Knowledge Building in Landscape Architecture

The objective of this study was to develop an internet-based seminar framework applicable for landscape architecture education. This process was accompanied by various aims. The basic expectation was to keep the main characteristics of landscape architecture education also in the online format. On top of that, four further objectives were anticipated: (1) training of competences for virtual team work, (2) fostering intercultural competence, (3) creation of equal opportunities for education through internet-based open access and (4) synergy effects and learning processes across institutional boundaries. This work started with the hypothesis that these four expected advantages would compensate for additional organisational efforts caused by the online delivery of the seminars and thus lead to a sustainable integration of this new learning mode into landscape architecture curricula. This rationale was followed by a presentation of four areas of knowledge to which the seminar development was directly related (1) landscape architecture as a subject and its pedagogy, (2) general learning theories, (3) developments in the ICT sector and (4) wider societal driving forces such as global citizenship and the increase of open educational resources. The research design took the shape of a pedagogical action research cycle. This approach was constructive: The author herself is teaching international landscape architecture students so that the model could directly be applied in practice. Seven online seminars were implemented in the period from 2008 to 2013 and this experience represents the core of this study. The seminars were conducted with varying themes while its pedagogy, organisation and the technological tools remained widely identical. The research design is further based on three levels of observation: (1) the seminar design on the basis of theory and methods from the learning sciences, in particular educational constructivism, (2) the seminar evaluation and (3) the evaluation of the seminars’ long term impact. The seminar model itself basically consists of four elements: (1) the taxonomy of learning objectives, (2) ICT tools and their application and pedagogy, (3) process models and (4) the case study framework. The seminar framework was followed by the presentation of the evaluation findings. The major findings of this study can be summed up as follows: Implementing online seminars across educational and national boundaries was possible both in term of organisation and technology. In particular, a high level of cultural diversity among the seminar participants has definitively been achieved. However, there were also obvious obstacles. These were primarily competing study commitments and incompatible schedules among the students attending from different academic programmes, partly even in different time zones. Both factors had negative impact on the individual and working group performances. With respect to the technical framework it can be concluded that the majority of the participants were able to use the tools either directly without any problem or after overcoming some smaller problems. Also the seminar wiki was intensively used for completing the seminar assignments. However, too less truly collaborative text production was observed which could be improved by changing the requirements for the collaborative task. Two different process models have been applied for guiding the collaboration of the small groups and both were in general successful. However, it needs to be said that even if the students were able to follow the collaborative task and to co-construct and compare case studies, most of them were not able to synthesize the knowledge they had compiled. This means that the area of consideration often remained on the level of the case and further reflections, generalisations and critique were largely missing. This shows that the seminar model needs to find better ways for triggering knowledge building and critical reflection. It was also suggested to have a more differentiated group building strategy in future seminars. A comparison of pre- and post seminar concept maps showed that an increase of factual and conceptual knowledge on the individual level was widely recognizable. Also the evaluation of the case studies (the major seminar output) revealed that the students have undergone developments of both the factual and the conceptual knowledge domain. Also their self-assessment with respect to individual learning development showed that the highest consensus was achieved in the field of subject-specific knowledge. The participants were much more doubtful with regard to the progress of generic competences such as analysis, communication and organisation. However, 50% of the participants confirmed that they perceived individual development on all competence areas the survey had asked for. Have the additional four targets been met? Concerning the competences for working in a virtual team it can be concluded that the vast majority was able to use the internet-based tools and to work with them in a target-oriented way. However, there were obvious differences regarding the intensity and activity of participation, both because of external and personal factors. A very positive aspect is the achievement of a high cultural diversity supporting the participants’ intercultural competence. Learning from group members was obviously a success factor for the working groups. Regarding the possibilities for better accessibility of educational opportunities it became clear that a significant number of participants were not able to go abroad during their studies because of financial or personal reasons. They confirmed that the online seminar was to some extent a compensation for not having been abroad for studying. Inter-institutional learning and synergy was achieved in so far that many teachers from different countries contributed with individual lectures. However, those teachers hardly ever followed more than one session. Therefore, the learning effect remained largely within the seminar learning group. Looking back at the research design it can be said that the pedagogical action research cycle was an appropriate and valuable approach allowing for strong interaction between theory and practice. However, some more external evaluation from peers in particular regarding the participants’ products would have been valuable.

Ontology merging with formal concept analysis

Ontologies have been established for knowledge sharing and are widely used as a means for conceptually structuring domains of interest. With the growing usage of ontologies, the problem of overlapping knowledge in a common domain becomes critical. In this short paper, we address two methods for merging ontologies based on Formal Concept Analysis: FCA-Merge and ONTEX. --- FCA-Merge is a method for merging ontologies following a bottom-up approach which offers a structural description of the merging process. The method is guided by application-specific instances of the given source ontologies. We apply techniques from natural language processing and formal concept analysis to derive a lattice of concepts as a structural result of FCA-Merge. The generated result is then explored and transformed into the merged ontology with human interaction. --- ONTEX is a method for systematically structuring the top-down level of ontologies. It is based on an interactive, top-down- knowledge acquisition process, which assures that the knowledge engineer considers all possible cases while avoiding redundant acquisition. The method is suited especially for creating/merging the top part(s) of the ontologies, where high accuracy is required, and for supporting the merging of two (or more) ontologies on that level.

Individuals' (re-)action in the face of global warming

Climate change remains a major challenge for today’s and future societies due to its immense impacts on human lives and the natural environment. This thesis investigates the extent to which individuals are willing and prepared to voluntarily contribute to climate protection and to adjust to new climatic conditions in order to cope with the consequences of climate change and reduce the severity of potential negative impacts. The thesis thereby combines research in the fields of the private provision of environmental public goods and adaptation to climate change, which is still widely unconnected in the existing literature. The six contributions of this thesis mainly focus on microeconometric analyses using data from international surveys in China, Germany, and the USA. The main findings are: (i) A substantial share of individuals is willing to voluntarily contribute to climate protection and to adapt to climatic change. The engagement in both strategies is positively interrelated at the individual level and the analyses reveal hardly any evidence that adaptation activities crowd out individuals’ incentives to engage in climate protection. (ii) The main determinants of individuals’ adaptation activities seem to be the subjective risk perception as well as socio-economic and socio-demographic characteristics like age, gender, education, and income, while their climate protection efforts are found to be broadly motivated by financial advantages from these activities and additional immaterial benefits. (iii) The empirical findings also suggest a significantly positive relationship between certain climate protection activities. Substitutions are found to occur merely if one measure is perceived to be more effective in providing climate protection or if individuals have high environmental preferences. (iv) This thesis further reveals a common understanding of a (normatively) fair burden-sharing in international climate policy across citizens in China, Germany, and the USA. The highest preferences are found for the accountability principle.

Ansätze einer akteursbasierten Innovationserklärung

Mit der vorliegenden Arbeit soll ein Beitrag zu einer (empirisch) gehaltvollen Mikrofundierung des Innovationsgeschehens im Rahmen einer evolutorischen Perspektive geleistet werden. Der verhaltensbezogene Schwerpunkt ist dabei, in unterschiedlichem Ausmaß, auf das Akteurs- und Innovationsmodell von Herbert Simon bzw. der Carnegie-School ausgerichtet und ergänzt, spezifiziert und erweitert dieses unter anderem um vertiefende Befunde der Kreativitäts- und Kognitionsforschung bzw. der Psychologie und der Vertrauensforschung sowie auch der modernen Innovationsforschung. zudem Bezug auf einen gesellschaftlich und ökonomisch relevanten Gegenstandsbereich der Innovation, die Umweltinnovation. Die Arbeit ist sowohl konzeptionell als auch empirisch ausgerichtet, zudem findet die Methode der Computersimulation in Form zweier Multi-Agentensysteme Anwendung. Als zusammenfassendes Ergebnis lässt sich im Allgemeinen festhalten, dass Innovationen als hochprekäre Prozesse anzusehen sind, welche auf einer Verbindung von spezifischen Akteursmerkmalen, Akteurskonstellationen und Umfeldbedingungen beruhen, Iterationsschleifen unterliegen (u.a. durch Lernen, Rückkoppelungen und Aufbau von Vertrauen) und Teil eines umfassenderen Handlungs- sowie (im Falle von Unternehmen) Organisationskontextes sind. Das Akteurshandeln und die Interaktion von Akteuren sind dabei Ausgangspunkt für Emergenzen auf der Meso- und der Makroebene. Die Ergebnisse der Analysen der in dieser Arbeit enthaltenen fünf Fachbeiträge zeigen im Speziellen, dass der Ansatz von Herbert Simon bzw. der Carnegie-School eine geeignete theoretische Grundlage zur Erfassung einer prozessorientierten Mikrofundierung des Gegenstandsbereichs der Innovation darstellt und – bei geeigneter Ergänzung und Adaption an den jeweiligen Erkenntnisgegenstand – eine differenzierte Betrachtung unterschiedlicher Arten von Innovationsprozessen und deren akteursbasierten Grundlagen sowohl auf der individuellen Ebene als auch auf Ebene von Unternehmen ermöglicht. Zudem wird deutlich, dass der Ansatz von Herbert Simon bzw. der Carnegie-School mit dem Initiationsmodell einen zusätzlichen Aspekt in die Diskussion einbringt, welcher bislang wenig Aufmerksamkeit fand, jedoch konstitutiv für eine ökonomische Perspektive ist: die Analyse der Bestimmungsgrößen (und des Prozesses) der Entscheidung zur Innovation. Denn auch wenn das Verständnis der Prozesse bzw. der Determinanten der Erstellung, Umsetzung und Diffusion von Innovationen von grundlegender Bedeutung ist, ist letztendlich die Frage, warum und unter welchen Umständen Akteure sich für Innovationen entscheiden, ein zentraler Kernbereich einer ökonomischen Betrachtung. Die Ergebnisse der Arbeit sind auch für die praktische Wirtschaftspolitik von Bedeutung, insbesondere mit Blick auf Innovationsprozesse und Umweltwirkungen.