On cultural property and its protection: a law-and-economics comment

The term cultural property seems to have come into vogue after the Second World War as part of efforts to prevent the recurrence of the massive war-time destruction of objects of cultural significance to various groups and, in some cases, to all of humanity. The 1954 Convention for the Protection of Cultural Property in the Event of Armed Conflict symbolises those efforts. Destruction is not the only doomsday scenario for cultural property. Removal of objects from their owners or region of origin is another concern. This, too, had occurred during the Second World War with the nazis’ looting treasures of all kinds from occupied territories, not to mention the massive confiscation of the property of their Jewish victims everywhere. But the concern was older, as Merryman for one shows in the story of the Elgin marbles, brought from Greece to England during the 19th century. This concern has found expression in a 1970 UNESCO treaty and in a 1995 Unidroit Convention seeking to halt international traffic in cultural property.

Le marché de l'art et le trafic illicite des biens culturels : une étude de cas : la collection Barbier-Mueller.

En mars 2013, trois cent treize artefacts précolombiens, exposés auparavant dans le musée barcelonais des Suisses Jean-Paul Barbier et Monique Mueller, furent mis en vente chez Sotheby’s à Paris par ce couple de collectionneurs. L’affaire fut l’objet une couverture médiatique internationale lorsque des pays d’Amérique centrale et d’Amérique du Sud, notamment le Pérou, le Mexique et le Guatemala, protestèrent contre la tenue de cette vente, avançant que leur patrimoine culturel national n’est pas à vendre. La question centrale de ce mémoire porte sur le trafic illicite des biens culturels et elle se décline en trois axes, à partir d’une étude de cas : la collection Barbier-Mueller. Les relations complexes entre les musées et les grands collectionneurs sont observées dans le premier chapitre à la lumière des règles déontologiques qui régissent habituellement les institutions, afin de ne pas encourager l’acquisition d’objets impliqués dans des transactions illicites. Dans un deuxième temps, au moyen d’une succincte présentation du marché actuel de l’art mondial, l’influence des maisons de ventes aux enchères sera examinée. Tandis que la provenance des artefacts en vente n’est pas toujours clairement affichée, il est difficile de retracer la lignée des propriétaires ou leur nation d’origine. Or, sachant que la commercialisation illicite des biens culturels se développe à l’intérieur même du marché de l'art régulier, les auteurs parlent alors d’un « marché gris ». Ce mémoire remonte, depuis l’excavation en passant par leur exportation illégale, la chaîne de transactions de ces biens culturels qui aboutissent dans les expositions des plus prestigieuses institutions. Cette recherche aborde en dernier lieu certaines incongruités du marché de l’art en auscultant les particularités des outils fournis par l’UNESCO et l’ICOM, ainsi que la question de l’aliénation, en plus de celle des limites juridiques des pays requérants. Finalement, cette étude présente les oppositions entre le discours officiel et les actions réellement entreprises pour la protection du patrimoine culturel.

Faulkner revisited : narrating property, race, gender and history in William Faulkner's Go Down, Moses, Toni Morrison's Song of Solomon and Gloria Naylor's Mama Day

My thesis explores the formation of the subject in the novels of Faulkner’s Go Down, Moses, Toni Morrison’s Song of Solomon, and Gloria Naylor’s Mama Day. I attach the concept of property in terms of how male protagonists are obsessed with materialistic ownership and with the subordination of women who, as properties, consolidate their manhood. The three novelists despite their racial, gendered, and literary differences share the view that identity and truth are mere social and cultural constructs. I incorporate the work of Judith Butler and other poststructuralist figures, who see identity as a matter of performance rather than a natural entity. My thesis explores the theme of freedom, which I attached to the ways characters use their bodies either to confine or to emancipate themselves from the restricting world of race, class, and gender. The three novelists deconstruct any system of belief that promulgates the objectivity of truth in historical documents. History in the three novels, as with the protagonists, perception of identity, remains a social construct laden with distortions to serve particular political or ideological agendas. My thesis gives voice to African American female characters who are associated with love and racial and gender resistance. They become the reservoirs of the African American legacy in terms of their association with the oral and intuitionist mode of knowing, which subverts the male characters’ obsession with property and with the mainstream empiricist world. In this dissertation, I use the concept of hybridity as a literary and theoretical devise that African-American writers employ. In effect, I embark on the postcolonial studies of Henry Louise Gates, Paul Gilroy, W. E. B Du Bois, James Clifford, and Arjun Appadurai in order to reflect upon the fluidity of Morrison’s and Naylor’s works. I show how these two novelists subvert Faulkner’s essentialist perception of truth, and of racial and gendered identity. They associate the myth of the Flying African with the notion of hybridity by making their male protagonists criss-cross Northern and Southern regions. I refer to Mae Gwendolyn Henderson’s article on “Speaking in Tongues” in my analysis of how Naylor subverts the patriarchal text of both Faulkner and Morrison in embarking on a more feminine version of the flying African, which she relates to an ex-slave, Sapphira Wade, a volatile female character who resists fixed claim over her story and identity. In dealing with the concept of hybridity, I show that Naylor rewrites both authors’ South by making Willow Springs a more fluid space, an assumption that unsettles the scores of critics who associate the island with authenticity and exclusive rootedness.