Role and Function of c-Jun Protein Complex in Cancer Cell Behavior

Transcription factors play a crucial role in the regulation of cell behavior by modulating gene expression profiles. Previous studies have described a dual role for the AP-1 family transcription factor c-Jun in the regulation of cellular fate. In various cell types weak and transient activations of c-Jun N-terminal kinase (JNK) and c-Jun appear to contribute to proliferation and survival, whereas strong and prolonged activation of JNK and c-Jun result in apoptosis. These opposite roles played by c-Jun are cell type specific and the molecular mechanisms defining these antonymous c-Jun-mediated responses remain incompletely understood. c-Jun activity in transformed cells is regulated by signalling cascades downstream of oncoproteins such as Ras and Raf. In addition, the pro-proliferative role and the survival promoting function for c-Jun has been described in various cancer models. Furthermore, c-Jun was described to be overexpressed in different cancer types. However, the molecular mechanisms by which c-Jun exerts these oncogenic functions are not all clearly established. Therefore it is of primary interest to further identify molecular mechanisms and functions for c-Jun in cancer. Regulation of gene expression is tightly dependent on accurate protein-protein interactions. Therefore, co-factors for c-Jun may define the functions for c-Jun in cancer. Identification of protein-protein interactions promoting cancer may provide novel possibilities for cancer treatment. In this study, we show that DNA topoisomerase I (TopoI) is a transcriptional co-factor for c-Jun. Moreover, c-Jun and TopoI together promote expression of epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) in cancer cells. We also show that the clinically used TopoI inhibitor topotecan reduces EGFR expression. Importantly, the effect of TopoI on EGFR transcription was shown to depend on c-Jun as Jun-/- cells or cells treated with JNK inhibitor SP600125 are resistant to topotecan treatment both in regulation of EGFR expression and cell proliferation. Moreover, c-Jun regulates the nucleolar localization and the function of the ribonucleic acid (RNA) helicase DDX21, a previously identified member of c-Jun protein complex. In addition, c-Jun stimulates rRNA processing by supporting DDX21 rRNA binding. Finally, this study characterizes a DDX21 dependent expression of cyclin dependent kinase (Cdk) 6, a correlation of DDX21 expression with prostate cancer progression and a substrate binding dependency of DDX21 nucleolar localization in prostate cancer cells. Taken together, the results of this study validate the c-Jun-TopoI interaction and precise the c-Jun-DDX21 interaction. Moreover, these results show the importance for protein-protein interaction in the regulation of their cellular functions in cancer cell behavior. Finally, the results presented here disclose new exciting therapeutic opportunities for cancer treatment.

Functional studies on bacterial nucleotide-regulated inorganic pyrophosphatases

CBS domains are ~60 amino acid tandemly repeated regulatory modules forming a widely distributed domain superfamily. Found in thousands of proteins from all kingdoms of life, CBS domains have adopted a variety of functions during evolution, one of which is regulation of enzyme activity through binding of adenylate-containing compounds in a hydrophobic cavity. Mutations in human CBS domain-containing proteins cause hereditary diseases. Inorganic pyrophosphatases (PPases) are ubiquitous enzymes, which pull pyrophosphate (PPi) producing reactions forward by hydrolyzing PPi into phosphate. Of the two nonhomologous soluble PPases, dimeric family II PPases, belonging to the DHH family of phosphoesterases, require a transition metal and magnesium for maximal activity. A quarter of the almost 500 family II PPases, found in bacteria and archaea, contain a 120-250 amino acid N-terminal insertion, comprised of two CBS domains separated in sequence by a DRTGG domain. These enzymes are thus named CBS-PPases. The function of the DRTGG domain in proteins is unknown. The aim of this PhD thesis was to elucidate the structural and functional differences of CBS-PPases in comparison to family II PPases lacking the regulatory insert. To this end, we expressed, purified and characterized the CBS-PPases from Clostridium perfringens (cpCBS-PPase) and Moorella thermoacetica (mtCBS-PPase), the latter lacking a DRTGG domain. Both enzymes are homodimers in solution and display maximal activity against PPi in the presence of Co2+ and Mg2+. Uniquely, the DRTGG domain was found to enable tripolyphosphate hydrolysis at rates similar to that of PPi. Additionally, we found that AMP and ADP inhibit, while ATP and AP4A activate CBSPPases, thus enabling regulation in response to changes in cellular energy status. We then observed substrate- and nucleotide-induced conformational transitions in mtCBS-PPase and found that the enzyme exists in two differentially active conformations, interconverted through substrate binding and resulting in a 2.5-fold enzyme activation. AMP binding was shown to produce an alternate conformation, which is reached through a different pathway than the substrate-induced conformation. We solved the structure of the regulatory insert from cpCBS-PPase in complex with AMP and AP4A and proposed that conformational changes in the loops connecting the catalytic and regulatory domains enable activity regulation. We examined the effects of mutations in the CBS domains of mtCBS-PPase on catalytic activity, as well as, nucleotide binding and inhibition.

Regulation of HSF2 and its function in mitosis

The cell is continuously subjected to various forms of external and intrinsic proteindamaging stresses, including hyperthermia, pathophysiological states, as well as cell differentiation and proliferation. Proteindamaging stresses result in denaturation and improper folding of proteins, leading to the formation of toxic aggregates that are detrimental for various pathological conditions, including Alzheimer’s and Huntington’s diseases. In order to maintain protein homeostasis, cells have developed different cytoprotective mechanisms, one of which is the evolutionary well-conserved heat shock response. The heat shock response results in the expression of heat shock proteins (Hsps), which act as molecular chaperones that bind to misfolded proteins, facilitate their refolding and prevent the formation of protein aggregates. Stress-induced expression of Hsps is mediated by a family of transcription factors, the heat shock factors, HSFs. Of the four HSFs found in vertebrates, HSF1-4, HSF1 is the major stress-responsive factor that is required for the induction of the heat shock response. HSF2 cannot alone induce Hsps, but modulates the heat shock response by forming heterotrimers with HSF1. HSFs are not only involved in the heat shock response, but they have also been found to have a function in development, neurodegenerative disorders, cancer, and longevity. Therefore, insight into how HSFs are regulated is important for the understanding of both normal physiological and disease processes. The activity of HSF1 is mainly regulated by intricate post-translational modifications, whereas the activity of HSF2 is concentrationdependent. However, there is only limited understanding of how the abundance of HSF2 is regulated. This study describes two different means of how HSF2 levels are regulated. In the first study it was shown that microRNA miR-18, a member of the miR-17~92 cluster, directly regulates Hsf2 mRNA stability and thus protein levels. HSF2 has earlier been shown to play a profound role in the regulation of male germ cell maturation during the spermatogenesis. The effect on miR-18 on HSF2 was examined in vivo by transfecting intact seminiferous tubules, and it was found that inhibition of miR-18 resulted in increased HSF2 levels and modified expression of the HSF2 targets Ssty2 and Speer4a. HSF2 has earlier been reported to modulate the heat shock response by forming heterotrimers with HSF1. In the second study, it was shown that HSF2 is cleared off the Hsp70 promoter and degraded by the ubiquitinproteasome pathway upon acute stress. By silencing components of the anaphase promoting complex/cyclosome (APC/C), including the co-activators Cdc20 and Cdh1, it was shown that APC/C mediates the heatinduced ubiquitylation of HSF2. Furthermore, down-regulation of Cdc20 was shown to alter the expression of heat shock-responsive genes. Next, we studied if APC/C-Cdc20, which controls cell cycle progression, also regulates HSF2 during the cell cycle. We found that both HSF2 mRNA and protein levels decreased during mitosis in several but not all human cell lines, indicating that HSF2 has a function in mitotic cells. Interestingly, although transcription is globally repressed during mitosis, mainly due to the displacement of RNA polymerase II and transcription factors, including HSF1, from the mitotic chromatin, HSF2 is capable of binding DNA during mitosis. Thus, during mitosis the heat shock response is impaired, leaving mitotic cells vulnerable to proteotoxic stress. However, in HSF2-deficient mitotic cells the Hsp70 promoter is accessible to both HSF1 and RNA polymerase II, allowing for stress-inducible Hsp expression to occur. As a consequence HSF2-deficient mitotic cells have a survival advantage upon acute heat stress. The results, presented in this thesis contribute to the understanding of the regulatory mechanisms of HSF2 and its function in the heat shock response in both interphase and mitotic cells.

Regulation of Spermatogenesis: Differentiation of GFP-labeled Stem Cells and the Function of Cytoplasmic Bridges

During spermatogenesis, different genes are expressed in a strictly coordinated fashion providing an excellent model to study cell differentiation. Recent identification of testis specific genes and the development of green fluorescence protein (GFP) transgene technology and an in vivo system for studying the differentiation of transplanted male germ cells in infertile testis has opened new possibilities for studying the male germ cell differentiation at molecular level. We have employed these techniques in combination with transillumination based stage recognition (Parvinen and Vanha-Perttula, 1972) and squash preparation techniques (Parvinen and Hecht, 1981) to study the regulation of male germ cell differentiation. By using transgenic mice expressing enhanced-(E)GFP as a marker we have studied the expression and hormonal regulation of beta-actin and acrosin proteins in the developmentally different living male germ cells. Beta-actin was demonstrated in all male germ cells, whereas acrosin was expressed only in late meiotic and in postmeiotic cells. Follicle stimulating hormone stimulated b-actin-EGFP expression at stages I-VI and enhanced the formation of microtubules in spermatids and this way reduced the size of the acrosomic system. When EGFP expressing spermatogonial stem cells were transplanted into infertile mouse testis differentiation and the synchronized development of male germ cells could be observed during six months observation time. Each colony developed independently and maintained typical stage-dependent cell associations. Furthermore, if more than two colonies were fused, each of them was adjusted to one stage and synchronized. By studying living spermatids we were able to demonstrate novel functions for Golgi complex and chromatoid body in material sharing between neighbor spermatids. Immunosytochemical analyses revealed a transport of haploid cell specific proteins in spermatids (TRA54 and Shippo1) and through the intercellular bridges (TRA54). Cytoskeleton inhibitor (nocodazole) demonstrated the importance of microtubules in material sharing between spermatids and in preserving the integrity of the chromatoid body. Golgi complex inhibitor, brefeldin A, revealed the great importance of Golgi complex i) in acrosomic system formation ii) TRA54 translation and in iii) granule trafficking between spermatids.