Innovation management of biorefineries in Finnish forest sector

The aim of this report is to give a comprehensive overview of the opportunities integrated biorefining can offer to Finnish forest industry companies and to assess what changes it would require from these companies to implement biorefining into their business. Also the strengths and weaknesses of the Finnish forest industry companies connected to biorefining are examined through innovation management theory frames, industry comparisons, company examples and couple of case-examples. The conclusions of the report include the statement that the Finnish forest industry has a good starting point for biorefinering and many advantages compared to other countries and industries. Unfortunately the history of the industry is holding it back and the thinking patterns would have to be altered to a more innovative and co-operational direction.

Suomen ekologinen jalanjälki - metsäosion laskenta

Tämä teksti on työselostus indeksin ekologinen jalanjälki metsäosion laskennan menetelmiä selvittävästä tutkimuksesta. Tutkimusraportti alkaa selostuksella, jossa kerrotaanaiheen taustaa ja yhteys, missä liikutaan: indikaattorien hyödyntäminen, politiikka kestävän kehityksen ympärillä sekä hieman kestävän kehityksen kokonaisuudesta. Tämä on johdanto varsinaiseen tutkimuksen sisältöön. Tekstissä raportoidaan ekologisen jalanjäljen vuoden 2001 laskentataulukon mukainen metsäosion laskentamenetelmä sekä myös hiilidioksidin sitoutumisen jalanjäljen ja biokapasiteetin laskentamenetelmät. Tutkimuksen tuloksia ovat laskennasta löytyneet epäkohdat ja niiden kehittäminen. Tekstissä koetetaan myös selventää ekologisen jalanjäljen kokonaisuutta ja sitä miten sen tuloksia tulisi lukea.

Luoteis-Venäjän metsävaratja niiden hyödyntämismahdollisuudet

Tuontipuulla onsuuri merkitys suomalaiselle metsäteollisuudelle. Tämän tutkimuksen tavoitteitaovat Suomen metsäteollisuuden puuntuonnin tärkeimmän alueen, Luoteis-Venäjän metsävarojen kartoittaminen ja niiden hyödyntämismahdollisuuksien arviointi. Työssä käsitellään myös lyhyesti suoria ulkomaisia investointeja Luoteis-Venäjän metsäsektorille. Luoteis-Venäjällä on suuremmat metsävarat kuin muulla Euroopalla yhteensä. Koko maailmassa on vain 5 valtiota, jolla olisi suuremmat metsävarat kuin sillä. Eniten metsiä Luoteis-Venäjällä on Komin tasavallassa ja Arkangelin alueella. Kuusi ja mänty ovat yleisimmät puulajit. Hyvien iikenneyhteyksien varsilta metsät on hakattu ja jätetty uudistamatta, minkä seurauksena koivu ja haapa ovat vallanneet alaa havupuilta. Niinpä alueen metsäteollisuus, etenkin sahateollisuus kärsii puupulasta. Suomen metsäteollisuus on sen sijaan hyötynyt siitä, että koivukuitupuuta on runsaasti saatavilla. Metsävarojen hyödyntämisen suurimmatesteet ovat harva ja huonokuntoinen metsätieverkosto sekä metsien riittämätön hoito. Venäläisestä näkökulmasta alueen metsävarat ovat vajaakäytössä: vuotuiset hakkuut ovat alle puolet kasvusta, suuri osa puusta viedään raakapuuna ulkomaille, ja alueen metsäteollisuuden tuotteiden jalostusarvo jää alhaiseksi. Suoria ulkomaisia investointeja Luoteis-Venäjän metsäsektorille houkuttelevat suuret puuvarat, halpa energia ja tulevaisuudessa etenkin kasvavat markkinat. Investointejahaittaavat huono infrastruktuuri, korruptio ja epävarmuus maan kehityksestä.

Luoteis-Venäjän metsävaratja niiden hyödyntämismahdollisuudet

Suomen metsäteollisuuden käyttämästä puusta neljännes on tuontipuuta, josta Venäjän tuonnin osuus on hyvin merkittävä. Suomen metsäteollisuus on riippuvainen etenkin Luoteis-Venäjän metsien puusta. Venäjä pyrkii nostamaan metsäteollisuuden jalostusastetta ja hyödyntämään voimallisemmin omia metsävaroja, mikä merkitsee suuria haasteita suomalaiselle metsäteollisuudelle ja sen raaka-ainehuollolle. Tässä raportissa tarkastellaan Luoteis-Venäjän metsävaroja, metsänkäyttöä ja sen ongelmia sekä metsien hallinnointia. Lisäksi käsitellään Luoteis-Venäjän metsäsektoria ja siihen tehtyjä suoria ulkomaisia investointeja. Lopuksi kuvataan Luoteis-Venäjän kuljetusinfrastruktuuria sekä arvioidaan Luoteis-Venäjän metsävarojen käytön potentiaalia.

Research of wood fuel market in North-West of Russia

The main purposes of this study are analyzing of forest sector of North-West and research of potentials of wood fuel market in this region. Research is focused on definition of the most perspective areas for export of wood fuel: logging residues, industrial wood processing residues, pellets and briquettes. Russian wood energy industry is very young in comparison with European countries. Nowadays there are no support and serious attention from the government to this sector. Hence almost all wood fuel market is oriented to the Western Europe. Export of wood fuel is dominated over the internal consumption. Pellet production in North –West is rapidly growing. Despite internal market has been developed the lion's share of pellets goes to export. Part of industrial wood processing residues is used by producers for their own goals, part goes to the export and rest of them is not used at all. Logging residues as raw materials for fuel have great potentials; most of them are left in a forest. Special techniques for their processing are too expensive for Russian entrepreneur. Some parts of North –West, which are situated close to the border with European countries, are potential for export. Political, economical and logistical challenges are complicated facilities for foreign customer to purchase wood fuel in remote parts of North-West. However some decisions for solving this problem exist and Russian manufactures are still interested in export of their products.

Metsäsääntely Suomessa ja Venäjällä. Näkökulmia kestävään metsätalouteen

Sustainability is the aim of forest management and forest regulation in many countries. Accordingly, forest management has been steered towards more environmentally friendly methods and new regulatory instruments have been introduced. At the same time, wood trade and forest industry have become a global business. Even if the importance of national forest legislation has not decreased, it has been widely acknowledged that national regulation of forest management is no longer sufficient. The movement of goods does not acknowledge boundaries, even though most negative environmental and social consequences stay in the country of origin of wood and other raw materials. As a partial solution to this dilemma, different kinds of regulations have been developed. Various forest certification schemes and wood trade regulation in the EU (995/2010) are examples of efforts to prevent illegal logging and unsustainable forestry. The Finland-based forest industry is to a varying extent dependent on wood trade from Russia. Especially in the 1990‟s, ethical questions concerning import of wood from Russian old growth forests near the Finnish border were widely discussed. Consequently, forest industry enterprises have developed systems to trace the origin of wood and to buy certified wood from Russia. The aim of the research has been to evaluate Finnish and Russian forest regulations in order to investigate what kind of forest management these regulations enhance, and to what extent ecologically sustainable forest management has been integrated into different forms of regulation. I have examined Finnish and Russian forest regulation in four separate articles based on the topics of the Russian Forest Code, forest certification and other voluntary forest protection measures in Russia, Finnish forest certification and Finnish forest legislation. One objective has been to analyse the roles voluntary forest certification plays in promoting sustainable forest management in different countries. In my research, I have mainly concentrated on ecological sustainability and protection of biodiversity, although other aspects of sustainable forest management have been touched upon in different articles. In the following I shall conclude the findings of my research. When the current Russian Forest Code (2006) was being adopted, the main emphasis was not on ecological issues, but on reorganizing forest governance. The role of ecological requirements was even slightly diminished during the legislative reform. There are, nevertheless, still stipulations aiming at ecological sustainability, such as the division of forests into different forest management categories and various protection zones. In 2000, FSC forest certification arrived in Russia, at present covering already 28 million hectares of forests. The PEFC scheme is now in use as well, but to a much lesser extent. If properly implemented, Russian forest certification schemes clearly improve the level of ecological and social sustainability of forestry in Russia. Certification criteria, however, are partly in conflict with the Russian forest legislation and certified enterprises have been forced to pay fines or to negotiate with forest authorities. This clearly indicates that even if Russian forest legislation has otherwise been liberalized to a certain extent, some significant paternalism still exists. Voluntary, hands-on biodiversity protection measures are not valued, and they are not part of the official protection policies as in many other countries. However, there have been some regional solutions to this dilemma. In the Republic of Karelia forest authorities have approved a set of forest biodiversity protection rules created by a local NGO and a forest industry enterprise. By following these local rules, an enterprise can avoid fines for protection measures. The current Finnish Forest Act was adopted in 1996. It brought forest legislation into a new era as some ecological aspects were integrated into forest legislation. The various soft-law forest management recommendations further increased the level of biodiversity protection. My evaluation of the overall legitimacy of the Finnish forest legislation and forest management paradigm revealed, however, several problematic issues. As part of this study I analysed the history of the current forest management paradigm. This analysis revealed the path dependency which still hinders the protection of biodiversity and clearly decreases the general legitimacy of forest management. Due to several historical reasons only even-structured forest management based on clear cuts has for decades been officially approved in Finland. Due to increasing demands of forest owners the legislation is finally being revised. Yet, the official approval of uneven-structured forest management would not be enough to fully improve ecological, social and cultural legitimacy. The latest ecological theories and knowledge of endangered species should be taken into account in the on-going reform of forest legislation as well as the modernisation. Forest legislation is one of the very few spheres of Finnish environmental legislation where openness and participation are still considered a threat. The first Finnish forest certification scheme, PEFC, was established in 2000. It now covers more than 20 million hectares, about 95% of the forests in Finland. PEFC Finland does not require a higher level of biodiversity protection than the recommendations by Tapio (the Development Centre for Forestry), but certification has unified forest management practices and requires more protection measures than mere forest legislation. The study suggests that in Finland PEFC has not functioned as an instrument which would substantially improve the level of forest management. Rather it has supported the status quo of the forest sector. While the ecological and social responsibility of Finland-based forest corporations was one impetus for this research, I want to conclude that there are problems related to forest legislation and non-state regulation in both Finland and Russia. If an enterprise buying wood from Russia buys only certified wood, and carefully avoids wood coming from high conservation value forests that are either ecologically or socially valuable, it can be claimed to be as sustainably produced as in Finland. However, there must be continuous scrutiny of the circumstances. In Russia, the level of the compliance of certification criteria varies considerably, and there are vast unprotected invaluable forest areas. The utilisation of these areas should not be based on short-sighted decisions or lack of consensus among stakeholders.

Talouskriisin vaikutus suomalaisten metsäteollisuusyritysten kannattavuuteen ja vakavaraisuuteen

Tässä kandidaatintyössä tutkitaan, kuinka vuonna 2008 alkanut maailmanlaajuinen talouskriisi on vaikuttanut suomalaisten metsäteollisuusyhtiöiden kannattavuuteen ja vakavaraisuuteen ja näiden valossa pohtia suomalaisen metsäteollisuuden tulevaisuudennäkymiä, mahdollisuuksia ja uhkia.

Models in country scale carbon accounting of forest soils

Selective papers of the workshop on "Development of models and forest soil surveys for monitoring of soil carbon", Koli, Finland, April 5-9 2006.