Strategies towards evaluation beyond scientific impact

Various research fields, like organic agricultural research, are dedicated to solving real-world problems and contributing to sustainable development. Therefore, systems research and the application of interdisciplinary and transdisciplinary approaches are increasingly endorsed. However, research performance depends not only on self-conception, but also on framework conditions of the scientific system, which are not always of benefit to such research fields. Recently, science and its framework conditions have been under increasing scrutiny as regards their ability to serve societal benefit. This provides opportunities for (organic) agricultural research to engage in the development of a research system that will serve its needs. This article focuses on possible strategies for facilitating a balanced research evaluation that recognises scientific quality as well as societal relevance and applicability. These strategies are (a) to strengthen the general support for evaluation beyond scientific impact, and (b) to provide accessible data for such evaluations. Synergies of interest are found between open access movements and research communities focusing on global challenges and sustainability. As both are committed to increasing the societal benefit of science, they may support evaluation criteria such as knowledge production and dissemination tailored to societal needs, and the use of open access. Additional synergies exist between all those who scrutinise current research evaluation systems for their ability to serve scientific quality, which is also a precondition for societal benefit. Here, digital communication technologies provide opportunities to increase effectiveness, transparency, fairness and plurality in the dissemination of scientific results, quality assurance and reputation. Furthermore, funders may support transdisciplinary approaches and open access and improve data availability for evaluation beyond scientific impact. If they begin to use current research information systems that include societal impact data while reducing the requirements for narrative reports, documentation burdens on researchers may be relieved, with the funders themselves acting as data providers for researchers, institutions and tailored dissemination beyond academia.

Wahrnehmungspsychologische Evaluation eines dreidimensionalen Visualisierungssystems

Diese Arbeit beschreibt den Evaluationsprozess einer dreidimensionalen Visualisierungstechnik, die am Institut für periphere Mikroelektronik der Universität Kassel entwickelt wurde. Hinter der dreidimensionalen Darstellung mittels Linsenrasterscheibe verbirgt sich eine neue Dimension der Interaktion mit dem Computer. Im Vergleich zu gewöhnlichen dreidimensionalen Darstellungen, bei denen ein 3D-Objekt auf einer 2D-Fläche abgebildet wird und somit nach wie vor nicht aus der Bildschirmebene heraus kann, können bei der stereoskopen Darstellung die Objekte dreidimensional visualisiert werden. Die Objekte tauchen vor, beziehungsweise hinter der Darstellungsebene auf. Da die Linsenrasterscheibe bisher noch nicht wahrnehmungspsychologisch untersucht wurde und auch allgemein auf dem Gebiet der Evaluation von 3D-Systemen nur wenige Untersuchungen mit quantitativen Ergebnissen verfügbar sind (Vollbracht, 1997), besteht hier ein zentrales Forschungsinteresse. Um eine Evaluation dieses 3D-Systems durchzuführen, wird im Theorieteil der Arbeit zunächst der Begriff der Evaluation definiert. Des Weiteren werden die wahrnehmungspsychologischen Grundlagen der monokularen und binokularen Raumwahrnehmung erörtert. Anschließend werden Techniken zur Erzeugung von Tiefe in Bildern und auf Bildschirmen erläutert und die Unterschiede zwischen der technisch erzeugten und der natürlichen Tiefenwahrnehmung näher beleuchtet. Nach der Vorstellung verschiedener stereoskoper Systeme wird näher auf die autostereoskope Linsenrasterscheibe eingegangen. Zum Abschluss des theoretischen Teils dieser Arbeit wird die Theorie des eingesetzten Befindlichkeitsfragebogens veranschaulicht. Gegenstand des empirischen Teils dieser Arbeit sind zwei zentrale Fragestellungen. Erstens soll untersucht werden, ob durch den höheren Informationsgehalt grundlegende Wahrnehmungsleistungen in bestimmten Bereichen positiv beeinflusst werden können. Zweitens soll untersucht werden, ob sich die höhere visuelle Natürlichkeit und die Neuartigkeit der Bildpräsentation auch auf die subjektive Befindlichkeit der Probanden auswirkt. Die empirische Überprüfung dieser Hypothesen erfolgt mittels dreier Experimente. Bei den ersten beiden Experimenten stehen grundlegende wahrnehmungspsychologische Leistungen im Vordergrund, während in der dritten Untersuchung der Bereich der subjektiven Befindlichkeit gemessen wird. Abschließend werden die Ergebnisse der Untersuchungen vorgestellt und diskutiert. Des Weiteren werden konkrete Einsatzmöglichkeiten für die Linsenrasterscheibe aufgezeigt und denkbare nachfolgende experimentelle Vorgehensweisen skizziert.

Verbal proficiency as fitness indicator: Experimental and comparative research on the evolutionary psychology of language and verbal displays

Summary: Recent research on the evolution of language and verbal displays (e.g., Miller, 1999, 2000a, 2000b, 2002) indicated that language is not only the result of natural selection but serves as a sexually-selected fitness indicator that is an adaptation showing an individual’s suitability as a reproductive mate. Thus, language could be placed within the framework of concepts such as the handicap principle (Zahavi, 1975). There are several reasons for this position: Many linguistic traits are highly heritable (Stromswold, 2001, 2005), while naturally-selected traits are only marginally heritable (Miller, 2000a); men are more prone to verbal displays than women, who in turn judge the displays (Dunbar, 1996; Locke & Bogin, 2006; Lange, in press; Miller, 2000a; Rosenberg & Tunney, 2008); verbal proficiency universally raises especially male status (Brown, 1991); many linguistic features are handicaps (Miller, 2000a) in the Zahavian sense; most literature is produced by men at reproduction-relevant age (Miller, 1999). However, neither an experimental study investigating the causal relation between verbal proficiency and attractiveness, nor a study showing a correlation between markers of literary and mating success existed. In the current studies, it was aimed to fill these gaps. In the first one, I conducted a laboratory experiment. Videos in which an actor and an actress performed verbal self-presentations were the stimuli for counter-sex participants. Content was always alike, but the videos differed on three levels of verbal proficiency. Predictions were, among others, that (1) verbal proficiency increases mate value, but that (2) this applies more to male than to female mate value due to assumed past sex-different selection pressures causing women to be very demanding in mate choice (Trivers, 1972). After running a two-factorial analysis of variance with the variables sex and verbal proficiency as factors, the first hypothesis was supported with high effect size. For the second hypothesis, there was only a trend going in the predicted direction. Furthermore, it became evident that verbal proficiency affects long-term more than short-term mate value. In the second study, verbal proficiency as a menstrual cycle-dependent mate choice criterion was investigated. Basically the same materials as in the former study were used with only marginal changes in the used questionnaire. The hypothesis was that fertile women rate high verbal proficiency in men higher than non-fertile women because of verbal proficiency being a potential indicator of “good genes”. However, no significant result could be obtained in support of the hypothesis in the current study. In the third study, the hypotheses were: (1) most literature is produced by men at reproduction-relevant age. (2) The more works of high literary quality a male writer produces, the more mates and children he has. (3) Lyricists have higher mating success than non-lyric writers because of poetic language being a larger handicap than other forms of language. (4) Writing literature increases a man’s status insofar that his offspring shows a significantly higher male-to-female sex ratio than in the general population, as the Trivers-Willard hypothesis (Trivers & Willard, 1973) applied to literature predicts. In order to test these hypotheses, two famous literary canons were chosen. Extensive biographical research was conducted on the writers’ mating successes. The first hypothesis was confirmed; the second one, controlling for life age, only for number of mates but not entirely regarding number of children. The latter finding was discussed with respect to, among others, the availability of effective contraception especially in the 20th century. The third hypothesis was not satisfactorily supported. The fourth hypothesis was partially supported. For the 20th century part of the German list, the secondary sex ratio differed with high statistical significance from the ratio assumed to be valid for a general population.