Die Privatisierung der Öffentlichen Personennahverkehrs (ÖPNV) und die damit verbundene Problematik des marktwirtschaftlichen und interventionistischen Dualismus am Beispiel des Schienenpersonennahverkehrs (SPNV) in der Fläche

Der SPNV als Bestandteil des ÖPNV bildet einen integralen Bestandteil der öffentlichen Daseinsvorsorge. Insbesondere Flächenregionen abseits urbaner Ballungszentren erhalten durch den SPNV sowohl ökonomisch als auch soziokulturell wichtige Impulse, so dass die Zukunftsfähigkeit dieser Verkehrsart durch geeignete Gestaltungsmaßnahmen zu sichern ist. ZIELE: Die Arbeit verfolgte das Ziel, derartige Gestaltungsmaßnahmen sowohl grundlagentheoretisch herzuleiten als auch in ihrer konkreten Ausformung für die verkehrswirtschaftliche Praxis zu beschreiben. Abgezielt wurde insofern auf strukturelle Konzepte als auch praktische Einzelmaßnahmen. Der Schwerpunkt der Analyse erstreckte sich dabei auf Deutschland, wobei jedoch auch verkehrsbezogene Privatisierungserfahrungen aus anderen europäischen Staaten und den USA berücksichtigt wurden. METHODEN: Ausgewertet wurden deutschsprachige als auch internationale Literatur primär verkehrswissenschaftlicher Ausrichtung sowie Fallbeispiele verkehrswirtschaftlicher Privatisierung. Darüber hinaus wurden Entscheidungsträger der Deutschen Bahn (DB) und DB-externe Eisenbahnexperten interviewt. Eine Gruppe 5 DB-interner und 5 DB-externer Probanden nahm zusätzlich an einer standardisierten Erhebung zur Einschätzung struktureller und spezifischer Gestaltungsmaßnahmen für den SPNV teil. ERGEBNISSE: In struktureller Hinsicht ist die Eigentums- und Verfügungsregelung für das gesamte deutsche Bahnwesen und den SPNV kritisch zu bewerten, da der dominante Eisenbahninfrastrukturbetreiber (EIU) in Form der DB Netz AG und die das Netz nutzenden Eisenbahnverkehrs-Unternehmen (EVUs, nach wie vor zumeist DB-Bahnen) innerhalb der DB-Holding konfundiert sind. Hieraus ergeben sich Diskriminierungspotenziale vor allem gegenüber DB-externen EVUs. Diese Situation entspricht keiner echten Netz-Betriebs-Trennung, die wettbewerbstheoretisch sinnvoll wäre und nachhaltige Konkurrenz verschiedener EVUs ermöglichen würde. Die seitens der DB zur Festigung bestehender Strukturen vertretene Argumentation, wonach Netz und Betrieb eine untrennbare Einheit (Synergie) bilden sollten, ist weder wettbewerbstheoretisch noch auf der Ebene technischer Aspekte akzeptabel. Vielmehr werden durch die gegenwärtige Verquickung der als Quasimonopol fungierenden Netzebene mit der Ebene der EVU-Leistungen Innovationspotenziale eingeschränkt. Abgesehen von der grundsätzlichen Notwendigkeit einer konsequenten Netz-Betriebs-Trennung und dezentraler Strukturen sind Ausschreibungen (faktisch öffentliches Verfahren) für den Betrieb der SPNV-Strecken als Handlungsansatz zu berücksichtigen. Wettbewerb kann auf diese Weise gleichsam an der Quelle einer EVU-Leistung ansetzen, wobei politische und administrative Widerstände gegen dieses Konzept derzeit noch unverkennbar sind. Hinsichtlich infrastruktureller Maßnahmen für den SPNV ist insbesondere das sog. "Betreibermodell" sinnvoll, bei dem sich das übernehmende EIU im Sinne seiner Kernkompetenzen auf den Betrieb konzentriert. Die Verantwortung für bauliche Maßnahmen sowie die Instandhaltung der Strecken liegt beim Betreiber, welcher derartige Leistungen am Markt einkaufen kann (Kostensenkungspotenzial). Bei Abgabeplanungen der DB Netz AG für eine Strecke ist mithin für die Auswahl eines Betreibers auf den genannten Ausschreibungsmodus zurückzugreifen. Als kostensenkende Einzelmaßnahmen zur Zukunftssicherung des SPNV werden abschließend insbesondere die Optimierung des Fahrzeugumlaufes sowie der Einsatz von Triebwagen anstatt lokbespannter Züge und die weiter forcierte Ausrichtung auf die kundenorientierte Attraktivitätssteigerung des SPNV empfohlen. SCHLUSSFOLGERUNGEN: Handlungsansätze für eine langfristige Sicherung des SPNV können nicht aus der Realisierung von Extrempositionen (staatlicher Interventionismus versus Liberalismus) resultieren, sondern nur aus einem pragmatischen Ausgleich zwischen beiden Polen. Dabei erscheint eine Verschiebung hin zum marktwirtschaftlichen Pol sinnvoll, um durch die Nutzung wettbewerbsbezogener Impulse Kostensenkungen und Effizienzsteigerungen für den SPNV herbeizuführen.

Knowledge Building in Landscape Architecture

The objective of this study was to develop an internet-based seminar framework applicable for landscape architecture education. This process was accompanied by various aims. The basic expectation was to keep the main characteristics of landscape architecture education also in the online format. On top of that, four further objectives were anticipated: (1) training of competences for virtual team work, (2) fostering intercultural competence, (3) creation of equal opportunities for education through internet-based open access and (4) synergy effects and learning processes across institutional boundaries. This work started with the hypothesis that these four expected advantages would compensate for additional organisational efforts caused by the online delivery of the seminars and thus lead to a sustainable integration of this new learning mode into landscape architecture curricula. This rationale was followed by a presentation of four areas of knowledge to which the seminar development was directly related (1) landscape architecture as a subject and its pedagogy, (2) general learning theories, (3) developments in the ICT sector and (4) wider societal driving forces such as global citizenship and the increase of open educational resources. The research design took the shape of a pedagogical action research cycle. This approach was constructive: The author herself is teaching international landscape architecture students so that the model could directly be applied in practice. Seven online seminars were implemented in the period from 2008 to 2013 and this experience represents the core of this study. The seminars were conducted with varying themes while its pedagogy, organisation and the technological tools remained widely identical. The research design is further based on three levels of observation: (1) the seminar design on the basis of theory and methods from the learning sciences, in particular educational constructivism, (2) the seminar evaluation and (3) the evaluation of the seminars’ long term impact. The seminar model itself basically consists of four elements: (1) the taxonomy of learning objectives, (2) ICT tools and their application and pedagogy, (3) process models and (4) the case study framework. The seminar framework was followed by the presentation of the evaluation findings. The major findings of this study can be summed up as follows: Implementing online seminars across educational and national boundaries was possible both in term of organisation and technology. In particular, a high level of cultural diversity among the seminar participants has definitively been achieved. However, there were also obvious obstacles. These were primarily competing study commitments and incompatible schedules among the students attending from different academic programmes, partly even in different time zones. Both factors had negative impact on the individual and working group performances. With respect to the technical framework it can be concluded that the majority of the participants were able to use the tools either directly without any problem or after overcoming some smaller problems. Also the seminar wiki was intensively used for completing the seminar assignments. However, too less truly collaborative text production was observed which could be improved by changing the requirements for the collaborative task. Two different process models have been applied for guiding the collaboration of the small groups and both were in general successful. However, it needs to be said that even if the students were able to follow the collaborative task and to co-construct and compare case studies, most of them were not able to synthesize the knowledge they had compiled. This means that the area of consideration often remained on the level of the case and further reflections, generalisations and critique were largely missing. This shows that the seminar model needs to find better ways for triggering knowledge building and critical reflection. It was also suggested to have a more differentiated group building strategy in future seminars. A comparison of pre- and post seminar concept maps showed that an increase of factual and conceptual knowledge on the individual level was widely recognizable. Also the evaluation of the case studies (the major seminar output) revealed that the students have undergone developments of both the factual and the conceptual knowledge domain. Also their self-assessment with respect to individual learning development showed that the highest consensus was achieved in the field of subject-specific knowledge. The participants were much more doubtful with regard to the progress of generic competences such as analysis, communication and organisation. However, 50% of the participants confirmed that they perceived individual development on all competence areas the survey had asked for. Have the additional four targets been met? Concerning the competences for working in a virtual team it can be concluded that the vast majority was able to use the internet-based tools and to work with them in a target-oriented way. However, there were obvious differences regarding the intensity and activity of participation, both because of external and personal factors. A very positive aspect is the achievement of a high cultural diversity supporting the participants’ intercultural competence. Learning from group members was obviously a success factor for the working groups. Regarding the possibilities for better accessibility of educational opportunities it became clear that a significant number of participants were not able to go abroad during their studies because of financial or personal reasons. They confirmed that the online seminar was to some extent a compensation for not having been abroad for studying. Inter-institutional learning and synergy was achieved in so far that many teachers from different countries contributed with individual lectures. However, those teachers hardly ever followed more than one session. Therefore, the learning effect remained largely within the seminar learning group. Looking back at the research design it can be said that the pedagogical action research cycle was an appropriate and valuable approach allowing for strong interaction between theory and practice. However, some more external evaluation from peers in particular regarding the participants’ products would have been valuable.

Growing through Connections – A Multi-Case Study of Two Alternative Food Networks in Cluj-Napoca, Romania

In a context of urgent global socio-ecological challenges, the aim of this paper has been to explore the potential of localised and socially connected food systems. More specifically, through a multi-case study of two alternative food networks in the city of Cluj-Napoca, Romania, their contribution to a sustainable food paradigm has been explored. An important synergy within the networks is how good food is equated with peasant produce, but issues regarding quantity, delivery arrangement, power relations and inclusiveness constitute potential conflicts. Although challenged by unfavourable trends on national and EU levels, the networks are becoming more embedded horizontally, through an intrinsic focus on community in one case and through quality food stimulating good relations in the other case. The networks contribute to a sustainable food paradigm by promoting agroecology, by reclaiming socio-cultural factors of food provisioning and by being part of a (re)-peasantisation process. Exploring how these kinds of initiatives can emerge, be sustained and be developed is of relevance, especially considering their potential for improving the prospects of environmentally sustainable and socially just futures in Romania and beyond.