4 resultados para appropriability
em Doria (National Library of Finland DSpace Services) - National Library of Finland, Finland
Resumo:
Building and sustaining competitive advantage through the creation of market imperfections is challenging in a constantly changing business environment - particularly since the sources of such advantages are increasingly knowledge-based. Facilitated by improved networks and communication, knowledge spills over to competitors more easily than before,thus creating an appropriability problem: the inability of an innovating firm to utilize its innovations commercially. Consequently, as the importance of intellectual assets increases, their protection also calls for new approaches. Companies have various means of protection at their disposal, and by taking advantage of them they can make intangibles more non-transferable and prevent, or at leastdelay, imitation of their most crucial intellectual assets. However, creating barriers against imitation has another side to it, and the transfer of knowledge in situations requiring knowledge sharing may be unintentionally obstructed. Theaim of this thesis is to increase understanding of how firms can balance knowledge protection and sharing so as to benefit most from their knowledge assets. Thus, knowledge protection is approached through an examination of the appropriability regime of a firm, i.e., the combination of available and effective means ofprotecting innovations, their profitability, and the increased rents due to R&D. A further aim is to provide a broader understanding of the formation and structure of the appropriability regime. The study consists of two parts. The first part introduces the research topic and the overall results of the study, and the second part consists of six complementary research publications covering various appropriability issues. The thesis contributes to the existing literature in several ways. Although there is a wide range of prior research on appropriability issues, a lot of it is restricted either to the study of individual appropriability mechanisms, or to comparing certain features of them. These approaches are combined, and the relevant theoretical concepts are clarified and developed. In addition, the thesis provides empirical evidence of the formation of the appropriability regime, which is consequently presented as an adaptive process. Thus, a framework is provided that better corresponds to the complex reality of the current business environment.
Resumo:
The main aim of this thesis was to find out what kinds of risks arise from collabo-ration in R&D between small and large firms. The suitability and gain of some buyer/supplier risk frameworks in examining of R&D collaboration has been in-vestigated. A risk model has been based on the buyer/supplier risks models found in the literature. Its applicability has been tested empirically by means of theme interviews with firm representatives. The risk classification framework received some confirmation. But the study also showed that the theoretical framework was not completely adequate, as a new risk class arose from communication. Collaboration causes risks, and these risks should be taken into account when R&D collaboration is planned. The advantage of risk examination is the possibility to decrease failures and losses, and to in-crease possibilities for success and economical benefits. This study should be used as a managerial analysis tool in trying to understand the form and concept of risk in risk expectancy.
Resumo:
The most important knowledge in firms is mostly tacit and embedded in individuals within the organization. This background knowledge that firms possess is used for creation of new knowledge and innovations. As firms today greatly concentrate on their core competencies, they need external knowledge from various collaboration partners. Thus, collaborative relationship governance, as well as control (use of appropriability mechanisms) over background (the input from each firm in innovative activities) and foreground knowledge (the output of collaboration activities) is needed in order to successfully create and capture value from innovative activities without losing core knowledge and competitiveness. Even though research has concentrated on knowledge protection and knowledge sharing, studies that combine both of these views and examine the effects of sharing and protection on value creation and capture have been rather limited. Studies have mainly focused on the protection of the output of innovation while forgetting the protection of the input of innovation. On the other hand, as the research concentrating on the output of innovation tends to favor formal mechanisms, informal mechanisms have remained more unknown to researchers as well as managers. This research aims to combine the perspectives of knowledge sharing and knowledge protection and their relationship with value creation and value capture. The sharing and protection are viewed from two points of view: the use of appropriability mechanisms, as well as governance of the collaborative relationship. The study consists of two parts. The first part introduces the research topic and discusses the overall results. The second part comprises six complementary research publications. Both qualitative and quantitative research methods are used in the study. In terms of results, the findings enhance understanding of the combined use of formal and informal mechanisms for knowledge protection and sharing. Informal mechanisms appear to be emphasized in the protection of background knowledge, and thus are prerequisites for innovation, whereas formal mechanisms are relied on more for protecting the results of innovative activities. However, the simultaneous use of the formal and informal mechanisms that are relevant to the particular industry and innovation context is recommendedthroughout the collaborative innovation process. Further, the study adds to the current knowledge on HRM as an appropriability mechanism: on the firm level its uses include assessing and hedging against employee-related risks such as knowledge leaking and knowledge leaving. A further contribution is to the research on HRM protection and its interrelations with other appropriability mechanisms, its constituents, and its potential use in the area of knowledge protection.
Resumo:
Tässä tutkielmassa perehdyttiin julkisen tutkimuksen kaupallistamiseen tutkimusorganisaatio VTT:n tapauksen kautta. Tutkimuksen tavoitteena oli selvittää, kuinka julkista tutkimusta voidaan yleensä kaupallistaa, mitkä ovat kaupallistamisprosessin vaiheet, haasteet sekä kriittiset onnistumistekijät. Tutkimus on luonteeltaan laadullinen ja se toteutettiin henkilöhaastatteluina, joita täydennettiin kirjallisilla lähteillä. Tutkimuksessa ilmeni, että VTT:llä julkisrahoitteisen tutkimuksen tuloksia kaupallistetaan lisensoimalla, toimeksianto- eli sopimustutkimuksen kautta, spin-off toimilla, allianssien ja erilaisten palvelujen, kuten valmistus-, testaus-, ja analyysipalvelujen kautta. VTT:n näkökulmasta katsottuna merkittävin kaupallistamiskanava on sopimus- eli toimeksiantotutkimus, jota seuraavat lisensointi sekä spin-off toiminta. Kaupallistamistavan valinta riippuu lukuisista tekijöistä, kuten organisaation kaupallistamisstrategiasta, innovaatiotyypistä, teknologian kypsyydestä, tiedon luonteesta, toimialojen ja markkinoiden ominaisuuksista, innovaation hyödynnettävyydestä ja suojauksesta, arvonmuodostuspotentiaalista kuin yksittäisten henkilöiden motivaatiostakin.Valinta onkin tehtävä tapauskohtaisesti. Julkisesta tutkimuksesta lähtöisin olevien teknologioiden tie markkinoille voi olla haastava, sillä teknologiat ovat kehitetty ei-kaupallisessa ympäristössä. Tutkimuksessa kävi ilmi, että kriittisimmiksi koetut kaupallistamisen onnistumistekijät liittyivät organisaatioon, teknologiaan, markkina- ja asiakastarpeeseen, aineettoman omaisuuden suojaukseen sekä markkinoille menon nopeuteen.