32 resultados para fish density

em Doria (National Library of Finland DSpace Services) - National Library of Finland, Finland


Relevância:

20.00% 20.00%

Publicador:

Resumo:

B-ryhmän beetahemolyyttinen streptokokki (GBS = Group B Streptococcus, Streptococcus agalactiae)aiheuttaa vakavia infektioita yleensä astasyntyneillä. Tartunta saadaan yleensä synnytyskanavasta ja riskitekijöinä ovat muun muassa keskosuus, ennenaikainen lapsivedenmeno ja äidin runsas Bstreptokokkikolonisaatio emättimessä. Bakteerin tunnistukseen käytetään tällä hetkellä viljelytekniikkaa, jonka tulos saadaan vasta 24-48 tunnin kuluttua. Opinnäytetyöni tarkoituksena on tutkia uutta ja nopeampaa tunnistusmenetelmää: GBS PNA FISH - tekniikkaa (Peptide Nucleic Acid Fluorescence in Situ Hybridization). Tarkoituksena on tutkia tekniikan spesifiteettiä ja sensitiviteettiä. Tekniikan spesifiteettiä tutkitaan B-ryhmän beetahemolyyttisellä streptokokilla sekä kuudella muulla emättimen normaaliflooraan kuuluvalla bakteerilajilla. Yhteensä bakteerikantoja on tutkimuksessa mukana 48 kappaletta. Tämän lisäksi tutkitaan myös tekniikan sensitiviteettiä, jota tutkitaan bakteereista tehdyn laimennossarjan avulla. Sensitiviteetti tutkitaan bakteeriseoksesta, jonne on B-ryhmän beetahemolyyttisen streptokokin lisäksi lisätty muita emättimen normaaliflooran bakteereita. Lisäksi sensitiviteetti tutkitaan pelkällä B-ryhmän beetahemolyyttisellä streptokokilla käyttäen sekä normaalia että bakteerin rikastusmenetelmää. Testeistä saadut tulokset tulkitaan fluoresenssimikroskoopin avulla. GBS PNA FISH -tekniikan spesifiteetti todettiin erittäin hyväksi. Tekniikka tunnisti kaikki B-ryhmän beetahemolyyttiset streptokokit positiivisiksi ja kaikki muut lajit antoivat negatiivisen tuloksen. B-streptokokin positiivisuus oli erotettavissa mikroskopoitaessa vahvana fluoresointina, kun taas muut lajit eivät fluoresoineet lainkaan. GBS PNA FISH -tekniikan sensitiivisyyden tulokset eivät kuitenkaan täyttäneet odotuksia. Ainoastaan bakteerin rikastusmenetelmällä saadut tulokset olivat loistavia, mutta bakteeriseoksella ja pelkällä B-ryhmän beetahemolyyttisellä streptokokilla saadut tulokset olivat lähes olemattomia. Rikastusmenetelmän kaikki laimennokset fluoresoivat positiivisina, kun taas muissa tapauksissa vain vahvin liuos antoi jonkinlaista positiivista fluoresointia. GBS PNA FISH -tekniikan spesifiteetti todettiin hyväksi. Tekniikan sensitiviteetti ei kuitenkaan vastaa käyttötarkoitusta ja todellisessa tilanteessa tekniikka ei pystyisi tunnistamaan sille spesifistä bakteeria muiden bakteerien joukosta.

Relevância:

20.00% 20.00%

Publicador:

Relevância:

20.00% 20.00%

Publicador:

Relevância:

20.00% 20.00%

Publicador:

Resumo:

[Abstract]

Relevância:

20.00% 20.00%

Publicador:

Resumo:

The objective of my thesis is to assess mechanisms of ecological community control in macroalgal communities in the Baltic Sea. In the top-down model, predatory fish feed on invertebrate mesograzers, releasing algae partly from grazing pressure. Such a reciprocal relationship is called trophic cascade. In the bottom-up model, nutrients increase biomass in the food chain. The nutrients are first assimilated by algae and, via food chain, increase also abundance of grazers and predators. Previous studies on oceanic shores have described these two regulative mechanisms in the grazer - alga link, but how they interact in the trophic cascades from fish to algae is still inadequately known. Because the top-down and bottom-up mechanisms are predicted to depend on environmental disturbances, such as wave stress and light, I have studied these models at two distinct water depths. There are five factorial field experiments behind the thesis, which were all conducted in the Finnish Archipelago Sea. In all the experiments, I studied macroalgal colonization - either density, filament length or biomass - on submerged colonization substrates. By excluding predatory fish and mesograzers from the algal communities, the studies compared the strength of the top-down control to natural algal communities. A part of the experimental units were, in addition, exposed to enriched nitrogen and phosphorus concentrations, which enabled testing of bottom-up control. These two models of community control were further investigated in shallow (<1 m) and deep (ca. 3 m) water. Moreover, the control mechanisms were also expected to depend on grazer species. Therefore different grazer species were enclosed into experimental units and their impacts on macroalgal communities were followed specifically. The community control in the Baltic rocky shores was found to follow theoretical predictions, which have not been confirmed by field studies before. Predatory fish limited grazing impact, which was seen as denser algal communities and longer algal filaments. Nutrient enrichment increased density and filament length of annual algae and, thus, changed the species composition of the algal community. The perennial alga Fucus vesiculosusA and the red alga Ceramium tenuicorne suffered from the increased nutrient availabilities. The enriched nutrient conditions led to denser grazer fauna, thereby causing strong top-down control over both the annual and perennial macroalgae. The strength of the top-down control seemed to depend on the density and diversity of grazers and predators as well as on the species composition of macroalgal assemblages. The nutrient enrichment led to, however, weaker limiting impact of predatory fish on grazer fauna, because fish stocks did not respond as quickly to enhanced resources in the environment as the invertebrate fauna. According to environmental stress model, environmental disturbances weaken the top-down control. For example, on a wave-exposed shore, wave stress causes more stress to animals close to the surface than deeper on the shore. Mesograzers were efficient consumers at both the depths, while predation by fish was weaker in shallow water. Thus, the results supported the environmental stress model, which predicts that environmental disturbance affects stronger the higher a species is in the food chain. This thesis assessed the mechanisms of community control in three-level food chains and did not take into account higher predators. Such predators in the Baltic Sea are, for example, cormorant, seals, white-tailed sea eagle, cod and salmon. All these predatory species were recently or are currently under intensive fishing, hunting and persecution, and their stocks have only recently increased in the region. Therefore, it is possible that future densities of top predators may yet alter the strengths of the controlling mechanisms in the Baltic littoral zone.