Effects of post-harvest treatments on the carbohydrate composition of yacon roots in the Peruvian Andes

Yacon (Smallanthus sonchifolius [Poepp. & Endl.] H. Robinson) is an under-exploited native root crop of the Andes, which stores oligofructans (fructo-oligosaccharides, FOS) as its main component of dry matter (DM). FOS are of increasing economic interest because of their low caloric value in human diets and bifidogenic benefits on colon health. Two on-farm experiments were conducted to: (i) determine the effect of shaded, short-term storage at 1990 and 2930 m a.s.l. in the Andean highlands; and (ii) address the effects of a traditional sunlight exposure (‘sunning’) on the carbohydrate composition in the DM of tuberous yacon roots. After a 6-day shade storage FOS concentrations were smaller at the lower (36–48% of DM) than at the higher altitude (39–58% of DM). After 12 days FOS concentrations were nearly equal at both sites (27–39% of DM). The concentration of free sugars (fructose, glucose, sucrose) increased accordingly from 29–34 to 48–52%. During the 6-day sunning experiment FOS concentrations decreased from 50–62 to 29–44% and free sugars increased from 29–34 to 45–51%. The results indicate that partial hydrolysis of oligofructans starts shortly after harvest. Storage in highland environments should wherever possible exploit the cooler temperatures at higher altitudes. Sunning of yacon’s tuberous roots effectively reduces much of the roots’ water content, in this experiment 40%, and thus allows energy to be saved if yacon is processed into dehydrated products.

Characterization of DnmA, the Dnmt2 homolog in Dictyostelium discoideum

Eukaryotic DNA m5C methyltransferases (MTases) play a major role in many epigenetic regulatory processes like genomic imprinting, X-chromosome inactivation, silencing of transposons and gene expression. Members of the two DNA m5C MTase families, Dnmt1 and Dnmt3, are relatively well studied and many details of their biological functions, biochemical properties as well as interaction partners are known. In contrast, the biological functions of the highly conserved Dnmt2 family, which appear to have non-canonical dual substrate specificity, remain enigmatic despite the efforts of many researchers. The genome of the social amoeba Dictyostelium encodes Dnmt2-homolog, the DnmA, as the only DNA m5C MTase which allowed us to study Dnmt2 function in this organism without interference by the other enzymes. The dnmA gene can be easily disrupted but the knock-out clones did not show obvious phenotypes under normal lab conditions, suggesting that the function of DnmA is not vital for the organism. It appears that the dnmA gene has a low expression profile during vegetative growth and is only 5-fold upregulated during development. Fluorescence microscopy indicated that DnmA-GFP fusions were distributed between both the nucleus and cytoplasm with some enrichment in nuclei. Interestingly, the experiments showed specific dynamics of DnmA-GFP distribution during the cell cycle. The proteins colocalized with DNA in the interphase and were mainly removed from nuclei during mitosis. DnmA functions as an active DNA m5C MTase in vivo and is responsible for weak but detectable DNA methylation of several regions in the Dictyostelium genome. Nevertheless, gel retardation assays showed only slightly higher affinity of the enzyme to dsDNA compared to ssDNA and no specificity towards various sequence contexts, although weak but detectable specificity towards AT-rich sequences was observed. This could be due to intrinsic curvature of such sequences. Furthermore, DnmA did not show denaturant-resistant covalent complexes with dsDNA in vitro, although it could form covalent adducts with ssDNA. Low binding and methyltransfer activity in vitro suggest the necessity of additional factor in DnmA function. Nevertheless, no candidates could be identified in affinity purification experiments with different tagged DnmA fusions. In this respect, it should be noted that tagged DnmA fusion preparations from Dictyostelium showed somewhat higher activity in both covalent adduct formation and methylation assays than DnmA expressed in E.coli. Thus, the presence of co-purified factors cannot be excluded. The low efficiency of complex formation by the recombinant enzyme and the failure to define interacting proteins that could be required for DNA methylation in vivo, brought up the assumption that post-translational modifications could influence target recognition and enzymatic activity. Indeed, sites of phosphorylation, methylation and acetylation were identified within the target recognition domain (TRD) of DnmA by mass spectrometry. For phosphorylation, the combination of MS data and bioinformatic analysis revealed that some of the sites could well be targets for specific kinases in vivo. Preliminary 3D modeling of DnmA protein based on homology with hDNMT2 allowed us to show that several identified phosphorylation sites located on the surface of the molecule, where they would be available for kinases. The presence of modifications almost solely within the TRD domain of DnmA could potentially modulate the mode of its interaction with the target nucleic acids. DnmA was able to form denaturant-resistant covalent intermediates with several Dictyostelium tRNAs, using as a target C38 in the anticodon loop. The formation of complexes not always correlated with the data from methylation assays, and seemed to be dependent on both sequence and structure of the tRNA substrate. The pattern, previously suggested by the Helm group for optimal methyltransferase activity of hDNMT2, appeared to contribute significantly in the formation of covalent adducts but was not the only feature of the substrate required for DnmA and hDNMT2 functions. Both enzymes required Mg2+ to form covalent complexes, which indicated that the specific structure of the target tRNA was indispensable. The dynamics of covalent adduct accumulation was different for DnmA and different tRNAs. Interestingly, the profiles of covalent adduct accumulation for different tRNAs were somewhat similar for DnmA and hDNMT2 enzymes. According to the proposed catalytic mechanism for DNA m5C MTases, the observed denaturant-resistant complexes corresponded to covalent enamine intermediates. The apparent discrepancies in the data from covalent complex formation and methylation assays may be interpreted by the possibility of alternative pathways of the catalytic mechanism, leading not to methylation but to exchange or demethylation reactions. The reversibility of enamine intermediate formation should also be considered. Curiously, native gel retardation assays showed no or little difference in binding affinities of DnmA to different RNA substrates and thus the absence of specificity in the initial enzyme binding. The meaning of the tRNA methylation as well as identification of novel RNA substrates in vivo should be the aim of further experiments.

Untersuchungen zur Biofilmbildung bei dem klinischen Isolat Enterococcus faecalis 1.10

In der vorliegenden Arbeit wurde die Biofilmbildung bei einem klinischen Isolat von Enterococcus faecalis untersucht. Der Prozess der Biofilmbildung ist in mehrere Abschnitte unterteilt und beinhaltet zu Beginn eine Anhaftung von Zellen an Oberflächen. Dieser adhäsive Schritt wird unter anderem durch Pili vermittelt. Pili bei Grampositiven Mikroorganismen sind kovalent mit der Zellwand verknüpfte Proteinstrukturen, die eine Anheftung an biotische und abiotische Oberflächen sowie den Zell-Zell-Kontakt vermitteln. Bei den Analysen dieser Doktorarbeit lag ein besonderes Interesse bei eben diesen Pili, die für Enterococcus faecalis die Namen Ebp (endocarditis and biofilm associated pili) und Bee (biofilm enhancer in enterococci) tragen. Codiert werden sie durch die entsprechenden ebp-/bee-Loci, deren Aufbau unter den Grampositiven Mikroorganismen hochkonserviert ist. Die Loci bestehen aus Pilusuntereinheiten-codierenden Genen und colokalisierten Pilus-spezifischen Sortase Genen. Während in der Regel drei verschiedene Pilusuntereinheiten vorliegen, kann die Anzahl der Sortasen zwischen einer und zwei variieren. Bei den Experimenten wurde neben einer Komplementationsstudie zu einer Bee-Pilus Defekt-Mutante (1.10.16) das Hauptaugenmerk auf die Analyse des zweiten Pilus (Ebp) gelegt, um die Pilisituation bei Isolat 1.10 im Detail darzustellen Zusätzlich sollten weitere Oberflächenassoziierte Proteinstrukturen bei Isolat 1.10 detektiert werden, die gegebenenfalls an der Biofilmbildung beteiligt sind. Weitere Versuche zur Charakterisierung des Bee-Pilus wurden im Laufe dieser Arbeit durchgeführt, blieben jedoch bisher erfolglos. Die Biofilm-/Pilus-Defekt-Mutante 1.10.16 zeigte aufgrund einer Punktmutation (Pm) in der Pilus-spezifischen Sortase 1 des bee-Locus eine geschwächte Fähigkeit zur Anheftung an abiotische Oberflächen, sowie das Fehlen der Bee2 Untereinheit im Pilus. Nach Komplementation der Mutante (1.10.16K) mit dem Wildtyp-srt1 Gen, wurde die starke Biofilmbildungsfähigkeit zurück erlangt. Die Experimente zeigten, dass der Pilus-Defekt auf die Pm im srt1 Gen zurückzuführen war und der Bee-Pilus in Stamm 1.10.16K wieder korrekt gebildet wurde. Zu sehen war dies in Rasterelektronenmikroskopischen Aufnahmen und ebenfalls im massenspektrometrischen Nachweis aller 3 Pilusuntereinheiten im Bee-Pilus charakteristischen High-Molecular-Weight Komplex (~ 250 kDa). Durch Sequenzierungen konnte gezeigt werden, dass zwei Gene des ebp-Locus (ebpR und ebpC) bei Isolat 1.10 durch die Insertion von IS-Elementen IS1062 und IS6770 inaktiviert wurden. Der proteinbiochemische Nachweis über Pilusspezifische Antikörper gegen die Untereinheiten des Ebp-Pilus verlief negativ. Zusätzlich konnte gezeigt werden, dass die mRNA der beiden inaktivierten Gene nicht gebildet wurde. Dies führte folglich zum vollständigen Verlust des Ebp-Pilus bei Isolat 1.10. Zusammen mit den Ergebnissen der Komplementation konnte somit der große Einfluss mindestens eines intakten Pilus auf die Biofilmbildung gezeigt werden. Sind beide Pili durch Insertionen bzw. Mutationen inaktiviert, kommt es zu einer deutlichen Abnahme der Biofilmbildungsstärke. Dass trotzdem noch ein Biofilm gebildet wurde, zeigt den multifaktoriellen Zusammenhang bzw. Einfluss im Biofilmbildungsprozess. Über das gezielte Markieren von Oberflächenproteinen intakter Zellen mittels der Oberflächenbiotinylierung, konnten in der SDS-PAGE Unterschiede im Bandenmuster im Vergleich zur unbehandelten Probe erkannt werden. Die massenspektrometrische Identifikation dieser Proteine erfolgte bisher nicht, jedoch sind diese vorläufigen Ergebnisse vielversprechender Natur für die Identifikation und Aufklärung der Oberflächenproteinsituation bei Isolat 1.10.