Gender and Space in Tehran

Abstract: This dissertation generally concentrates on the relationships between “gender” and “space” in the present time of urban life in capital city of Tehran. “Gender” as a changing social construct, differentiated within societies and through time, studied this time by investigation on “gender attitude” or “gender identity” means attitudes towards “gender” issues regarding Tehran residences. “Space” as a concept integrated from physical and social constituents investigated through focus on “spatial attitude” means attitudes towards using “living spaces” including private space of “house”, semi private semi public space of neighborhood and finally public spaces of the city. “Activities and practices” in space concentrated instead of “physical” space; this perspective to “space” discussed as the most justified implication of “space” in this debate regarding current situations in city of Tehran. Under a systematic approach, the interactions and interconnections between “gender” and “space” as two constituent variables of social organization investigated by focus on the different associations presented between different “gender identities” and their different “spatial identities”; in fact, “spatial identity” manifests “gender identity” and in opposite direction, “spatial identity” influences to construction of “gender identity”. The hypotheses of case study in Tehran defined as followed: • “Gender identity” is reflected on “spatial identity”. Various “gender identities” in Tehran present different perspectives of “space” or they identify “space” by different values. • As “gender identity” internalizes patriarchal oppression, it internalizes associated “spatial” oppression too. • Within the same social class, different “gender identities” related to men and women, present interconnected qualities, compared with “gender identities” related to men or women of different social classes. This situation could be found in the “spatial” perspectives of different groups of men and women too. • Following the upper hypotheses, “spatial” oppression differs among social classes of Tehran living in different parts of this city. This research undertook a qualitative study in Tehran by interviewing with different parents of both young daughter and son regarding their attitudes towards gender issues from one side and activities and behaviors of their children in different spaces from the other side. Results of case study indicated the parallel changes of parents’ attitudes towards “gender” and “spatial” issues; it means strong connection between “gender” and “space”. It revealed association of “equal” spatial attitudes with “open, neutral” gender attitudes, and also the association of “biased, unequal” spatial identities with “conservative patriarchal” gender identities. It was cleared too that this variable concept – gender space - changes by “sex”; mothers comparing fathers presented more equitable notions towards “gender spatial” issues. It changes too by “social class” and “educational level”, that means “gender spatial” identity getting more open equitable among more educated people of middle and upper classes. “Breadwinning status in the family” also presents its effect on the changes of “gender spatial” identity so participant breadwinners in the family expressed relatively more equitable notions comparing householders and housekeepers. And finally, “gender spatial” identity changes through “place” in the city and regarding South – North line of the city. The illustration of changes of “gender spatial” identity from “open” to “conservative” among society indicated not only vertical variation across social classes, furthermore the horizontal changing among each social class. These results also confirmed hypotheses while made precision on the third one regarding variable of sex. More investigations pointed to some inclusive spatial attitudes throughout society penetrated to different groups of “gender identities”, to “opens” as to “conservatives”, also to groups between them, by two opposite features; first kind, conservative biased spatial practices in favor of patriarchal gender relations and the second, progressive neutral actions in favor of equal gender relations. While the major reason for the inclusive conservative practices was referred to the social insecurity for women, the second neutral ones associated to more formal & safer spaces of the city. In conclusion, while both trends are associated deeply with the important issues of “sex” & “body” in patriarchal thoughts, still strong, they are the consequences of the transitional period of social change in macro level, and the challenges involved regarding interactions between social orders, between old system of patriarchy, the traditional biased “gender spatial” relations and the new one of equal relations. The case study drew an inhomogeneous illustration regarding gender spatial aspects of life in Tehran, the opposite groups of “open” and “conservative”, and the large group of “semi open semi conservative” between them. In macro perspective it presents contradicted social groups according their general life styles; they are the manifestations of challenging trends towards tradition and modernity in Iranian society. This illustration while presents unstable social situations, necessitates probing solutions for social integration; exploring the directions could make heterogeneous social groups close in the way they think and the form they live in spaces. Democratic approaches like participatory development planning might be helpful for the city in its way to more solidarity and sustainability regarding its social spatial – gender as well – development, in macro levels of social spatial planning and in micro levels of physical planning, in private space of house and in public spaces of the city.

A study on resident landscape perception through landscape image

Aiming at consensus building in environmental management with democratic procedure, a communication tool for mutual understanding is profoundly needed. The main purpose of this research is the establishment of a practical methodology to understand vernacular meanings of the environment in terms of resident landscape perception as a precondition for environmental discussion.

Beyond - Another view on space and landscape

Die Beiträge dieser Veröffentlichung sind aus Vorträgen anlässlich der Postdoc-Konferenz zu Ehren von Prof. Dr. Detlev Ipsen, der sich im September 2010 aus dem Universitätsdienst verabschiedete, entstanden. Das inhaltliche Kernprogramm der Postdoc-Konferenz war bewusst auf sehr unterschiedliche Perspektiven auf den Raum und die Raumwahrnehmung ausgerichtet und bildet sich auch in den Beiträgen dieser Veröffentlichung ab. Elisabeth Heidenreich widmet sich in ihrem Beitrag „Der moderne Dschihad und seine (sakralen) Räume“ den technischen Räumen des islamistischen Terrorismus. Hans-Ulrich Werner zeigt in seinem Beitrag „SoundScapes als Klang und Raum“ verschiedene Begegnungen der Musik- und Klangwissenschaft mit der Stadt- und Umweltplanung auf und setzt sich mit der Bedeutung und Transformation von „Klangräumen“ in der Planung auseinander. Der Beitrag von Susanne Kost „Kulturbedingte Unterschiede im Landschaftsbewusstsein – eine Annäherung“ analysiert, wie und wodurch sich bestimmte Handlungs- und Wahrnehmungsweisen in Kulturen entwickelt haben könnten und ob sich am Beispiel der Niederlande bestimmte Muster der Landschaftswahrnehmung identifizieren lassen. Ilya Maharika erörtert in seinem Beitrag „Urban Gene of Desakota. A Dynamic of Indonesian Urban-Rural Continuum with the Case of Yogyakarta Region” internationale Phänomene und Dynamiken im Stadt-Land-Gefüge.

Landschaftsperspektiven der Nutzer

Die vorliegende Arbeit macht Vorschläge zur Einbindung der Öffentlichkeit in Planungsbestrebungen vor Ort, wobei vor allem Methoden empirischer Sozialforschung und deren Anwendbarkeit in landschaftsplanerischen Vorhaben näher betrachtet werden. Hiermit finden insbesondere Wertezuweisungen durch die Bürger stärkere Berücksichtigung. Es wird angenommen, dass, um eine zukunftsweisende Landschaftsplanung zu etablieren, Planer und Fachleute lernen müssen, wie die lokale Bevölkerung ihre Umwelt wahrnimmt und empfindet und welche Ideen sie für die zukünftige Entwicklung der Landschaft haben. Als empirische Grundlage werden Fallstudien aus Bad Soden am Taunus, Hamburg-Wilhelmsburg und Kassel-Rothenditmold präsentiert und verglichen. Rothenditmold und Wilhelmsburg zeichnen sich durch hohe Einwohneranteile mit Migrationshintergrund aus, weisen relativ hohe Arbeitslosenquoten auf und sind als soziale Brennpunkte bekannt – zumindest für Außenstehende. Beide Stadtteile versuchen ihr Image aufzuwerten. In Wilhelmsburg wird dieses Vorhaben in die großräumigen Veränderungen eingebunden, die von verschiedenen Hamburger Großprojekten ausstrahlen. In Rothenditmold ist vor allem Eigeninitiative durch den Stadtteil selbst gefragt. In Bad Soden gibt es ebenfalls viele Menschen mit ausländischen Wurzeln. Sie gehören allerdings mehrheitlich der gesellschaftlichen Mittel- und Oberschicht an. Bad Soden verfügt über ein insgesamt positives Image, das aller kulturellen Veränderungen zum Trotz beibehalten werden soll. Entsprechende Initiativen gehen hier ebenfalls von der Gemeinde selbst aus. An allen Standorten hat es drastische Landschaftsveränderungen und speziell deren Erscheinung gegeben. Bad Soden und Wilhelmsburg haben dabei Teile ihres vormals ländlichen Charakters zu bewahren, während in Rothenditmold vor allem Zeugnisse aus der Zeit der Industrialisierung erhalten sind und den Ort prägen. Die Landschaften haben jeweils ihre einzigartigen Erscheinungen. Zumindest Teile der Landschaften ermöglichen eine Identifikation, sind attraktiv und liefern gute Erholungsmöglichkeiten. Um diese Qualitäten zu bewahren, müssen sie entsprechend gepflegt und weiter entwickelt werden. Dazu sind die Interessen und Wünsche der Bewohner zu ermitteln und in Planungen einzuarbeiten. Die Arbeit strebt einen Beitrag zur Lebensraumentwicklung für und mit Menschen an, die mittels ausgewählter Methoden der empirischen Sozialforschung eingebunden werden. Dabei wird gezeigt, dass die vorgestellten und erprobten Methoden sinnvoll in Projekte der Landschaftsplanung eingebunden werden können. Mit ihnen können ergänzende Erkenntnisse zum jeweiligen Landschaftsraum gewonnen werden, da sie helfen, die kollektive Wahrnehmung der Landschaft durch die Bevölkerung zu erfassen, um sie anschließend in Planungsentwürfe einbinden zu können. Mit der Untersuchung wird in den drei vorgestellten Fallstudien exemplarisch erfasst, welche Elemente der Landschaft für die Bewohner von besonderer Bedeutung sind. Darüber hinaus lernen Planer, welche Methoden zur Ermittlung emotionaler Landschaftswerte verfügbar sind und auf welcher Ebene der Landschaftsplanung sowie bei welchen Zielgruppen sie eingesetzt werden können. Durch die Verknüpfung landschaftsplanerischer Erfassungsmethoden mit Methoden der empirischen Sozialwissenschaft (Fragebogen, Interviews, „Spaziergangsinterviews“, gemeinsame Erarbeitung von Projekten bis zur Umsetzung) sowie der Möglichkeit zur Rückkoppelung landschaftsplaneri-scher Entwürfe mit der Bevölkerung wird eine Optimierung dieser Entwürfe sowohl im Sinne der Planer als auch im Sinne der Bürger erreicht. Zusätzlich wird die Wahrnehmung teilnehmender Bevölkerung für ihre Umwelt geschärft, da sie aufgefordert wird, sich mit ihrer Lebensumgebung bewusst auseinander zu setzen. Die Ergebnisse dieser Untersuchung sind Beitrag und Beleg zu der Annahme, dass ergänzende Methoden in der Landschaftsplanung zur stärkeren Interessenberücksichtigung der von Planung betroffenen Menschen benötigt werden. Zudem zeigen die Studien auf, wie man dem planungsethischen Anspruch, die Öffentlichkeit einzubeziehen, näher kommt. Resultat sind eine bessere Bewertung und Akzeptanz der Planungen und das nicht nur aus landschaftsplanerisch-fachlicher Sicht. Landschaftsplaner sollten ein Interesse daran haben, dass ihre Entwürfe ernst genommen und akzeptiert werden. Das schaffen sie, wenn sie der Bevölkerung nicht etwas aufplanen, sondern ihnen entsprechende Einflussmöglichkeiten bieten und Landschaft mit ihnen gemeinsam entwickeln.

Knowledge Building in Landscape Architecture

The objective of this study was to develop an internet-based seminar framework applicable for landscape architecture education. This process was accompanied by various aims. The basic expectation was to keep the main characteristics of landscape architecture education also in the online format. On top of that, four further objectives were anticipated: (1) training of competences for virtual team work, (2) fostering intercultural competence, (3) creation of equal opportunities for education through internet-based open access and (4) synergy effects and learning processes across institutional boundaries. This work started with the hypothesis that these four expected advantages would compensate for additional organisational efforts caused by the online delivery of the seminars and thus lead to a sustainable integration of this new learning mode into landscape architecture curricula. This rationale was followed by a presentation of four areas of knowledge to which the seminar development was directly related (1) landscape architecture as a subject and its pedagogy, (2) general learning theories, (3) developments in the ICT sector and (4) wider societal driving forces such as global citizenship and the increase of open educational resources. The research design took the shape of a pedagogical action research cycle. This approach was constructive: The author herself is teaching international landscape architecture students so that the model could directly be applied in practice. Seven online seminars were implemented in the period from 2008 to 2013 and this experience represents the core of this study. The seminars were conducted with varying themes while its pedagogy, organisation and the technological tools remained widely identical. The research design is further based on three levels of observation: (1) the seminar design on the basis of theory and methods from the learning sciences, in particular educational constructivism, (2) the seminar evaluation and (3) the evaluation of the seminars’ long term impact. The seminar model itself basically consists of four elements: (1) the taxonomy of learning objectives, (2) ICT tools and their application and pedagogy, (3) process models and (4) the case study framework. The seminar framework was followed by the presentation of the evaluation findings. The major findings of this study can be summed up as follows: Implementing online seminars across educational and national boundaries was possible both in term of organisation and technology. In particular, a high level of cultural diversity among the seminar participants has definitively been achieved. However, there were also obvious obstacles. These were primarily competing study commitments and incompatible schedules among the students attending from different academic programmes, partly even in different time zones. Both factors had negative impact on the individual and working group performances. With respect to the technical framework it can be concluded that the majority of the participants were able to use the tools either directly without any problem or after overcoming some smaller problems. Also the seminar wiki was intensively used for completing the seminar assignments. However, too less truly collaborative text production was observed which could be improved by changing the requirements for the collaborative task. Two different process models have been applied for guiding the collaboration of the small groups and both were in general successful. However, it needs to be said that even if the students were able to follow the collaborative task and to co-construct and compare case studies, most of them were not able to synthesize the knowledge they had compiled. This means that the area of consideration often remained on the level of the case and further reflections, generalisations and critique were largely missing. This shows that the seminar model needs to find better ways for triggering knowledge building and critical reflection. It was also suggested to have a more differentiated group building strategy in future seminars. A comparison of pre- and post seminar concept maps showed that an increase of factual and conceptual knowledge on the individual level was widely recognizable. Also the evaluation of the case studies (the major seminar output) revealed that the students have undergone developments of both the factual and the conceptual knowledge domain. Also their self-assessment with respect to individual learning development showed that the highest consensus was achieved in the field of subject-specific knowledge. The participants were much more doubtful with regard to the progress of generic competences such as analysis, communication and organisation. However, 50% of the participants confirmed that they perceived individual development on all competence areas the survey had asked for. Have the additional four targets been met? Concerning the competences for working in a virtual team it can be concluded that the vast majority was able to use the internet-based tools and to work with them in a target-oriented way. However, there were obvious differences regarding the intensity and activity of participation, both because of external and personal factors. A very positive aspect is the achievement of a high cultural diversity supporting the participants’ intercultural competence. Learning from group members was obviously a success factor for the working groups. Regarding the possibilities for better accessibility of educational opportunities it became clear that a significant number of participants were not able to go abroad during their studies because of financial or personal reasons. They confirmed that the online seminar was to some extent a compensation for not having been abroad for studying. Inter-institutional learning and synergy was achieved in so far that many teachers from different countries contributed with individual lectures. However, those teachers hardly ever followed more than one session. Therefore, the learning effect remained largely within the seminar learning group. Looking back at the research design it can be said that the pedagogical action research cycle was an appropriate and valuable approach allowing for strong interaction between theory and practice. However, some more external evaluation from peers in particular regarding the participants’ products would have been valuable.

Integrated Livelihoods and Landscape Approach for Smallholders in Northern Thailand

This paper examines the strategies and techniques researched and implemented by the International Union for Conservation of Nature (IUCN) in villages in the vicinity of Doi Mae Salong in Chiang Rai Province, Thailand. The strategies revolve around the paradigm linking poverty alleviation, conservation and landscape restoration. IUCN and its partners specifically researched and implemented schemes directed toward diversification of the household economy through alternative and sustainable intensified agriculture techniques based on balancing conservation and livelihood objectives. The projects aimed to reduce poverty and build the resilience of smallholders through decentralised governance arrangements including land use planning schemes and stakeholder negotiation. Considering the agro-ecological system on a catchment-wide scale enhances the conceptual understanding of each component, collectively forming a landscape matrix with requisite benefits for biodiversity, smallholder livelihoods and ecosystem services. In particular, the role of enhancing ecosystem services and functions in building socio-ecological resilience to vulnerabilities such as climate and economic variability is paramount in the process.