1 resultado para Potential negative effects
em Boston College Law School, Boston College (BC), United States
Filtro por publicador
- Repository Napier (1)
- University of Cagliari UniCA Eprints (1)
- ABACUS. Repositorio de Producción Científica - Universidad Europea (1)
- Abertay Research Collections - Abertay University’s repository (2)
- Aberystwyth University Repository - Reino Unido (1)
- Adam Mickiewicz University Repository (1)
- AMS Tesi di Dottorato - Alm@DL - Università di Bologna (6)
- AMS Tesi di Laurea - Alm@DL - Università di Bologna (2)
- Aquatic Commons (13)
- ArchiMeD - Elektronische Publikationen der Universität Mainz - Alemanha (3)
- Archive of European Integration (3)
- Archivo Digital para la Docencia y la Investigación - Repositorio Institucional de la Universidad del País Vasco (11)
- Aston University Research Archive (14)
- Avian Conservation and Ecology - Eletronic Cientific Hournal - Écologie et conservation des oiseaux: (3)
- B-Digital - Universidade Fernando Pessoa - Portugal (4)
- Biblioteca de Teses e Dissertações da USP (1)
- Biblioteca Digital da Câmara dos Deputados (1)
- Biblioteca Digital da Produção Intelectual da Universidade de São Paulo (11)
- Biblioteca Digital da Produção Intelectual da Universidade de São Paulo (BDPI/USP) (5)
- Biblioteca Digital de la Universidad Católica Argentina (1)
- Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações Eletrônicas da UERJ (10)
- BORIS: Bern Open Repository and Information System - Berna - Suiça (35)
- Boston College Law School, Boston College (BC), United States (1)
- Boston University Digital Common (1)
- Brock University, Canada (11)
- CaltechTHESIS (3)
- Cambridge University Engineering Department Publications Database (5)
- CentAUR: Central Archive University of Reading - UK (74)
- Chinese Academy of Sciences Institutional Repositories Grid Portal (26)
- Cochin University of Science & Technology (CUSAT), India (1)
- Coffee Science - Universidade Federal de Lavras (1)
- Comissão Econômica para a América Latina e o Caribe (CEPAL) (19)
- CORA - Cork Open Research Archive - University College Cork - Ireland (3)
- Corvinus Research Archive - The institutional repository for the Corvinus University of Budapest (3)
- Dalarna University College Electronic Archive (5)
- Deakin Research Online - Australia (95)
- DI-fusion - The institutional repository of Université Libre de Bruxelles (1)
- Digital Commons - Michigan Tech (3)
- Digital Commons @ DU | University of Denver Research (4)
- Digital Commons at Florida International University (9)
- DigitalCommons@The Texas Medical Center (5)
- DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln (1)
- DRUM (Digital Repository at the University of Maryland) (1)
- Duke University (4)
- eResearch Archive - Queensland Department of Agriculture; Fisheries and Forestry (17)
- Glasgow Theses Service (1)
- Greenwich Academic Literature Archive - UK (3)
- Helda - Digital Repository of University of Helsinki (25)
- Indian Institute of Science - Bangalore - Índia (3)
- Instituto Nacional de Saúde de Portugal (1)
- Instituto Politécnico do Porto, Portugal (3)
- Instituto Superior de Psicologia Aplicada - Lisboa (2)
- Iowa Publications Online (IPO) - State Library, State of Iowa (Iowa), United States (1)
- Lume - Repositório Digital da Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul (2)
- Massachusetts Institute of Technology (2)
- Memorial University Research Repository (1)
- National Center for Biotechnology Information - NCBI (4)
- Open University Netherlands (1)
- Plymouth Marine Science Electronic Archive (PlyMSEA) (4)
- Portal de Revistas Científicas Complutenses - Espanha (1)
- Publishing Network for Geoscientific & Environmental Data (21)
- QSpace: Queen's University - Canada (2)
- QUB Research Portal - Research Directory and Institutional Repository for Queen's University Belfast (67)
- Queensland University of Technology - ePrints Archive (103)
- ReCiL - Repositório Científico Lusófona - Grupo Lusófona, Portugal (2)
- Repositório Alice (Acesso Livre à Informação Científica da Embrapa / Repository Open Access to Scientific Information from Embrapa) (1)
- Repositório Científico do Instituto Politécnico de Lisboa - Portugal (1)
- Repositório digital da Fundação Getúlio Vargas - FGV (15)
- Repositorio Institucional da UFLA (RIUFLA) (1)
- Repositório Institucional da Universidade de Aveiro - Portugal (4)
- Repositório Institucional da Universidade Estadual de São Paulo - UNESP (1)
- Repositório Institucional da Universidade Tecnológica Federal do Paraná (RIUT) (1)
- Repositório Institucional UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista "Julio de Mesquita Filho" (124)
- SAPIENTIA - Universidade do Algarve - Portugal (1)
- Savoirs UdeS : plateforme de diffusion de la production intellectuelle de l’Université de Sherbrooke - Canada (1)
- Scielo España (1)
- SerWisS - Server für Wissenschaftliche Schriften der Fachhochschule Hannover (1)
- Universidad de Alicante (5)
- Universidad del Rosario, Colombia (19)
- Universidad Politécnica de Madrid (13)
- Universidade de Lisboa - Repositório Aberto (1)
- Universidade Federal do Pará (2)
- Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Norte (UFRN) (12)
- Universita di Parma (1)
- Universitat de Girona, Spain (5)
- Universitätsbibliothek Kassel, Universität Kassel, Germany (12)
- Université de Lausanne, Switzerland (6)
- Université de Montréal, Canada (39)
- Université Laval Mémoires et thèses électroniques (1)
- University of Connecticut - USA (1)
- University of Michigan (2)
- University of Queensland eSpace - Australia (7)
- University of Washington (1)
- WestminsterResearch - UK (3)
- Worcester Research and Publications - Worcester Research and Publications - UK (1)
Resumo:
A comparative assessment of the successes and failures of the judicial reform efforts of El Salvador and Brazil in the 1980’s produces striking results. The reforms varied greatly in scope and were conducted in very different socio-political and economic backgrounds. While El Salvador’s reforms seemed narrow and ill-planned, on paper it appeared that Brazil’s broad reforms would be a successful model for any country with a fledgling democracy. Brazil’s reforms were an exercise in constitutionalism, implementing genuine separation of powers and receiving legislative and executive support. I was very surprised that these different approaches produced strikingly similar negative effects on the people’s assessment of the judiciary. From this outcome I concluded that while judicial reform of a corrupt or inefficient judiciary is an important step in ensuring the rule of law in society, it can not be the vehicle through which democratic reform is implemented. Quite to the contrary, for successful judicial reform to take place there must be considerable penetration of the law in society through enforcement of unbiased legislation, consistency in the laws and their enforcement, and sufficient time for the reform to have an effect on society.