6 resultados para TREATMENT TRIAL
em Doria (National Library of Finland DSpace Services) - National Library of Finland, Finland
Resumo:
The UPM-Kymmene Oyj Pietarsaari pulp and paper Mill biological wastewater treatment plant was built in the 1980's and the plant has been in use ever since. During the past years there have been problems with deviations. The wastewater treatment plant needs update, especially the aeration basin, where the old surface aerators cannot produce enough mixing and indroduce oxygen enough to the wastewater. In this thesis how extra aeration with oxygen affects the wastewater treatment plant effluent was studied. In the literature part the main focus is in aeration devices, which can be used in biological wastewater treatment. The target is to compare different kind of aerators, which are suitable for pulp and paper wastewater treatment. Studies show, that EDI-aerators are commonly used and also most suitable. In the experimental part, the focus is on the Pietarsaari Mills wastewater treatment plant and oxygen aeration during autumn 2008. This thesis presents the results of the trial run. Studies show, that extra oxygen devices can produce lot a of mixing and the oxygenation capacity was more than what the micro-organisms needed. The effect on sludge quality could not been seen during the trial runs.
Resumo:
The aim of this thesis was to evaluate the short- and long-term effectiveness of a prefabricated occlusal appliance (R) on patients with myofascial pain and headache by comparing it with the treatment of the stabilization appliance (S). Another aim was to evaluate the effect of appliance treatment on stress-related salivary parameters like cortisol and IgA, as well as on flow rate values in these patients. Sixty-five patients diagnosed with myofascial temporomandibular disorder (TMD) pain, of whom 94% suffered concomitantly from headache, at two centres for Stomatognathic Physiology, one in Sweden and one in Finland, were included in this randomized controlled trial using Research Diagnostic Criteria for TMD (RDC/TMD), with history questionnaires and clinical examinations performed at baseline and at 6- and 10-weeks, and 6- and 12-month follow-ups. Patients were randomly assigned either to the R or the S group. Treatment outcome was measured according to IMMPACT (Initiative on Methods, Measurements, and Pain Assessment in Clinical Trials), i.e. four chronic pain outcome domains: pain intensity, overall improvement, physical and emotional functioning. Changes in frequency and intensity of headache were recorded. Thirty-nine patients participated in the saliva study. Salivary analyses were performed at 6 and 10 weeks. The results revealed no differences between groups at baseline. At all follow-ups, all four outcome measures, as well as frequency and intensity of headache, showed statistically significant within-group improvement compared to baseline, without significant differences between groups. No treatment-induced changes in saliva parameters could be registered. In conclusion, the effectiveness of the prefabricated appliance seemed to be similar to that of the stabilization appliance in alleviating myofascial pain, and frequency and intensity of headache, in the short as well as the long term. However, no changes in salivary parameters were observed during treatment.
Resumo:
Background: The burden of influenza on children is substantial. Although mortality rates are low, the incidence of influenza is highest in children, among whom also complications are frequent. A more accurate recognition of influenza in children could enable the rational use of antiviral drugs and help to avoid unnecessary courses of antibiotics. Limited data exists on the efficacy of oseltamivir treatment and the trivalent inactivated influenza vaccine (TIV) in children. Aims and methods: We sought for signs and symptoms that could help clinicians to diagnose influenza on clinical grounds in a case-control study in children <13 years of age. We further assessed the feasibility of different diagnostics methods during the early stage of the illness in children aged 1-3 years. The efficacy of early oseltamivir treatment (started <24h from the onset of symptoms) was evaluated in a randomized controlled trial (RCT) conducted in children 1-3 years of age, and the effectiveness of TIV to prevent laboratory-confirmed influenza was determined in a prospective, observational cohort study conducted among children aged 9 months to 3 years of age. Results: Fever was the only symptom predicting influenza in children. The sensitivity of conventionally used laboratory methods to detect influenza during the first 24h of illness was 92%. The sensitivity of the influenza rapid test in the same setting was 90% for influenza A and 25% for influenza B. Early oseltamivir treatment shortened the duration of the illness in children with influenza A by 3.5-4.0 days, but no efficacy was observed against influenza B. The effectiveness of TIV was 84% against the wellmatched influenza A, while no effectiveness against the mismatched influenza B was observed. Conclusions: Laboratory diagnostics are needed for a reliable diagnosis of influenza in children and were found sensitive already during the early stage of the illness. Early oseltamivir treatment was highly effective against influenza A, but no efficacy was seen against influenza B. TIV is effective also in young children if a good match between the vaccine and circulating strain is achieved.
Resumo:
Background: Acute otitis media (AOM) is the most common bacterial infection in young children, but the optimal management of AOM remains controversial. The aim of this study was to assess the efficacy of antimicrobial treatment, either immediate or delayed, for AOM and to compare parental experiences regarding the management of AOM in two countries with very different treatment guidelines. Methods: Altogether, 322 children participated in a randomized, double-blind, placebocontrolled trial. Children 6–35 months of age with AOM received amoxicillin-clavulanate or placebo for 7 days. The primary outcome was the time to treatment failure. In the second study, the delayed antimicrobial treatment group consisted of recipients of placebo who had received rescue treatment. The immediate antimicrobial treatment group consisted of children allocated to amoxicillin-clavulanate group. Parental expectations and opinions were evaluated by questionnaires sent via public day care in Turku, Finland, and Utrecht, the Netherlands. Results: Treatment failure occurred significantly more often in children receiving placebo as compared to antimicrobial treatment (45% vs. 19%, P<0.001). Delayed initiation of antimicrobial treatment did not worsen the recovery from AOM, but it was associated with worsening of the child’s condition, prolongation of symptoms, and absenteeism from day care and parental absenteeism from work. According to the comparative questionnaire, antimicrobial use was more common in Finland than in the Netherlands. Finnish parents believed more often than Dutch parents that antimicrobials are necessary in the treatment of AOM. Conclusions: Children with AOM benefit from antimicrobial treatment. Delayed initiation of antimicrobial does not worsen the overall recovery from AOM, but it might increase the symptom burden and create economic losses. Treatment practices and parental expectations seem to interact with each other. This needs to be considered when AOM treatment guidelines are updated.