Study on the activation of the biceps brachii compartments in normal subjects

Les prothèses myoélectriques modernes peuvent être dotées de plusieurs degrés de liberté ce qui nécessite plusieurs signaux musculaires pour en exploiter pleinement les capacités. Pour obtenir plus de signaux, il nous a semblé prometteur d'expérimenter si les 6 compartiments du biceps brachial pouvaient être mis sous tension de façon volontaire et obtenir ainsi 6 signaux de contrôle au lieu d'un seul comme actuellement. Des expériences ont donc été réalisées avec 10 sujets normaux. Des matrices d'électrodes ont été placées en surface au-dessus du chef court et long du biceps pour recueillir les signaux électromyographiques (EMG) générés par le muscle lors de contractions effectuées alors que les sujets étaient soit assis, le coude droit fléchi ~ 100 ° ou debout avec le bras droit tendu à l'horizontale dans le plan coronal (sur le côté). Dans ces deux positions, la main était soit en supination, soit en position neutre, soit en pronation. L'amplitude des signaux captés au-dessus du chef court du muscle a été comparée à ceux obtenus à partir du chef long. Pour visualiser la forme du biceps sous les électrodes l'imagerie ultrasonore a été utilisée. En fonction de la tâche à accomplir, l'activité EMG a était plus importante soit dans un chef ou dans l'autre. Le fait de pouvoir activer préférentiellement l'un des 2 chefs du biceps, même si ce n'est pas encore de façon complètement indépendante, suggère que l'utilisation sélective des compartiments pourrait être une avenue possible pour faciliter le contrôle des prothèses myoélectriques du membre supérieur.

Propidium monoazide (PMA) and ethidium bromide monoazide(EMA) improve DNA array and high-throughput sequencing ofporcine reproductive and respiratory syndrome virus identification

Pan-viral DNA array (PVDA) and high-throughput sequencing (HTS) are useful tools to identify novel viruses of emerging diseases. However, both techniques have difficulties to identify viruses in clinical samples because of the host genomic nucleic acid content (hg/cont). Both propidium monoazide (PMA) and ethidium bromide monoazide (EMA) have the capacity to bind free DNA/RNA, but are cell membrane-impermeable. Thus, both are unable to bind protected nucleic acid such as viral genomes within intact virions. However, EMA/PMA modified genetic material cannot be amplified by enzymes. In order to assess the potential of EMA/PMA to lower the presence of amplifiable hg/cont in samples and improve virus detection, serum and lung tissue homogenates were spiked with porcine reproductive and respiratory virus (PRRSV) and were processed with EMA/PMA. In addition, PRRSV RT-qPCR positive clinical samples were also tested. EMA/PMA treatments significantly decreased amplifiable hg/cont and significantly increased the number of PVDA positive probes and their signal intensity compared to untreated spiked lung samples. EMA/PMA treatments also increased the sensitivity of HTS by increasing the number of specific PRRSV reads and the PRRSV percentage of coverage. Interestingly, EMA/PMA treatments significantly increased the sensitivity of PVDA and HTS in two out of three clinical tissue samples. Thus, EMA/PMA treatments offer a new approach to lower the amplifiable hg/cont in clinical samples and increase the success of PVDA and HTS to identify viruses.

Pelvic-Floor Rehabilitation, Part 1 : Comparison of Two Surface Electrode Placements During Stimulation of the Pelvic-Floor Musculature in Women Who Are Continent Using Bipolar Interferential Currents

Background and Purpose. Electrical stimulation of the pelvic floor is used as an adjunct in the conservative treatment of urinary incontinence. No consensus exists, however, regarding electrode placements for optimal stimulation of the pelvic-floor musculature. The purpose of this study was to compare two different bipolar electrode placements, one suggested by Laycock and Green (L2) the other by Dumoulin (D2), during electrical stimulation with interferential currents of the pelvic-floor musculature in continent women, using a two-group crossover design. Subjects. Ten continent female volunteers, ranging in age from 20 to 39 years (X̅=27.3, SD=5.6), were randomly assigned to one of two study groups. Methods. Each study group received neuromuscular electrical stimulation (NMES) of the pelvic-floor musculature using both electrode placements, the order of application being reversed for each group. Force of contraction was measured as pressure (in centimeters of water [cm H2O]) exerted on a vaginal pressure probe attached to a manometer. Data were analyzed using a two-way, mixed-model analysis of variance. Results. No difference in pressure was observed between the two electrode placements. Differences in current amplitude were observed, with the D2 electrode placement requiring less current amplitude to produce a maximum recorded pressure on the manometer. Subjective assessment by the subjects revealed a preference for the D2 electrode placement (7 of 10 subjects). Conclusion and Discussion. The lower current amplitudes required with the D2 placement to obtain recordings comparable to those obtained with the L2 technique suggest a more comfortable stimulation of the pelvic-floor muscles. The lower current amplitudes required also suggest that greater increases in pressure might be obtained with the D2 placement by increasing the current amplitude while remaining within the comfort threshold. These results will help to define treatment guidelines for a planned clinical study investigating the effects of NMES and exercise in the treatment of urinary stress incontinence in women postpartum.