Not the outside but the inside matters : functional analysis of Capricious and Tartan during Drosophila tracheal morphogenesis

The tubular structures, which transport essential gases, liquids, or cells from one site to another, are shared among various divergent organisms. These highly organized tubular networks include lung, kidney, vasculature and mammary gland in mammals as well as trachea and salivary gland in Drosophila melanogaster. Many questions regarding the tubular morphogenesis cannot be addressed sufficiently by investigating the mammalian organs because their structures are extremely complex and therefore, systematic analyses of genetic and cellular programs guiding the development is not possible. In contrast, the Drosophila tracheal development provides an excellent model system since many molecular markers and powerful tools for genetic manipulations are available. Two mechanisms were shown to be important for the outgrowth of tracheal cells: the FGF signaling pathway and the interaction between the tracheal cells and the surrounding mesodermal cells. The Drosophila FGF ligand encoded by branchless (bnl) is localized in groups of cells near tracheal metameres. The tracheal cells expressing the FGF receptor breathless (btl) respond to these sources of FGF ligand and extend towards them. However, this FGF signaling pathway is not sufficient for the formation of continuous dorsal trunk, the only muticellular tube in tracheal system. Recently, it was found out that single mesodermal cells called bridge-cells are essential for the formation of continuous dorsal trunk as they direct the outgrowth of dorsal trunk cells towards the correct targets. The results in this PhD thesis demonstrate that a cell adhesion molecule Capricious (Caps), which is specifically localized on the surface of bridge-cells, plays an essential role in guiding the outgrowing dorsal trunk cells towards their correct targets. When caps is lacking, some bridge-cells cannot stretch properly towards the adjacent posterior tracheal metameres and thus fail to interconnect the juxtaposing dorsal trunk cells. Consequently, discontinuous dorsal trunks containing interruptions at several positions are formed. On the other hand, when caps is ectopically expressed in the mesodermal cells through a twi-GAL4 driver, these mesodermal cells acquire a guidance function through ectopic caps and misguide the outgrowing dorsal trunk cells in abnormal directions. As a result, disconnected dorsal trunks are formed. These loss- and gain-of-function studies suggest that Caps presumably establishes the cell-to-cell contact between the bridge-cells and the tracheal cells and thereby mediates directly the guidance function of bridge-cells. The most similar protein known to Caps is another cell adhesion molecule called Tartan (Trn). Interestingly, trn is expressed in the mesodermal cells but not in the bridge-cells. When trn is lacking, the outgrowth of not only the dorsal trunks but also the lateral trunks are disrupted. However, in contrast to the ectopic expression of caps, the misexpression of trn does not affect tracheal development. Whereas Trn requires only its extracellular domain to mediate the matrix function, Caps requires both its extracellular and intracellular domains to function as a guidance molecule in the bridge-cells. These observations suggest that Trn functions differently from Caps during tracheal morphogenesis. Presumably, Trn mediates a matrix function of mesodermal cells, which support the tracheal cells to extend efficiently through the surrounding mesodermal tissue. In order to determine which domains dictate the functional specificity of Caps, two hybrid proteins CapsEdTrnId, which contains the Caps extracellular domain and the Trn intracellular domain, and TrnEdCapsId, which consists of the Trn extracellular domain and the Caps intracellular domain, were constructed. Gain of function and rescue experiments with these hybrid proteins suggest on one hand that the extracellular domains of Caps and Trn are functionally redundant and on the other hand that the intracellular domain dictates the functional specificity of Caps. In order to identify putative interactors of Caps, yeast two-hybrid screening was performed. An in vivo interaction assay in yeast suggests that Ras64B interacts specifically with the Caps intracellular domain. In addition, an in vitro binding assay reveals a direct interaction between an inactive form of Ras64B and the Caps intracellular domain. ras64B, which encodes a small GTPase, is expressed in the mesodermal cells concurrently as caps. Finally, a gain-of-function study with the constitutively active Ras64B suggests that Ras64B presumably functions downstream of Caps. All these results suggest consistently that the small GTPase Ras64B binds specifically to the Caps intracellular domain and may thereby mediate the guidance function of Caps.

Studies of cap-independent mRNA translation in Drosophila melanogaster

Control of protein synthesis is a key step in the regulation of gene expression during apoptosis and the heat shock response. Under such conditions, cap-dependent translation is impaired and Internal Ribosome Entry Site (IRES)-dependent translation plays a major role in mammalian cells. Although the role of IRES-dependent translation during apoptosis has been mainly studied in mammals, its role in the translation of Drosophila apoptotic genes has not been yet studied. The observation that the Drosophila mutant embryos for the cap-binding protein, the eukaryotic initiation factor eIF4E, exhibits increased apoptosis in correlation with up-regulated proapoptotic gene reaper (rpr) transcription constitutes the first evidence for the existence of a cap-independent mechanism for the translation of Drosophila proapoptotic genes. The mechanism of translation of rpr and other proapoptotic genes was investigated in this work. We found that the 5 UTR of rpr mRNA drives translation in an IRES-dependent manner. It promotes the translation of reporter RNAs in vitro either in the absence of cap, in the presence of cap competitors, or in extracts derived from heat shocked and eIF4E mutant embryos and in vivo in cells transfected with reporters bearing a non functional cap structure, indicating that cap recognition is not required in rpr mRNA for translation. We also show that rpr mRNA 5 UTR exhibits a high degree of similarity with that of Drosophila heat shock protein 70 mRNA (hsp70), an antagonist of apoptosis, and that both are able to conduct IRES-mediated translation. The proapoptotic genes head involution defective (hid) and grim, but not sickle, also display IRES activity. Studies of mRNA association to polysomes in embryos indicate that both rpr, hsp70, hid and grim endogenous mRNAs are recruited to polysomes in embryos in which apoptosis or thermal stress was induced. We conclude that hsp70 and, on the other hand, rpr, hid and grim which are antagonizing factors during apoptosis, use a similar mechanism for protein synthesis. The outcome for the cell would thus depend on which protein is translated under a given stress condition. Factors involved in the differential translation driven by these IRES could play an important role. For this purpose, we undertook the identification of the ribonucleoprotein (RNP) complexes assembled onto the 5 UTR of rpr mRNA. We established a tobramycin-affinity-selection protocol that allows the purification of specific RNP that can be further analyzed by mass spectrometry. Several RNA binding proteins were identified as part of the rpr 5 UTR RNP complex, some of which have been related to IRES activity. The involvement of one of them, the La antigen, in the translation of rpr mRNA, was established by RNA-crosslinking experiments using recombinant protein and rpr 5 UTR and by the analysis of the translation efficiency of reporter mRNAs in Drosophila cells after knock down of the endogenous La by RNAi experiments. Several uncharacterized proteins were also identified, suggesting that they might play a role during translation, during the assembly of the translational machinery or in the priming of the mRNA before ribosome recognition. Our data provide evidence for the involvement of La antigen in the translation of rpr mRNA and set a protocol for purification of tagged-RNA-protein complexes from cytoplasmic extracts. To further understand the mechanisms of translation initiation in Drosophila, we analyzed the role of eIF4B on cap-dependent and cap-independent translation. We showed that eIF4B is mostly involved in cap-, but not IRES-dependent translation as it happens in mammals.

Analysen der beiden cis-regulierenden Sequenzelemente translational control element (TCE) und cytoplasmic polyadenylation element (CPE) in der Drosophila-Spermatogenese

Ein essentieller Bestandteil in dem Mechanismus der Translationskontrolle sind RNA-Pro­tein-Wechselwirkungen. Solche Interaktionen konnten in Translationssystemen an zwei unabhängigen cis-regulierenden Elementen durch in vitro-Bindungsanalysen mit individu­ellen rekombinanten Proteinen dokumentiert werden. Im Fall des translational control elements (TCE), welches ein konserviertes Sequenz-Ele­ment in der Mst(3)CGP-Genfamilie darstellt, wird eine negative Translationskontrolle durch die Bindung der Proteine CG3213, CG12470, CG1898, dFMR1, Exuperantia und Orb2 an diese Sequenz vermittelt (Stinski, 2011). Neben den in Bindungsstudien positiv getesteten Kandidaten dFMR1 und Orb2 (Stinski, 2011) wurde in der vorliegenden Dis­sertation CG3213 als weiterer direkter Bindungspartner an das TCE dokumentiert. Ein Abgleich der genomweiten Zusammenstellung von Proteininteraktionen in der Datenbank InterologFinder lieferte zwei weitere potentielle Kandidaten: CG34404 und CG3727. Al­lerdings schließen Northern-Analysen und das Proteinexpressionsmuster eine zentrale Rolle in der Drosophila-Spermatogenese für diese nahezu aus. In Kolokalisationsstudien einiger TCE-Komplex-Kandidaten mit CG3213 als Referenz konnten eindeutige Überein­stimmungen der Fluoreszenzmuster mit CG12470 in der postmeiotischen Phase be­schrieben werden, wohingegen mit Orb2 (postmeiotisch) und CG1898 (prämeiotisch) nur eine geringe Kolokalisation erkannt wurde. Punktstrukturen in den Verteilungsmustern sowohl von CG3213 als auch von CG12470 ließen sich nicht mit ER- und mitochondrien­spezifischen Markern korrelieren. Im Anschluss der Meiose konnte eine deutliche Intensitätserhöhung des CG3213-Proteins beobachtet werden, was eventuell durch eine veränderte Translationseffizienz zustande kommen könnte. Exuperantia (Exu) stellt einen bekannten Regulator für eine Reihe von translationskontrollierten mRNAs dar (Wang und Hazelrigg, 1994). Die Quantifizierungen der CG3213-mRNA in exu-mutantem Hintergrund bestätigen, dass auch die Transkript­menge der CG3213-mRNA durch Exu reguliert wird, was die obige Interpretation stützen würde. Für das zweite cis-regulierende Element, das cytoplasmic polyadenylation element (CPE), konnte eine direkte Bindung mit dem CPEB-Homolog in Drosophila (Orb2) gezeigt wer­den, welches auch eine Komponente des mst87F-RNP-Komplexes ist. Ein vermuteter Interaktionspartner dieses CPEBs ist Tob, weshalb die Verteilung beider Proteine in einem Kombinationsstamm verglichen wurde. In dem teilweise übereinstimmenden Fluoreszenz­muster ist Tob an den distalen Spermatidenenden auffallend konzentriert. Das gesamte Tob-Muster jedoch legt eine Verteilung in den Mitochondrien nahe, wie die MitoTracker®-Färbung belegt. Somit wurde erstmals ein Mitglied der Tob/BTG-Genfamilie in der Droso­phila-Spermatogenese mit Mitochondrien in Verbindung gebracht. Die Lokalisierung die­ser Proteine ist bislang unklar, jedoch konnte eine Kernlokalisation trotz der N-terminalen NLS-Sequenz mit Hilfe einer Kernfärbung ausgeschlossen werden.