Arbeitszeitflexibilisierung in der westdeutschen Metall- und Elektroindustrie und die Verbandsstrategien - Eine vergleichende Analyse der arbeitszeitpolitischen Strategien des Arbeitgeberverbandes Gesamtmetall und der Industriegewerkschaft Metall

Arbeitszeitpolitik und Arbeitszeitgestaltung haben seit dem Tarifkompromiss im Jahre 1984 in der Metall-, und Elektroindustrie in der politischen und wissenschaftlichen Diskussion einen immensen Bedeutungszuwachs erfahren. Die Forderungen nach einer flexibleren Arbeitszeitgestaltung haben zeitgleich sowohl aus der Globalisierungsdiskussion und der Debatte um die Wettbewerbsfähigkeit des "Wirtschaftsstandorts Deutschland" heraus wie auch aus beschäftigungspolitischen Gründen neuen Auftrieb bekommen. Die Diskussion um die Arbeitszeit ist gleichzeitig von verschiedenen, meist gegensätzlichen Interessen geprägt: Auf der Beschäftigtenseite zielt die Arbeitszeitflexibilisierung nach wie vor auf Zeitsouveränität: d.h. auf eine bessere Vereinbarkeit der Arbeitszeit mit allen Aktivitäten außerhalb der Arbeitszeit ab. Demgegenüber stellt die Arbeitgeberseite den betriebswirtschaftlichen Aspekt in den Vordergrund. D.h. die Anpassung der Arbeitszeit an den tatsächlichen Arbeitsanfall. So soll durch aufeinander abgestimmte Gestaltung von Betriebszeit und Arbeitszeit die Erhöhung der Produktivität und die Sicherung der Wettbewerbsfähigkeit erzielt werden. Durch diesen Trend verlor das sog. Normalarbeitsverhältnis an Allgemeingültigkeit und die Flexibilisierung der Arbeitszeiten nahm seit langem kontinuierlich zu. Folge ist, dass mittlerweile eine breite Palette von Arbeitszeitmodellen existiert, in denen die gesetzlich und vertraglich vereinbarte Wochenarbeitszeit in den Dimensionen Lage, Länge und Verteilung flexibilisiert wird. Auch die Tarifverhandlungen und Auseinandersetzung der Tarifparteien zur Arbeitszeitpolitik sind dadurch gekennzeichnet, dass die Arbeitszeitflexibilisierung und Verlagerung der Tarifpolitik auf betriebliche Ebene einen Bedeutungszuwachs bekam und die Meinungsführerschaft in Sachen Arbeitszeitgestaltung von der IG Metall zu Gesamtmetall wechselte. Ziel der vorliegenden Dissertation war es, anhand einer empirisch-historischen Untersuchung über Einstellungen sowie Strategien von Gesamtmetall und IG Metall die Gestaltungsspielräume flexibler Arbeitszeitmodelle zu bestimmen und gleichzeitig die Defizite herauszuarbeiten. Die Untersuchung gründete sich in erster Linie auf die Dokumentenanalyse von Stellungnahmen der Gesamtmetall und IG-Metall-Leitungsgremien sowie Primär- und Sekundäranalyse von Befragungen der Beschäftigten. Die leitende Frage der Untersuchung war, ob es den Arbeitgeberverbänden und den Gewerkschaften gelingen konnte, die Erfordernisse eines Betriebes und die Belange der Beschäftigten weitgehend in Übereinstimmung zu bringen? Und (wenn ja) unter welchen Voraussetzungen die neuen flexiblen Arbeitszeitsysteme mit den betrieblichen und außerbetrieblichen Interessen der Beschäftigten zu vereinbaren sind. Den Hintergrund für diese Zielerreichung bildete der gesellschaftliche Konflikt zwischen Arbeit und Kapital. Denn die Schwierigkeit bzw. Komplexität lag in der Frage, wie die unterschiedlichen Interessen, die sich in der industriekapitalistischen Gesellschaft durch den Gegensatz "Kapital" und "Arbeit" bestimmen lassen, zu vereinbaren waren bzw. sind.

China's Labor Question

The Honda workers’ strike in 2010 attracted world wide attention. It was one of thousands of labor disputes that happen every year in China, but it was the first major calling for the right of workers to represent themselves in collective bargaining. The question of representation is therefore the main topic of the book. The various contributors to this volume share the view that the Chinese party-state takes the protest against social inequality seriously. It has enacted many laws aimed at channeling dissatisfaction into safe channels. The implementation of these laws, however, lags behind and these laws do not include the right of freedom of association. Without this right, super-exploitation will persist and the system of labor relations will remain prone to eruptive forms of protest. The first part of the book provides an overview of the economic context of Chinese labor relations, the transformation of class-relations, the evolution of labor law, and government policies intended to set a wage floor. Based on extensive field research, the second part looks at the evolution of labor relations at the industry level. In the third part, the focus shifts to the Corporate Social Responsibility agenda in China. The final part looks at the connection between land reform and social inequality.

The Food Crisis: Implications for Labor

Food prices have gone up to prohibitive levels for many of the world’s poor. The vast majority of those who are hungry in the world today are working in agriculture, either as small landholders or as waged agricultural workers. The majority of the food producers have not benefited from rising prices. Apparently, the bargaining power of many producers, just as that of the end consumers, has been weakened vis-à-vis the buyers and retailers of agricultural produce. This powerlessness is also in the face of governments that fail to provide an appropriate infrastructure for smallholders and social protection. The first part of the book provides an introduction to the immediate and structural causes of the food crisis. The second part contains contributions that not only highlight the plight of rural labour but also develop tools for measuring the decent work deficit. The last part emphasizes income security as a major precondition for food security. It looks at the experiences of Brazil and India with the extension of social protection for the poor.

Work and economic security in the 21st century

In recent decades there has been a transformation of two central concepts of modernity – labour and the household. Ela Bhatt – the founder of the Self-Employed Women’s Association of India (SEWA), has made an important contribution to this transformation. Through the emergence of unions such as SEWA, the notion of who represents labour is being broadened; the marginalised are finding an institutional voice. Increasingly, the household is being recognised as a site of both production and reproduction. SEWA is not a traditional trade union that aims, through collective bargaining with an employer, to improve its members’ wages and working conditions as sellers of their labour power. Instead, it aims to empower women economically in the informal economy by bringing them into the mainstream economy as owners of their labour. The union dimension of SEWA builds their collective power through struggle; the cooperative dimension translates their bargaining power into the economic and social development of its members and their community. Besides, Bhatt’s approach to the self-employed was a direct challenge to the ILO’s tripartism when it was established in the early seventies. The first part of the paper provides a short biography of Ela Bhatt, describes the origins of SEWA, analyses a ‘classification struggle’ over how and who is to define what a worker is. In the second part the author considers SEWAs innovative organizing strategy and is rethinking modernity in the labour context. In the conclusion the paper discusses the lessons that can be learnt from Ela Bhatt.

Core Labor Rights

The working paper’s main objective is to explore the extent to which non-compliance to international labor rights is caused by global competition. From the perspective of institutional economics, compliance with core labor rights is beneficial for sustainable development. Nonetheless, violations of these rights occur on a massive scale. The violators usually blame competitive pressures. A number of studies have come to the conclusion that non-compliance does not provide for a competitive edge, thereby denying any economic rationale for non-compliance. While we sympathize with this conclusion, we find that these studies suffer from faulty assumptions in the design of their regression analyses. The assumption of perfect markets devoid of power relations is particularly unrealistic. While workers' rights promise long-term benefits, they may incur short-term production cost increases. On the supply side, the production sites with the highest amount of labor rights violations are characterized by a near perfect competitive situation. The demand side, however, is dominated by an oligopoly of brand name companies and large retailers. Facing a large pool of suppliers, these companies enjoy more bargaining power. Developing countries, the hosts to most of these suppliers, are therefore limited in their ability to raise labor standards on their own. This competitive situation, however, is the very reason why labor rights have to be negotiated internationally. Our exploration starts with an outline of the institutionalist argument of the benefits of core labor rights. Second, we briefly examine some cross-country empirical studies on the impact of trade liberalization (as a proxy for competitive pressures). Third, we develop our own argument which differentiates the impact of trade liberalization along the axes of labor- and capital-intensive production as well as low and medium skill production. Finally, we present evidence from a study on the impact of trade liberalization in Indonesia on the garment industry as an example of a low skill, laborintensive industry on the one hand, and the automobile as an example for a medium skill, capital-intensive industry on the other hand. Because the garment industry’s workforce consists mainly of women, we also discuss the gender dimension of trade liberalization.