Prognosemethode für das Schutzgut ‚Landschaft’ im Rahmen der Strategischen Umweltprüfung

Im Mittelpunkt der Dissertation stehen das Schutzgut ‚Landschaft’ sowie ‚Prognosemethoden in der Umweltprüfung’. Mit beiden Themenbereichen verbinden sich bereits heute ungelöste methodische Probleme, die mit der Umsetzung der Richtlinie zur Strategischen Umweltprüfung (SUP) zusätzlich komplexer und deren Lösung mithin anspruchsvoller werden. Dies hängt einerseits damit zusammen, dass eine gesetzeskonforme Gleichbehandlung aller Schutzgüter zunehmend eingefordert wird und gerade das Schutzgut ‚Landschaft’ in einer SUP methodisch besondere Aufmerksamkeit verlangt. Zum anderen führt die gängige planungsmethodische Diskussion allein nicht zu geeigneten Antworten auf o.g. Fragen, und es bedarf der Prüfung verschiedener Methodenbausteine, auch aus anderen Wissensgebieten, um – über ein eindimensionales Landschaftsverständnis einerseits und die bisher bekannten linearen Wirkungsprognosen andererseits hinaus gehend – mehrfach verknüpfte Prognoseschritte zur Anwendung in der SUP zu entwickeln, in denen das Schutzgut ‚Landschaft’ modellhaft für Bewertungsschritte nachvollziehbar abgebildet wird. Hierbei müssen entscheidungsrelevante Prognosezeiträume ebenso beachtet werden, wie in diesen Zeiträumen möglicherweise auftretende sekundäre, kumulative, synergetische, positive und negative Auswirkungen der zu beurteilenden Planung. Dieser Ziel- und Aufgabenstellung entsprechend erfolgt die theoretische Herangehensweise der Arbeit von zwei Seiten: 1. Die Funktionen und Stellung von Prognosen innerhalb der SUP wird erläutert (Kap. 2), und es wird der Frage nachgegangen, welche Anforderungen an Prognosemethoden zu stellen sind (Kap. 2.4) und welche Prognosemethoden in der SUP Verwendung finden bzw. finden können (Kap. 3). Der Schwerpunkt wird dabei auf die Anwendung der Szenariotechnik gelegt. 2. Es wird dargestellt wie Landschaft für Aufgaben der Landschaftsplanung und Umweltprüfung bisher üblicherweise erfasst und analysiert wird, um in Prognoseschritten handhabbar behandelt zu werden (Kap. 4). Beide Zugänge werden sodann zusammengeführt (Kap. 5), um am Beispiel einer Hochwasserschutzkonzeption im Rahmen der SUP Landschaftliche Prognosen zu erarbeiten. Die Prognose setzt methodisch mit der Beschreibung des zu verwendenden Landschaftsmodells und der Klärung des Modellzwecks ein. Bezugsbasis ist die Beschreibung des Charakters einzelner logisch hergeleiteter Landschaftseinheiten bzw. Landschaftsräume, die typisiert werden. Die Prognose selber unterscheidet zwischen der Abschätzung zu erwartender Landschaftsveränderungen im Sinne der ‚Status-quo-Prognose’ (einschließlich der Entwicklung von drei Szenarien möglicher Zukunftslandschaften bis 2030) und der Wirkungsabschätzungen verschiedener Maßnahmen bzw. Planungsalternativen und zwar zunächst raumunabhängig, und dann raumkonkret. Besondere Bedeutung bei den Wirkungsabschätzungen erhält die klare Trennung von Sach- und Wertebene, eine angemessene Visualisierung und die Dokumentation von Informationslücken und Unsicherheiten bei der Prognose. Diskutiert wird u.a. (Kap. 6) · die Bildung und Abgrenzung landschaftlicher Einheiten und Typen in Bezug zu der Aufgabe, landschaftliche Eigenart zu definieren und planerisch handhabbar und anwendbar zu bestimmen, · die Bedeutung angemessener Visualisierung zur Unterstützung von Beteiligungsverfahren und · die Bestimmung des so genannten ‚Raumwiderstandes’. Beigefügt sind zwei Karten des gesamten Bearbeitungsgebietes: Karte 1 „Landschaftstypen“, Karte 2 „Maßnahmentypen des Hochwasserschutzes mit möglichen Synergieeffekten für die Landschaft“.

Understanding Recreational Services of Urban Riverfront Space for Planning Purposes

In the process of urbanization, natural and semi-natural landscapes are increasingly cherished as open space and recreational resource. Urban rivers are part of this kind of resource and thus play an important role in managing urban resilience and health. Employing the example of Tianjin, this doctoral dissertation research aims at learning to understand how to plan and design for the interface zones between urban water courses and for the land areas adjacent to such water courses. This research also aims at learning how to link waterfront space with other urban space in order to make a recreational space system for the benefit of people. Five questions of this dissertation are: 1) what is the role of rivers in spatial and open space planning? 2) What are the human needs regarding outdoor open space? 3) How do river and water front spatial structures affect people's recreational activities? 4) How to define the recreational service of urban river and waterfront open space? 5) How might answering these question change planning and design of urban open space? Quantitative and qualitative empirical approaches were combined in this study for which literature review and theoretical explorations provide the basis. Empirical investigations were conducted in the city of Tianjin. The quantitative approach includes conducting 267 quantitative interviews, and the qualitative approach includes carrying out field observations and mappings. GIS served to support analysis and visualization of empirical information that was generated through this study. By responding to the five research questions, findings and lessons include the following: 1) In the course of time rivers have gained importance in all levels and scales of spatial planning and decision making. Regarding the development of ecological networks, mainly at national scale, rivers are considered significant linear elements. Regarding regional and comprehensive development, river basins and watersheds are often considered as the structural link for strategic ecological, economic, social and recreational planning. For purposes of urban planning, particularly regarding recreational services in cities, the distribution of urban open spaces often follows the structure of river systems. 2) For the purpose of classifying human recreational needs that relate to outdoor open space Maslow's hierarchy of human needs serves as theoretical basis. The classes include geographical, safety, physiological, social and aesthetic need. These classes serve as references while analyzing river and waterfront open space and other kinds of open space. 3) Regarding the question how river and waterfront spatial structures might affect people's recreational activities, eight different landscape units were identified and compared in the case study area. Considering the thermal conditions of Tianjin, one of these landscape units was identified as affording the optimal spatial arrangement which mostly meets recreational needs. The size and the shape of open space, and the plants present in an open space have been observed as being most relevant regarding recreational activities. 4) Regarding the recreational service of urban river and waterfront open space the results of this research suggest that the recreational service is felt less intensively as the distances between water 183 front and open space user’s places of residence are increasing. As a method for estimating this ‘Service Distance Effect’ the following formula may be used: Y = a*ebx. In this equation Y means the ‘Service Distance’ between homes and open space, and X means the percentage of the people who live within this service distance. Coefficient "a" represents the distance of the residential area nearest to the water front. The coefficient "b" is a comprehensive capability index that refers to the size of the available and suitable recreational area. 5) Answers found to the questions above have implications for the planning and design of urban open space. The results from the quantitative study of recreational services of waterfront open space were applied to the assessment of river-based open space systems. It is recommended that such assessments might be done employing the network analysis function available with any GIS. In addition, several practical planning and designing suggestions are made that would help remedy any insufficient base for satisfying recreational needs. The understanding of recreational need is considered helpful for the proposing planning and designing ideas and for the changing of urban landscapes. In the course of time Tianjin's urban water system has shrunk considerably. At the same time rivers and water courses have shaped Tianjin's urban structure in noticeable ways. In the process of urbanization water has become increasingly important to the citizens and their everyday recreations. Much needs to be changed in order to improve recreational opportunities and to better provide for a livable city, most importantly when considering the increasing number of old people. Suggestions made that are based on results of this study, might be implemented in Tianjin. They are 1) to promote the quality of the waterfront open space and to make all linear waterfront area accessible recreational spaces. Then, 2), it is advisable to advocate the concept of green streets and to combine green streets with river open space in order to form an everyday recreational network. And 3) any sound urban everyday recreational service made cannot rely on only urban rivers; the whole urban structure needs to be improved, including adding small open space and optimize the form of urban communities, finally producing a multi-functional urban recreational network.

Finding Spaces for Urban Food Production – Matching Spatial and Stakeholder Analysis with Urban Agriculture Approaches in the Urban Renewal Area of Dortmund-Hörde, Germany

Using the case of an economically declined neighbourhood in the post-industrial German Ruhr Area (sometimes characterized as Germany’s “Rust Belt”), we analyse, describe and conclude how urban agriculture can be used as a catalyst to stimulate and support urban renewal and regeneration, especially from a socio-cultural perspective. Using the methodological framework of participatory action research, and linking bottom-up and top-down planning approaches, a project path was developed to include the population affected and foster individual responsibility for their district, as well as to strengthen inhabitants and stakeholder groups in a permanent collective stewardship for the individual forms of urban agriculture developed and implemented. On a more abstract level, the research carried out can be characterized as a form of action research with an intended transgression of the boundaries between research, planning, design, and implementation. We conclude that by synchronously combining those four domains with intense feedback loops, synergies for the academic knowledge on the potential performance of urban agriculture in terms of sustainable development, as well as the benefits for the case-study area and the interests of individual urban gardeners can be achieved.