Molecular Systematics of Noctuoidea (Insecta, lepidoptera)

In this thesis, I conduct a series of molecular systematic studies on the large phytophagous moth superfamily Noctuoidea (Insecta, Lepidoptera) to clarify deep divergences and evolutionary affinities of the group, based on material from every zoogeographic region of the globe. Noctuoidea are the most speciose radiations of butterflies and moths on earth, comprising about a quarter of all lepidopteran diversity. The general aim of these studies was to apply suitably conservative genetic markers (DNA sequences of mitochondrial—mtDNA—and nuclear gene— nDNA—regions) to reconstruct, as the initial step, a robust skeleton phylogenetic hypothesis for the superfamily, then build up robust phylogenetic frameworks for those circumscribed monophyletic entities (i.e., families), as well as clarifying the internal classification of monophyletic lineages (subfamilies and tribes), to develop an understanding of the major lineages at various taxonomic levels within the superfamily Noctuoidea, and their inter-relationships. The approaches applied included: i) stabilizing a robust family-level classification for the superfamily; ii) resolving the phylogeny of the most speciose radiation of Noctuoidea: the family Erebidae; iii) reconstruction of ancestral feeding behaviors and evolution of the vampire moths (Erebidae, Calpinae); iv) elucidating the evolutionary relationships within the family Nolidae and v) clarifying the basal lineages of Noctuidae sensu stricto. Thus, in this thesis I present a wellresolved molecular phylogenetic hypothesis for higher taxa of Noctuoidea consisting of six strongly supported families: Oenosandridae, Notodontidae, Euteliidae, Erebidae, Nolidae, and Noctuidae. The studies in my thesis highlight the importance of molecular data in systematic and phylogenetic studies, in particular DNA sequences of nuclear genes, and an extensive sampling strategy to include representatives of all known major lineages of entire world fauna of Noctuoidea from every biogeographic region. This is crucial, especially when the model organism is as species-rich, highly diverse, cosmopolitan and heterogeneous as the Noctuoidea, traits that represent obstacles to the use of morphology at this taxonomic level.

Adaptive Dynamics of Resource Specialization

Ecological specialization in resource utilization has various facades ranging from nutritional resources via host use of parasites or phytophagous insects to local adaptation in different habitats. Therefore, the evolution of specialization affects the evolution of most other traits, which makes it one of the core issues in the theory of evolution. Hence, the evolution of specialization has gained enormous amounts of research interest, starting already from Darwin’s Origin of species in 1859. Vast majority of the theoretical studies has, however, focused on the mathematically most simple case with well-mixed populations and equilibrium dynamics. This thesis explores the possibilities to extend the evolutionary analysis of resource usage to spatially heterogeneous metapopulation models and to models with non-equilibrium dynamics. These extensions are enabled by the recent advances in the field of adaptive dynamics, which allows for a mechanistic derivation of the invasion-fitness function based on the ecological dynamics. In the evolutionary analyses, special focus is set to the case with two substitutable renewable resources. In this case, the most striking questions are, whether a generalist species is able to coexist with the two specialist species, and can such trimorphic coexistence be attained through natural selection starting from a monomorphic population. This is shown possible both due to spatial heterogeneity and due to non-equilibrium dynamics. In addition, it is shown that chaotic dynamics may sometimes inflict evolutionary suicide or cyclic evolutionary dynamics. Moreover, the relations between various ecological parameters and evolutionary dynamics are investigated. Especially, the relation between specialization and dispersal propensity turns out to be counter-intuitively non-monotonous. This observation served as inspiration to the analysis of joint evolution of dispersal and specialization, which may provide the most natural explanation to the observed coexistence of specialist and generalist species.