1 resultado para Triple Frontera
em Brock University, Canada
Filtro por publicador
- Aberdeen University (1)
- Academic Archive On-line (Jönköping University; Sweden) (1)
- Acceda, el repositorio institucional de la Universidad de Las Palmas de Gran Canaria. España (8)
- AMS Tesi di Dottorato - Alm@DL - Università di Bologna (2)
- AMS Tesi di Laurea - Alm@DL - Università di Bologna (2)
- Andina Digital - Repositorio UASB-Digital - Universidade Andina Simón Bolívar (22)
- Aquatic Commons (1)
- ArchiMeD - Elektronische Publikationen der Universität Mainz - Alemanha (2)
- Archive of European Integration (1)
- Archivo Digital para la Docencia y la Investigación - Repositorio Institucional de la Universidad del País Vasco (4)
- Argos - Repositorio Institucional de la Secretaría de Investigación y Postgrado de la Facultad de Humanidades y Ciencias Sociales de la Universidad Nacional de Misiones (19)
- Aston University Research Archive (2)
- Biblioteca de Teses e Dissertações da USP (1)
- Biblioteca Digital | Sistema Integrado de Documentación | UNCuyo - UNCUYO. UNIVERSIDAD NACIONAL DE CUYO. (7)
- Biblioteca Digital da Produção Intelectual da Universidade de São Paulo (6)
- Biblioteca Digital da Produção Intelectual da Universidade de São Paulo (BDPI/USP) (5)
- Biblioteca Digital de la Universidad Católica Argentina (4)
- Bioline International (1)
- BORIS: Bern Open Repository and Information System - Berna - Suiça (47)
- Brock University, Canada (1)
- Bucknell University Digital Commons - Pensilvania - USA (3)
- Bulgarian Digital Mathematics Library at IMI-BAS (1)
- CaltechTHESIS (2)
- Cambridge University Engineering Department Publications Database (10)
- CentAUR: Central Archive University of Reading - UK (9)
- Chinese Academy of Sciences Institutional Repositories Grid Portal (17)
- Cochin University of Science & Technology (CUSAT), India (2)
- Comissão Econômica para a América Latina e o Caribe (CEPAL) (30)
- CORA - Cork Open Research Archive - University College Cork - Ireland (1)
- DI-fusion - The institutional repository of Université Libre de Bruxelles (2)
- Digital Commons - Michigan Tech (1)
- DigitalCommons@The Texas Medical Center (3)
- eResearch Archive - Queensland Department of Agriculture; Fisheries and Forestry (3)
- FAUBA DIGITAL: Repositorio institucional científico y académico de la Facultad de Agronomia de la Universidad de Buenos Aires (2)
- Gallica, Bibliotheque Numerique - Bibliothèque nationale de France (French National Library) (BnF), France (9)
- Helda - Digital Repository of University of Helsinki (10)
- Helvia: Repositorio Institucional de la Universidad de Córdoba (1)
- Indian Institute of Science - Bangalore - Índia (35)
- Institutional Repository of Leibniz University Hannover (1)
- Memoria Académica - FaHCE, UNLP - Argentina (213)
- Ministerio de Cultura, Spain (33)
- National Center for Biotechnology Information - NCBI (9)
- Nottingham eTheses (1)
- Portal de Revistas Científicas Complutenses - Espanha (1)
- Publishing Network for Geoscientific & Environmental Data (14)
- QUB Research Portal - Research Directory and Institutional Repository for Queen's University Belfast (30)
- Queensland University of Technology - ePrints Archive (143)
- Repositorio Académico de la Universidad Nacional de Costa Rica (5)
- Repositorio Academico Digital UANL (1)
- Repositório Alice (Acesso Livre à Informação Científica da Embrapa / Repository Open Access to Scientific Information from Embrapa) (1)
- Repositorio de la Universidad de Cuenca (1)
- Repositório Digital da UNIVERSIDADE DA MADEIRA - Portugal (1)
- Repositório Digital da Universidade Municipal de São Caetano do Sul - USCS (1)
- Repositorio Institucional de la Universidad de Málaga (1)
- Repositorio Institucional de la Universidad Nacional Agraria (1)
- Repositório Institucional UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista "Julio de Mesquita Filho" (29)
- Repositorio Institucional Universidad EAFIT - Medelin - Colombia (1)
- Savoirs UdeS : plateforme de diffusion de la production intellectuelle de l’Université de Sherbrooke - Canada (1)
- School of Medicine, Washington University, United States (1)
- Universidad Autónoma de Nuevo León, Mexico (14)
- Universidad de Alicante (4)
- Universidad del Rosario, Colombia (23)
- Universidad Politécnica de Madrid (20)
- Universidade Complutense de Madrid (7)
- Universidade de Lisboa - Repositório Aberto (1)
- Universidade Federal do Pará (1)
- Universitat de Girona, Spain (2)
- Universitätsbibliothek Kassel, Universität Kassel, Germany (1)
- Université de Lausanne, Switzerland (3)
- Université de Montréal (1)
- Université de Montréal, Canada (7)
- University of Michigan (20)
- University of Queensland eSpace - Australia (22)
- University of Southampton, United Kingdom (2)
- University of Washington (1)
- WestminsterResearch - UK (2)
Resumo:
This study explored the relationship between the practical examination and other course evaluation methods~ specifically, the triple jump, tutorial, and written examination. Studies correlating academic and clinical grades tended to indicate that they may not be highly correlated because each evaluation process contributes different kinds of information regarding student knowledge, skills, and attitudes. Six hypotheses were generated stating a positive relationship between the four evaluation methods. A correlation matrix was produced of the Pearson Product Moment correlation co-efficients on the four evaluation methods in the second and third year Occupational Therapy Technique and Clinical Problem Solving courses of the 1988 and 1989 graduates (n~45). The results showed that the highest correlations existed between the triple jump and the tutorial grades and the lowest correlations existed between the practical examination and written examination grades. Not all of the correlations~ however~ reached levels of significance. The correlations overall. though, were only low to moderate at best which indicates that the evaluation methods may be measuring different aspects of student learning. This conclusion supports the studies researched. The implications and significance of this study is that it will assist the faculty in defining what the various evaluation methods measure which will in turn promote more critical input into curriculum development for the remaining years of the program.