1 resultado para Aleph Version 16
em Centro Hospitalar do Porto
Filtro por publicador
- JISC Information Environment Repository (3)
- Repository Napier (1)
- Abertay Research Collections - Abertay University’s repository (4)
- Aberystwyth University Repository - Reino Unido (2)
- Academic Archive On-line (Jönköping University; Sweden) (1)
- Adam Mickiewicz University Repository (1)
- Aquatic Commons (58)
- ArchiMeD - Elektronische Publikationen der Universität Mainz - Alemanha (1)
- Archive of European Integration (3)
- Archivo Digital para la Docencia y la Investigación - Repositorio Institucional de la Universidad del País Vasco (11)
- B-Digital - Universidade Fernando Pessoa - Portugal (1)
- Biblioteca Digital da Câmara dos Deputados (11)
- Biblioteca Digital da Produção Intelectual da Universidade de São Paulo (2)
- Biblioteca Digital de la Universidad Católica Argentina (3)
- Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações Eletrônicas da UERJ (9)
- Bioline International (3)
- BORIS: Bern Open Repository and Information System - Berna - Suiça (4)
- Boston University Digital Common (7)
- Brock University, Canada (1)
- CaltechTHESIS (4)
- Cambridge University Engineering Department Publications Database (33)
- CentAUR: Central Archive University of Reading - UK (3)
- Center for Jewish History Digital Collections (2)
- Centro Hospitalar do Porto (1)
- Chinese Academy of Sciences Institutional Repositories Grid Portal (72)
- Comissão Econômica para a América Latina e o Caribe (CEPAL) (2)
- CORA - Cork Open Research Archive - University College Cork - Ireland (41)
- CUNY Academic Works (3)
- Duke University (2)
- eResearch Archive - Queensland Department of Agriculture; Fisheries and Forestry (1)
- Funes: Repositorio digital de documentos en Educación Matemática - Colombia (5)
- Greenwich Academic Literature Archive - UK (3)
- Helda - Digital Repository of University of Helsinki (14)
- Indian Institute of Science - Bangalore - Índia (43)
- Instituto Politécnico de Viseu (2)
- Memoria Académica - FaHCE, UNLP - Argentina (3)
- Ministerio de Cultura, Spain (3)
- National Center for Biotechnology Information - NCBI (1)
- Open University Netherlands (1)
- Plymouth Marine Science Electronic Archive (PlyMSEA) (9)
- Portal de Revistas Científicas Complutenses - Espanha (6)
- Publishing Network for Geoscientific & Environmental Data (281)
- QUB Research Portal - Research Directory and Institutional Repository for Queen's University Belfast (74)
- Queensland University of Technology - ePrints Archive (218)
- Repositório Científico da Universidade de Évora - Portugal (1)
- Repositório Científico do Instituto Politécnico de Lisboa - Portugal (2)
- Repositorio de la Universidad de Cuenca (1)
- Repositório Institucional da Universidade Estadual de São Paulo - UNESP (1)
- Repositório Institucional da Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Norte (1)
- Repositorio Institucional de la Universidad Nacional Agraria (5)
- Repositório Institucional UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista "Julio de Mesquita Filho" (7)
- RUN (Repositório da Universidade Nova de Lisboa) - FCT (Faculdade de Cienecias e Technologia), Universidade Nova de Lisboa (UNL), Portugal (1)
- Universidad de Alicante (1)
- Universidad Politécnica de Madrid (1)
- Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Norte (UFRN) (2)
- Universidade Metodista de São Paulo (3)
- Universitat de Girona, Spain (1)
- Université de Lausanne, Switzerland (1)
- Université de Montréal, Canada (2)
- University of Michigan (2)
Resumo:
OBJETIVE to create a reduced version of the QASCI, which is structurally equivalent to the long one and meets the criteria of reliability and validity. METHOD Through secondary data from previous studies, the participants were divided into two samples, one for the development of reduced version and the second for study of the factorial validity. Participants responded to QASCI, the SF 36, the ADHS and demographic questions. RESULTS A reduced version of 14 items showed adequate psychometric properties of validity and internal consistency, adapted to a heptadimensional structure that assesses positive and negative aspects of care. CONCLUSION Confirmatory factor analysis revealed a good fit with the advocated theoretical model.