Nanoclustering augmentation : a novel mechanism of Ras activation in cancer

Proteins of the Ras family are central regulators of crucial cellular processes, such as proliferation, differentiation and apoptosis. Their importance is emphasized in cancer, in which the isoforms H-ras, N-ras and K-ras are misregulated by mutations in approximately 20 – 30 % of cases. Thus, they represent major cancer oncogenes and one of the most important targets for cancer drug development. Ras proteins are small GTPases, which cycle between the GTP-bound active and GDP-bound inactive state. Despite the tremendous research conducted in the last three decades, many fundamental properties of Ras proteins remain poorly understood. For instance, although new concepts have recently emerged, the understanding of Ras behavior in its native environment, the membrane, is still largely missing. On the membrane Ras organizes into nanoscale clusters, also called nanoclusters. They differ between isoforms, but also between activation states of Ras. It is considered that nanoclusters represent the basic Ras signaling units. Recently, it was demonstrated that on the membrane Ras adopts distinct conformations, the so-called orientations, which are dependent on the Ras activations state. The membrane-orientation of H-ras is stabilized by the helix α4 and the C-terminal hypervariable region (hvr). The novel switch III region was proposed to be involved in mediating the change between different H-ras orientations. When the regions involved in this mechanism are mutated, H-ras activity is changed by an unknown mechanism. This thesis has explained the connection between the change of Ras orientation on the membrane and Ras activity. We demonstrated that H-ras orientation mutants exhibit altered diffusion properties on the membrane, which reflect the changes in their nanoclustering. The altered nanoclustering consequently rules the activity of the mutants. Moreover, we demonstrated that specific cancer-related mutations, affecting the switch III region of different Ras isoforms, exhibit increased nanoclustering, which consequently leads to stronger Ras signaling and tumorigenicity. Thus, we have discovered nanoclustering increase as a novel mechanism of Ras activity modulation in cancer. The molecular architecture of complexes formed on the membrane upon Ras activation is another poorly understood property of Ras. The following work has provided novel details on the regulation of Ras nanoclustering by a known H-ras-GTP nanoclustering stabilizer galectin-1 (Gal-1). Our study demonstrated that Gal-1 is not able to bind Ras directly, as it was previously proposed. Instead, its effect on H-ras-GTP nanoclustering is indirect, through binding of the effector proteins. Collectively, our findings represent valuable novel insights in the behavior of Ras, which will help the future research to eventually develop new strategies to successfully target Ras in cancer.

Photoinhibition of Photosystem II. Kinetics, Photoprotection and Mechanism

Photosystem II (PSII) is susceptible to light-induced damage defined as photoinhibition. In natural conditions, plants are capable of repairing the photoinhibited PSII by on-going degradation and re-synthesis of the D1 reaction centre protein of PSII. Photoinhibition is induced by both visible and ultraviolet light and photoinhibition occurs under all light intensities with the same efficiency per photon. In my thesis work, I studied the reaction kinetics and mechanism of photoinhibition of PSII, as well as photoprotection in leaves of higher plants. Action spectroscopy was used to identify photoreceptors of photoinhibition. I found that the action spectrum of photoinhibition in vivo shows resemblance to the absorption spectra of manganese model compounds of the oxygen evolving complex (OEC) suggesting a role for manganese as a photoreceptor of photoinhibition under UV and visible light. In order to study the protective effect of non-photochemical quenching, the action spectrum was measured from leaves of wild type Arabidopsis thaliana and two mutants impaired in nonphotochemical quenching of chlorophyll a excitations. The findings of action spectroscopy and simulations of chlorophyll-based photoinhibition mechanisms suggested that quenching of antenna excitations protects less efficiently than would be expected if antenna chlorophylls were the only photoreceptors of photoinhibition. The reaction kinetics of prolonged photoinhibition was studied in leaves of Cucurbita maxima and Capsicum annuum. The results indicated that photoinhibitory decrease in both the oxygen evolution activity and ratio of variable to maximum fluorescence follows firstorder kinetics in vivo. The persistence of first-order kinetics suggests that already photoinhibited reaction centres do not protect against photoinhibition and that the mechanism of photoinhibition does not have a reversible intermediate. When Cucurbita maxima leaves were photoinhibited with saturating single-turnover flashes and continuous light, the light response curve of photoinhibition was found to be essentially a straight line with both types of illumination, suggesting that similar photoinhibition mechanisms might function during illumination with continuous light and during illumination with short flashes.