific) diversity is a significant measure of the biodiversity. Intraspecific diversity for wild plants has been and remains to be well studied, but for crop plants there are only few results. Mansfeld’s method is an actual logical contribution to such studies. Among the families, the following have the highest number of crop species: Leguminosae (34 spp.), Rosaceae (24), Gramineae (18), Labiatae (18), Compositae (14), Cruciferae (14), Cucurbitaceae (11), Rutaceae (10), Malvaceae (9), Alliaceae (7), and Anacardiaceae (7). The establishment of an effective programme for the maintenance of plant genetic resources in Syria started in the mid-1970s. This programme considered ex situ and in situ collection of the genetic resources of various field crops, fruit trees and vegetables. From a plant genetic resources viewpoint, it is clear that the homegarden is an important location for the cultivation of so-called neglected and underutilized species (neglected from a research side and underutilized from a larger economic side). Such species have so far not received much care from ecologists, botanists and agronomists, and they are considerably under-represented in genebanks.