La mise en exposition des œuvres d'art spoliées par les nazis : étude de cas de l'exposition de la collection de Jacques Goudstikker

Pour respecter les droits d'auteur, la version électronique de ce mémoire a été dépouillée de ses documents visuels et audiovisuels. La version intégrale du mémoire a été déposée au Service de la gestion des documents et des archives de l'Université de Montréal.

Le marché de l'art et le trafic illicite des biens culturels : une étude de cas : la collection Barbier-Mueller.

En mars 2013, trois cent treize artefacts précolombiens, exposés auparavant dans le musée barcelonais des Suisses Jean-Paul Barbier et Monique Mueller, furent mis en vente chez Sotheby’s à Paris par ce couple de collectionneurs. L’affaire fut l’objet une couverture médiatique internationale lorsque des pays d’Amérique centrale et d’Amérique du Sud, notamment le Pérou, le Mexique et le Guatemala, protestèrent contre la tenue de cette vente, avançant que leur patrimoine culturel national n’est pas à vendre. La question centrale de ce mémoire porte sur le trafic illicite des biens culturels et elle se décline en trois axes, à partir d’une étude de cas : la collection Barbier-Mueller. Les relations complexes entre les musées et les grands collectionneurs sont observées dans le premier chapitre à la lumière des règles déontologiques qui régissent habituellement les institutions, afin de ne pas encourager l’acquisition d’objets impliqués dans des transactions illicites. Dans un deuxième temps, au moyen d’une succincte présentation du marché actuel de l’art mondial, l’influence des maisons de ventes aux enchères sera examinée. Tandis que la provenance des artefacts en vente n’est pas toujours clairement affichée, il est difficile de retracer la lignée des propriétaires ou leur nation d’origine. Or, sachant que la commercialisation illicite des biens culturels se développe à l’intérieur même du marché de l'art régulier, les auteurs parlent alors d’un « marché gris ». Ce mémoire remonte, depuis l’excavation en passant par leur exportation illégale, la chaîne de transactions de ces biens culturels qui aboutissent dans les expositions des plus prestigieuses institutions. Cette recherche aborde en dernier lieu certaines incongruités du marché de l’art en auscultant les particularités des outils fournis par l’UNESCO et l’ICOM, ainsi que la question de l’aliénation, en plus de celle des limites juridiques des pays requérants. Finalement, cette étude présente les oppositions entre le discours officiel et les actions réellement entreprises pour la protection du patrimoine culturel.

Tracing change in World Cultural Heritage : the recognition of intangible heritage

This thesis investigates the crossover from and intersection between tangible and intangible heritage in the context of World Heritage. Since the start of the twenty-first century, intangible heritage has become increasingly important in international cultural heritage conservation theory and practice. In heritage literature, intangible heritage has been theorized in relation to tangible or built heritage, thereby extending the definition of cultural heritage to consider a holistic perspective. New heritage conservation instruments have been created for the protection of intangible heritage, such as most prominently the 2003 UNESCO Convention for the Safeguarding of the Intangible Cultural Heritage. The changing conception of cultural heritage that goes beyond tangible heritage has also influenced existing instruments like the 1972 UNESCO Convention concerning the protection of the World Cultural and Natural Heritage. The thesis studies how intangible heritage has been recognized and interpreted in implementing the concept of cultural heritage as defined by the World Heritage Convention. It examines the historical development of the concept of World Cultural Heritage with the aim of tracing the construction of intangible heritage in this context. The thesis consists of six chapters. The introduction sets out the research problem and research question. In the literature review, international cultural heritage conservation is portrayed as the research context, the knowledge gap between World Heritage and intangible heritage is identified and an understanding of the research problem deepened, and methods from similar research in the subject area are presented. The methodology in the third chapter describes choices made concerning the research paradigm, research approach and strategy, the use of concepts and illustrative examples, as well as data collection and analysis methods. Knowledge is constructed using primarily a historical approach and related methods. Through the analysis of pertinent documents and heritage discourses, an understanding of the concept of intangible heritage is developed and the concept of World Cultural Heritage is investigated. In the fourth chapter, intangible heritage is studied by looking at specific cultural heritage discourses, that is, a scientific, a UNESCO, and an ICOMOS discourse. Intangible heritage is theorized in relation to the concepts of tangible heritage, heritage value, and cultural heritage. Knowledge gained in this chapter serves as a theoretical lens to trace the recognition of and tease out interpretations of intangible heritage in the context of implementing the concept of World Cultural Heritage. The results are presented in chapter five. A historical development is portrayed in five time periods and for the concepts of cultural heritage, Outstanding Universal Value, the criteria to assess World Heritage value, and authenticity. The conclusion summarizes the main outcomes, assesses the thesis’ contribution to scientific knowledge as well as its limitations, and outlines possible further research. The main results include the identification of the term intangible heritage as an indicator for a paradigm shift and a new approach to conceiving cultural heritage in international cultural heritage conservation. By focusing on processes and the living relationship between people and their environment or place, intangible heritage emphasizes the anthropological. In the context of this conception, intangible heritage takes on two meanings. First, value is attributed by people and hence, is inherently immaterial. Secondly, place is constituted of a tangible-intangible continuum in terms of attributes. A paradigm shift and increasing recognition of an anthropological approach to cultural heritage were identified for all discourses, that is, UNESCO, ICOMOS, the scientific field, and World Heritage. For World Heritage, intangible heritage was recognized indirectly in terms of historical associations during the 1970s and 1980s. The anthropological shift occurred in the early 1990s. The term intangible was introduced and the meaning of intangible heritage was extended to include cultural associations. The subsequent decade is characterized by a process of internalization and implementation of the new approach to cultural heritage. The 2003 Intangible Cultural Heritage Convention created momentum. By the early 2010s, while not explicitly recognizing the immaterial character of values, a holistic approach to cultural heritage was fully endorsed that considers the idea of intangible attributes as carriers of values. An understanding of the recognition of intangible heritage through the implementation of the World Heritage Convention and scientific research in general provide an important knowledge base for implementing the Convention in a more coherent, objective, and well-informed way.