1 resultado para Laic or free
em Boston College Law School, Boston College (BC), United States
Filtro por publicador
- Abertay Research Collections - Abertay University’s repository (1)
- Aberystwyth University Repository - Reino Unido (3)
- Academic Archive On-line (Stockholm University; Sweden) (1)
- Academic Research Repository at Institute of Developing Economies (1)
- Acceda, el repositorio institucional de la Universidad de Las Palmas de Gran Canaria. España (1)
- AMS Tesi di Dottorato - Alm@DL - Università di Bologna (2)
- Aquatic Commons (11)
- ArchiMeD - Elektronische Publikationen der Universität Mainz - Alemanha (3)
- Archive of European Integration (11)
- Archivo Digital para la Docencia y la Investigación - Repositorio Institucional de la Universidad del País Vasco (8)
- Aston University Research Archive (4)
- Biblioteca de Teses e Dissertações da USP (1)
- Biblioteca Digital da Produção Intelectual da Universidade de São Paulo (19)
- Biblioteca Digital da Produção Intelectual da Universidade de São Paulo (BDPI/USP) (21)
- Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações Eletrônicas da UERJ (1)
- Biodiversity Heritage Library, United States (1)
- BORIS: Bern Open Repository and Information System - Berna - Suiça (93)
- Boston College Law School, Boston College (BC), United States (1)
- Boston University Digital Common (3)
- Brock University, Canada (7)
- Bucknell University Digital Commons - Pensilvania - USA (2)
- CaltechTHESIS (5)
- Cambridge University Engineering Department Publications Database (76)
- CentAUR: Central Archive University of Reading - UK (66)
- Chinese Academy of Sciences Institutional Repositories Grid Portal (48)
- Cochin University of Science & Technology (CUSAT), India (3)
- Comissão Econômica para a América Latina e o Caribe (CEPAL) (8)
- CORA - Cork Open Research Archive - University College Cork - Ireland (2)
- Corvinus Research Archive - The institutional repository for the Corvinus University of Budapest (1)
- Dalarna University College Electronic Archive (2)
- Deakin Research Online - Australia (61)
- Department of Computer Science E-Repository - King's College London, Strand, London (2)
- DI-fusion - The institutional repository of Université Libre de Bruxelles (3)
- Digital Archives@Colby (1)
- Digital Commons - Michigan Tech (5)
- Digital Commons at Florida International University (2)
- Digital Knowledge Repository of Central Drug Research Institute (1)
- DigitalCommons - The University of Maine Research (2)
- DigitalCommons@The Texas Medical Center (5)
- DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln (4)
- Doria (National Library of Finland DSpace Services) - National Library of Finland, Finland (1)
- DRUM (Digital Repository at the University of Maryland) (1)
- Duke University (6)
- eResearch Archive - Queensland Department of Agriculture; Fisheries and Forestry (8)
- Gallica, Bibliotheque Numerique - Bibliothèque nationale de France (French National Library) (BnF), France (1)
- Greenwich Academic Literature Archive - UK (5)
- Harvard University (2)
- Helda - Digital Repository of University of Helsinki (7)
- Indian Institute of Science - Bangalore - Índia (54)
- Institutional Repository of Leibniz University Hannover (1)
- Instituto Politécnico de Santarém (1)
- Instituto Politécnico do Porto, Portugal (5)
- Lume - Repositório Digital da Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul (1)
- Massachusetts Institute of Technology (1)
- Memoria Académica - FaHCE, UNLP - Argentina (9)
- Memorial University Research Repository (1)
- National Center for Biotechnology Information - NCBI (40)
- Plymouth Marine Science Electronic Archive (PlyMSEA) (4)
- Publishing Network for Geoscientific & Environmental Data (4)
- QUB Research Portal - Research Directory and Institutional Repository for Queen's University Belfast (68)
- Queensland University of Technology - ePrints Archive (63)
- Repositório digital da Fundação Getúlio Vargas - FGV (1)
- Repositório Institucional da Universidade Estadual de São Paulo - UNESP (1)
- Repositório Institucional da Universidade Federal do Rio Grande - FURG (1)
- Repositório Institucional UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista "Julio de Mesquita Filho" (97)
- Royal College of Art Research Repository - Uninet Kingdom (1)
- SAPIENTIA - Universidade do Algarve - Portugal (1)
- Scientific Open-access Literature Archive and Repository (1)
- South Carolina State Documents Depository (1)
- The Scholarly Commons | School of Hotel Administration; Cornell University Research (1)
- Universidad de Alicante (5)
- Universidad del Rosario, Colombia (3)
- Universidad Politécnica de Madrid (21)
- Universidade Estadual Paulista "Júlio de Mesquita Filho" (UNESP) (1)
- Universidade Federal do Pará (2)
- Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Norte (UFRN) (1)
- Universitat de Girona, Spain (2)
- Universitätsbibliothek Kassel, Universität Kassel, Germany (5)
- Université de Montréal, Canada (5)
- University of Michigan (42)
- University of Queensland eSpace - Australia (3)
- University of Washington (2)
- WestminsterResearch - UK (2)
- Worcester Research and Publications - Worcester Research and Publications - UK (1)
Resumo:
The emerging U.S. approach linking free trade to domestic labor protections is a practical framework on which to base substantive and procedural rights. Nevertheless, much more can be done in future agreements to improve these safeguards for workers in a way that will maximize the gains from trade and reduce the most harmful effects of development. In order to improve future agreements, the U.S. should expand access to consultations within the dispute resolution mechanism, focus complaints on core rights such as organization and bargaining, encourage the development of small independent unions in corporatist cultures, and incorporate the ILO into the dispute settlement process. Finally, the civil law systems of Central America and the Anglo-American common law system may have fundamentally different understandings of the rule of law. This difference in understanding may pose a significant disadvantage for developing or civil law systems entering treaties with the U.S., and should be better understood by both sides in order to maintain the credibility of the law and the effectiveness of the treaty.