3 resultados para Gut bacteria
em Université de Montréal, Canada
Resumo:
Les biofilms sont des communautés structurées de micro-organismes enrobées dans une matrice extracellulaire. Les biofilms sont impliqués dans la persistance de plusieurs maladies infectieuses et la matrice extracellulaire du biofilm protège les bactéries contre les cellules du système immunitaire de l'hôte, les antibiotiques et les désinfectants. Récemment notre laboratoire a démontré que le zinc inhibe la formation de biofilm chez Actinobacillus pleuropneumoniae, une bactérie pathogène du porc. Le but de cette étude est d'évaluer l'effet du zinc sur la croissance et la formation du biofilm chez différentes bactéries pathogènes du porc, telles que Bordetella bronchiseptica, Escherichia coli, Haemophilus parasuis, Salmonella, Staphylococcus aureus et Streptococcus suis. Les bactéries ont été cultivées dans des plaques de 96 puits sous condition optimale de formation de biofilm et les biofilms ont été colorés au cristal violet. La présence du biofilm a été confirmée par microscopie confocale à balayage laser à l’aide du marqueur fluorescent FilmTracerTM FM ® 1-43. À des concentrations micromolaires, le zinc inhibe faiblement la croissance bactérienne et bloque d'une manière dose-dépendante la formation de biofilm d’A. pleuropneumoniae, Salmonella Typhimurium et H. parasuis. De plus, la formation de biofilm de E. coli, S. aureus et S. suis a été faiblement inhibée par le zinc. Nos résultats indiquent que le zinc a un effet inhibiteur sur la formation de biofilm de la plupart des pathogènes bactériens d'origine porcine. Cependant, le mécanisme sous-jacent de l'activité anti-biofilm du zinc reste à être caractérisé.
Resumo:
Background: Campylobacter jejuni is responsible for human foodborne enteritis. This bacterium is a remarkable colonizer of the chicken gut, with some strains outcompeting others for colonization. To better understand this phenomenon, the objective of this study was to extensively characterize the phenotypic performance of C. jejuni chicken strains and associate their gut colonizing ability with specific genes. Results: C. jejuni isolates (n = 45) previously analyzed for the presence of chicken colonization associated genes were further characterized for phenotypic properties influencing colonization: autoagglutination and chemotaxis as well as adhesion to and invasion of primary chicken caecal cells. This allowed strains to be ranked according to their in vitro performance. After their in vitro capacity to outcompete was demonstrated in vivo, strains were then typed by comparative genomic fingerprinting (CGF). In vitro phenotypical properties displayed a linear variability among the tested strains. Strains possessing higher scores for phenotypical properties were able to outcompete others during chicken colonization trials. When the gene content of strains was compared, some were associated with different phenotypical scores and thus with different outcompeting capacities. Use of CGF profiles showed an extensive genetic variability among the studied strains and suggested that the outcompeting capacity is not predictable by CGF profile. Conclusion: This study revealed a wide array of phenotypes present in C. jejuni strains, even though they were all recovered from chicken caecum. Each strain was classified according to its in vitro competitive potential and its capacity to compete for chicken gut colonization was associated with specific genes. This study also exposed the disparity existing between genetic typing and phenotypical behavior of C. jejuni strains.
Resumo:
Campylobacter jejuni is an important zoonotic foodborne pathogen causing acute gastroenteritis in humans. Chickens are often colonized at very high numbers by C. jejuni, up to 109 CFU per gram of caecal content, with no detrimental effects on their health. Farm control strategies are being developed to lower the C. jejuni contamination of chicken food products in an effort to reduce human campylobacteriosis incidence. It is believed that intestinal microbiome composition may affect gut colonization by such undesirable bacteria but, although the chicken microbiome is being increasingly characterized, information is lacking on the factors affecting its modulation, especially by foodborne pathogens. This study monitored the effects of C. jejuni chicken caecal colonization on the chicken microbiome in healthy chickens. It also evaluated the capacity of a feed additive to affect caecal bacterial populations and to lower C. jejuni colonization. From day-0, chickens received or not a microencapsulated feed additive and were inoculated or not with C. jejuni at 14 days of age. Fresh caecal content was harvested at 35 days of age. The caecal microbiome was characterized by real time quantitative PCR and Ion Torrent sequencing. We observed that the feed additive lowered C. jejuni caecal count by 0.7 log (p<0.05). Alpha-diversity of the caecal microbiome was not affected by C. jejuni colonization or by the feed additive. C. jejuni colonization modified the caecal beta-diversity while the feed additive did not. We observed that C. jejuni colonization was associated with an increase of Bifidobacterium and affected Clostridia and Mollicutes relative abundances. The feed additive was associated with a lower Streptococcus relative abundance. The caecal microbiome remained relatively unchanged despite high C. jejuni colonization. The feed additive was efficient in lowering C. jejuni colonization while not disturbing the caecal microbiome.