Professional development among educators pursuing a B.Ed. program in special education in Tanzania : a study of motives and perceived outcomes

Implementation of different policies and plans aiming at providing education for all is a challenge in Tanzania. The need for educators and professionals with relevant knowledge and qualifications in special education is substantial. Teacher education does not equip educators with sufficient knowledge and skills in special education and professional development programs in special education are few in number. Up to 2005 no degree programs in special education at university level were available in Tanzania. The B.Ed. Special Education program offered by the Open University of Tanzania in collaboration with Åbo Akademi University in Finland was one of the efforts aimed at addressing the big national need for teachers and other professionals with degree qualifications in special education. This pilot program offered unique possibilities to study professional development in Tanzania. The research group in this study consisted of the group of students who participated in the degree program 2005-2007. The study is guided by three theoretical perspectives: individual, social and societal. The individual perspective emphasizes psychological factors as motives, motivation, achievement, self-directed behavior and personal growth. Within social perspective, professional development is viewed as situated within the social and cultural context. The third perspective, the societal, focuses on change, reforms, innovations and transformation of school systems and societies. Accordingly, professional development is viewed as an individual, social and societal phenomenon. The overall aim of the study is to explore the participants’ motives for participating in a B.Ed. Special Education program and the perceived outcomes of the program in terms of professional development. In order to achieve the objectives of the study, a case study approach was adopted. Questionnaires and semi-structured interviews were administered in three waves between January 2007 and February 2009 to the 35 educators participating in the B.Ed. Special Education program. The findings of the study reveal that the participants expressed motives which were related to job performance, knowledge, skills, academic degree and career. Also altruistic motives were expressed by the participants in terms of helping and supporting students with special needs and their communities. The perceived outcomes of the program were in line with the expressed motives. However, the results indicate that the participants also learned new skills, as interaction skills and guidance and counseling skills. Increased self-confidence was also mentioned as an outcome. The participants also got deepened understanding of disability issues. In addition, they learned strategies for creating awareness of persons with disability in the communities. Thus the findings of the study indicate positive outcomes of the program in terms of professional development. The conclusion of the study is that individual, social and societal factors interact when it comes to explaining why Tanzanian educators in special education choose to pursue a degree program in special education. The individual motives, as increased knowledge and better prospects of career development interact with the social and societal motives to help and support vulnerable student groups. The study contributes to increased understanding of the complexity of professional development and of the realities educators meet when educational reforms are implemented in a developing country.

Innovation in a Non-Formal Adult Education Organisation – Multi-Case Study in Four Adult Education Centres

More than ever, education organisations are experiencing the need to develop new services and processes to satisfy expanding and changing customer needs and to adapt to the environmental changes and continually tightening economic situation. Innovation has been found in many studies to have a crucial role in the success of an organisation, both in the private and public sectors, in formal education and in manufacturing and services alike. However, studies concerning innovation in non-formal adult education organisations, such as adult education centres (AECs) in Finland, are still lacking. This study investigates innovation in the non-formal adult education organisation context from the perspective of organisational culture types and social networks. The objective is to determine the significant characteristics of an innovative non-formal adult education organisation. The analysis is based on data from interviews with the principals and fulltime staff of four case AECs. Before the case study, a pre-study phase is accomplished in order to obtain a preliminary understanding of innovation at AECs. The research found strong support for the need of innovation in AECs. Innovation is basically needed to accomplish the AEC system’s primary mission mentioned in the ACT on Liberal Adult Education. In addition, innovation is regarded vital to institutes and may prevent their decline. It helps the institutes to be more attractive, to enter new market, to increase customer satisfaction and to be on the cutting edge. Innovation is also seen as a solution to the shortage of resources. Innovative AECs search actively for additional resources for development work through project funding and subsidies, cooperation networks and creating a conversational and joyful atmosphere in the institute. The findings also suggest that the culture type that supports innovation at AECs is multidimensional, with an emphasis on the clan and adhocratic culture types and such values as: dynamism, future orientation, acquiring new resources, mistake tolerance, openness, flexibility, customer orientation, a risk-taking attitude, and community spirit. Active and creative internal and external cooperation also promote innovation at AECs. This study also suggests that the behaviour of a principal is crucial. The way he or she shows appreciation the staff, encouragement and support to the staff and his or her approachability and concrete participation in innovation activities have a strong effect on innovation attitudes and activities in AECs.

Maahanmuuttajaoppilaat erityiskouluissa

Immigrant Pupils in Special Education Schools The study focused on the opinions of immigrant pupils in the 1st–9th grades of basic education in four special education schools of the City of Turku and in need of special support about the following: 1. Their difficulties in going to school in general education before the transfer to a special education school. 2. Their opinions about the transfer process to special education and the changes in their school practice after being transferred to a special education school. 3. Their experiences about their school and coping in special education school. The study strengthened the idea that immigrant pupils need positive special treatment, linguistic support, individual guidance, small teaching groups and operating models that promote well-being on their integration and education path. The central educational idea of inclusive education is based on deconstructing the power structures concerning gender, ethnicity and “race” and approval of differences in the pupils. Shifting the emphasis from the pupil to working on the learning environment has resulted in special education no longer being primarily separate special education tied to a certain place, but directing the teaching more towards individuality. The central dimension of intercultural competence of a teacher working in a multicultural class seems to be the attitudes and approaches to a different pupil; the teacher must be interculturally sensitive when facing children and young people from a foreign culture. Education and teaching affect every sector of the pupil’s well-being. Learning and learning results have a connection with teaching, education and well-being. Every sector is important for the going to school and integration of an immigrant pupil in need of special support. The basis of the study is the equality of opportunities and the humanistic idea of the human being in the Finnish education policy. The immigrant pupils selected for the study represented the following language groups: Arabian, Albanian, Somali, Russian and Vietnamese. In the four special education schools, the number of immigrant pupils belonging to these language groups (2004) totalled 104. A total of 89 pupils i.e. 86% answered the questionnaire, which is sufficient considering the generalisation of the study. Although this is basically a quantitative study, the interviewing method was used in part of the study, because the questionnaires were in Finnish and consequently, it was difficult for some immigrant pupils to understand them. Understanding the questions was also affected by the fact that the age distribution in the study was very wide (7–18). According to the results of the study, the immigrants felt that the biggest drawbacks in general education were their inability to speak Finnish and lack of concentration. The actual process of being transferred to a special education class remained unclear for immigrant pupils, and they could do very little about the transfer themselves. The results show that immigrant pupils coped well in special education school; they felt that their learning ability and concentration improved in the small groups of the special education school. They considered the individual support given in the special education schools to be useful. The lower-grade immigrant pupils had a more positive attitude towards special education school than the upper-grade immigrant pupils. In all the special education schools the immigrant pupils experienced that they were in a good position in the class; girls felt this even a little more strongly than boys. The teacher-pupil-relationship was felt to be good. School bullying being so common was a negative feature experienced by immigrant pupils, who were often targets or bullies themselves. Immigrant pupils believed in their success at school and in the opportunities offered by special education schools. Generally they were of the opinion that pupils are not labelled by special school; however, upper-grade immigrant pupils were more hesitant than lower-grade immigrant pupils. This study aimed at bringing out the immigrant pupils’ own opinions. Teaching immigrant pupils in special education schools has not been very much studied in Finland, which made the topic new and even more challenging.

Perspektivmöten i skola och handledning : lärares tankar om specialpedagogisk handledning

To create a more inclusive school, an increase in multidisciplinary cooperation is needed. One possible form of collaboration could encompass the special education teacher taking on the role of a consultant for other teachers in need of support in working with heterogeneous groups of pupils. Previous research shows that special education teachers see the role as consultant as diffuse and complex. The overarching aim of the present study involves deepening the knowledge on how consultation in a special educational context can be understood and developed based on teachers’ descriptions on this particular form of activity interpreted against various perspectives on consultation. The study is qualitative in nature and rests on a hermeneutic interpretive research tradition in combination with an abductive approach. The theoretical framework consists of two different approaches to consultation: the directive and the non-directive approach. The approaches differ regarding particular emphasis on advice and reflection during the consultation and with respect to who or what should be the focus of the consultation. The two approaches are here studied through various theories such as social learning theory, Bruner's theory of scaffolding, Roger’s humanist psychology, and constructivism. Semi-structured interviews were held with eighteen special education teachers (n=9) and class teachers (n=9) working in the compulsory school. The overall interpretation of the results shows that special education consultation can be understood as three different types of consultation. Consultation as counseling which harmonizes with the directive perspective on consultation is the most prominent type. In the consultation as counseling conversation, the special educational knowledge transfer is central and the focus is placed on the pupil. Although special education knowledge transfer emerges as a unique aspect of special education consultation, there are several inherent challenges in this type of consultation that can be addressed in that teachers also describe two other types of consultation. In the reflective consultation, there is a move away from the pupil focus and toward a focus on the class teacher and the use of reflection. The reflective consultation harmonizes with the non-directive approach to consultation. This type of consultation does not as of yet have a prominent place in the Finland-Swedish school context and at this stage it is not seen as a legitimate type of consultation according to the teachers’ descriptions. Despite this, certain aspects of the reflective conversation could be given more space in the development of consultation within special educational contexts. The co-operative consultation is characterized by the teachers acting as teammates and using professional exchange as a strategy for consultation. Both teachers' knowledge is seen as central, and rather than the special education teacher acting as the expert and moderator, the teachers control the consultation together and jointly move the work along. The co-operative consultation enables the focus to move from the pupil toward the context, which can lead to the development of inclusive practices. The results indicate that this type of consultation holds potential in the development of special educational consultation that takes place between equal colleagues. The co-operative consultation opens up for a third collaborative approach to consultation, where aspects of the directive and non-directive perspective can merge and develop. The thesis concludes with the proposal that special pedagogical consultation can be understood from an integrated perspective. The characteristics of the consultation can vary depending on the type of problem or situation, while co-operative consultation can be seen as the ideal as equal colleagues meet in consultation conversations. In order to develop the co-operative consultation, both teachers are required to have knowledge of consultation as a practice, to be part of a collaborative school climate, and that teachers are provided with enough time to take part in consultations.

Extremfall, stjärnelever och verktygsskramlare : en diskursanalytisk studie av lärares tal om studerande som behöver särskilt stöd

The groups within Finnish vocational upper secondary education and training (VET) are often heterogeneous with respect to the student's need for support in their studies. According to the national core curricula, Special Education Needs (SEN) students should in the first place, get their education in the same group as everyone else. This dissertation aims to clarify and create an understanding about how the ideals and intention of equality in education is constructed in communication among teachers in VET in the Swedish-speaking parts of Finland. Through this understanding it should be possible to highlight a potential which could ultimately contribute to a positive development of a more inclusive education within VET. The epistemological platform of the study is to be found within the post structuralist philosophy of language that is considered as subsumed in a social constructionist thinking. The data has been collected through focus group discussions in groups of 3–6 participants (teachers) in seven schools in Finnish-Swedish VET. The analyses are based on a discursive psychological analysis combined with an analysis based on Michel Foucault's concepts with an emphasis on the subject, government and power. Four discourser where identified in the analysis of teachers' constructions of the educational assignment in relation to SEN students. The most dominant was discussing the educational assignment as a pragmatic project i.e. as a matter of transmission of knowledge. The discourse included both interpretative repertoires where the heterogeneous group was constructed as self-evident and possible to manage as well as a constructed as an impossible project. The educational assignment was also constructed as a holistic project, as part of a democratic project, and as a labor market project. Each discourse contains both including as well as excluding features in relation to SEN students. The development of an inclusive practice can and should therefore include elements from all of them. Three discourses were identified in the analysis concerning teachers' versions of SEN students: students with difficulties and problems; students who do not use or do not have ability and students who are irresponsible and lack the will to study. Within the various discourses and interpretative repertoires were both constructs when teachers described a concern and kindness in relation to the individual SEN student and constructions where teachers mainly expressed fears that other students in the group would be negatively affected by students in need of special support. Results from the third research question conclude the results from the two others, the analysis is done out of a government perspective. In the material use of different government techniques are identified: disciplinary power through direct reprimands; pastoral power by a desire of insight in order to promote the opportunities for consultation and the use of bio-power that primarily focuses on what is best for the population and whose tool racism results in a legitimation of the exclusion of SEN students. The conclusion is that teachers in VET need to pay attention to inclusive and exclusive elements identified in various discourses.

”Kielestä kiinni”. Kuudesluokkalaisten maahanmuuttajaoppilaiden suomen kielen tason vaihtelut

Tämän tutkimuksen tarkoituksena on selvittää, minkälaista vaihtelua esiintyy maahanmuuttajaoppilaiden suomen kielen taidoissa peruskoulun kuudennella luokalla. Tutkimuksen tavoitteena on myös selvittää, minkälainen yhteys taustamuuttujilla (sukupuoli, äidinkieli, maahantuloikä, maahantulon syy, maassaoloaika ja vanhempien koulutausta) ja opetusjärjestelyillä, kuten perusopetukseen valmistavalla opetuksella, suomi toisena kielenä -opetuksella ja oman äidinkielen opetuksella, on suomen kielen taidon tasoon. Lisäksi tutkimuksen tavoitteena on selvittää oppilaan käyttämän kielen (suomen kieli ja äidinkieli) yhteyttä suomen kielen taidon tasoon. Tutkimusmetodina toimi mixed methods -tutkimus, ja tutkimuksen lähestymistapoja olivat kvantitatiivinen survey-tutkimus ja kvalitatiivinen sisällön analyysi. Tutkimukseen osallistui 219 maahanmuuttajaoppilasta 20:stä Turun koulusta. Tutkimusaineisto kerättiin Turun erityisopettajien ja suomi toisena kielenä -opettajien laatiman kielitestipaketin avulla. Oppilaan suullista ja kirjallista tuottamista arvioivat lasta opettavat opettajat eurooppalaisen viitekehyksen kielitaitotasojen kriteereitä käyttäen. Oppilaat arvioivat omaa äidinkielen ja suomen kielen taitoaan. Lisäksi oppilaat ja vanhemmat täyttivät tutkijan laatimat taustatietolomakkeet. Kielitestien tulosten mukaan oppilaista yli puolella oli tyydyttävä suomen kielen taito. Kaikista neljästä kielellisestä osiosta maahanmuuttajataustaiset oppilaat menestyivät parhaiten rakennekokeessa ja sanelussa, kun taas kuullun ja luetun ymmärtämisen tulokset olivat heikompia. Opettajien arviointien perusteella oppilaiden suulliset taidot vastasivat keskimäärin itsenäisen kielenkäyttäjän osaajan tasoa (B2) ja kirjoittamistaidot kynnystasoa (B1). Oppilaiden suomi toisena kielenä -arvosanan keskiarvo oli 7,26. Suomessa asumisen kestolla, maahantulon syyllä, äidinkielellä, maahantuloiällä, ja vanhempien koulutaustaustalla oli tilastollisesti merkitsevä yhteys suomen kielen taidon tasoon. Mitä kauemmin oppilaat olivat asuneet Suomessa ja mitä nuorempina he olivat tulleet Suomeen, sitä paremmin he menestyivät kielitesteissä. Paluumuuttajat menestyivät kielitaitotehtävissä kaikkein parhaiten ja pakolaiset heikoiten. Somalinkieliset erottuivat muista kieliryhmän edustajista heikoimpina suomen kielen taidon tasoltaan. Venäjänkieliset ja vietnaminkieliset saavuttivat parhaat tulokset kaikissa mittareissa. Erityisesti äidin korkeampi koulutustaso oli yhteydessä oppilaiden korkeampaan suomen kielen taidon tasoon. Oppilaat arvioivat suomen kielen taitonsa omaa äidinkieltään paremmaksi puhumisessa, lukemisessa ja kirjoittamisessa. Parhaiten eri mittareissa menestyivät oppilaat, jotka eivät olleet osallistuneet perusopetukseen valmistavaan opetukseen eivätkä erilliseen suomi toisena kielenä -opetukseen. Omaa äidinkieltään enemmän opiskelleet menestyivät kielitaitotehtävissä paremmin kuin vähän aikaa omaa äidinkieltään opiskelleet, mutta yhtä hyvin kuin ne, jotka eivät olleet opiskelleet omaa äidinkieltään lainkaan. Oppilaat, jotka puhuivat kaveriensa kanssa sekä omaa äidinkieltään että suomen kieltä, osoittautuivat kielitaidon tasoltaan paremmiksi kielitesteissä ja opettajien arvioinneissa.

Changing teachers´ practices in regular schools enrolling children with visual impairment

The number of persons with visual impairment in Tanzania is estimated to over 1.6 million. About half a million of these persons are children aged 7-13. Only about 1% of these children are enrolled in schools. The special schools and units are too few and in most cases they are far away from the children’s homes. More and more regular schools are enrolling children with visual impairment, but the schools lack financial resources, tactile teaching materials and trained special education teachers. Children with visual impairment enrolled in regular schools seldom get enough support and often fail in examinations. The general aim of this study was to contribute to increased knowledge and understanding about how teachers can change their teaching practices and thus facilitate the learning of children with visual impairment included in regular classrooms as they participate in an action research project. The project was conducted in a primary school in a poor rural region with a high frequency of blindness and visual impairment. The school was poorly resourced and the average number of pupils per class was 90. The teachers who participated in the collaborative action research project were the 14 teachers who taught blind or visually impaired pupils in grades 4 and 6, in total 6 pupils. The action research project was conducted during a period of 6 months and was carried out in five cycles. The teachers were actively involved in all the project activities; identifying challenges, planning solutions, producing teaching materials, reflecting on outcomes, collaborating and evaluating. Empirical data was collected with questionnaires, interviews, observations and focus group discussions. The findings of the study show that the teachers managed to change their teaching practices through systematic reflection, analysis and collaboration. The teachers produced a variety of tactile teaching materials, which facilitated the learning of the pupils with visual impairment. The pupils learned better and felt more included in the regular classes. The teachers gained new knowledge and skills. They grew professionally and started to collaborate with each other. The study contributes to new knowledge of how collaborative action research can be conducted in the area of special education in a Tanzanian school context. The study has also relevance to the planning of school-based professional development programs and teacher education programs in Tanzania and in other low-income countries. The results also point at strategies which can promote inclusion of children with disabilities in regular schools.

Speciell och lycklig: en studie om specialundervisning och välbefinnande

Syftet med denna studie var att analysera relationen mellan erhållen specialundervisning i grundskolan och välmående i vuxen ålder. Välmående mäts i den här studien utifrån hur nöjda med livet respondenterna är, eftersom det visat sig vara en god indikator på hur individer upplever sitt välbefinnande. De specifika forsknings-frågorna i studien är: 1. Hurdant samband finns det mellan erhållen specialundervisning i årskurs 9 och livstillfredsställelsen fem år senare? 2. a) Hurdana skillnader finns det i livstillfredsställelsen som ung vuxen mellan de som fått specialundervisning och de som inte fått specialundervisning i årskurs 9? b) Hurdana skillnader finns det efter att arbetslöshet och generell självuppfattning kontrollerats för? Ett svagt samband gick att påvisa mellan erhållen specialundervisning i grundskolan och livstillfredsställelsen i vuxen ålder. Resultaten från den här studien visar dock att majoriteten av dem som fått specialundervisning i grundskolan har ett gott välbefinnande i vuxen ålder, även om medelpoängen för livstillfredsställelsen visade sig vara något lägre jämfört med dem som inte fått specialundervisning. Självuppfattning och arbetslöshet hade dock en signifikant inverkan på välmåendet och således även på skillnaderna. Efter kontrollanalysen för de här två faktorerna fanns inga statistiskt signifikanta skillnader kvar i livstillfredsställelsen mellan dem som fått specialundervisning och dem som inte fått specialundervisning. Specialundervisningen kan därmed antas tjäna sitt syfte i att stöda eleverna och motverka de negativa konsekvenser skolsvårigheterna kan ha för välbefinnandet. Resultaten tyder dock på att det i skolan ännu finns skäl att stärka självuppfattningen bland elever som får specialundervisning och fortsätta ge eleverna byggstenar som hjälper dem att få en utbildning och ett framtida arbete. På sikt främjar det välbefinnandet.

Sopeutumattomien oppilaiden tunne- ja itsesäätelytaitojen kehittyminen: Oppilaiden ja opettajien arvioita ja kokemuksia Aggression portaat -interventiosta

Tässä tutkimuksessa tarkastellaan sopeutumattomien erityisoppilaiden tunne- ja itsesäätelytaitojen kehittymistä Aggression portaat -interventio-ohjelman avulla kolmen vuoden tutkimusjakson aikana. Käsite sopeutumaton oppilas ei ole yksiselitteisesti määriteltävissä, mutta tässä tutkimuksessa sillä tarkoitetaan yleisopetussuunnitelman mukaan opiskelevaa oppilasta, joka käyttäytymiseen ja tunne-elämään liittyvien haasteidensa vuoksi on saanut siirron erityisopetuksen oppilaaksi ja saa enintään 10 oppilaan opetusryhmässä erityistä pedagogista tukea. Tutkimuksen yksi keskeinen tehtävä oli tutkia, onko tunne- ja itsesäätelytaitojen opettamisesta hyötyä sopeutumattomien oppilaiden tunteiden hallinnan ja käyttäytymisen itsesäätelyn kannalta. Tutkimuksen teoreettisena viitekehyksenä on Rose-Krasnorin (1997) malli yksilön sosioemotionaalisesta kompetenssista täydennettynä muiden tutkijoiden näkemyksillä. Sosioemotionaalinen kompetenssi on yläkäsite, johon kuuluvat alakäsitteinä tunne- ja itsesäätelytaidot, sosiokognitiiviset taidot ja sosiaaliset taidot. Lisäksi sosioemotionaaliseen kompetenssiin vaikuttavat kiintymyssuhteet ja osallisuus sekä tavoitteet vuorovaikutuksessa ja konteksti. Tässä tutkimuksessa keskitytään tunne- ja itsesäätelytaitoihin. Interventioryhmän (N=36) muodostivat Varsinais-Suomen alueella opiskelevat sopeutumattomien oppilaiden erityiskoulun 8-13-vuotiaat oppilaat, joille opetettiin tunne- ja itsesäätelytaitoja Aggression portaat -opetusmateriaaliin (Cacciatore 2007) pohjautuvan intervention avulla. Kontrolliryhmän (N=26) oppilaat olivat interventioryhmän oppilaiden ikäisiä ja he opiskelivat Varsinais-Suomen alueen kouluissa pienluokissa myös käyttäytymiseen ja tunne-elämään liittyvien haasteidensa vuoksi. Kontrolliryhmän oppilaat eivät saaneet tutkimusjakson aikana interventio-ohjelman mukaista opetusta. Interventioryhmän oppilaat kävivät erityiskoulua, jossa kaikilla oppilailla oli sopeutumisongelmia ja kontrolliryhmän oppilaat opiskelivat yleisopetuksen koulujen yhteydessä olevilla sopeutumattomien oppilaiden pienluokilla. Tutkimusaineisto on kerätty vuosina 2010-2012. Tutkimusmetodeina olivat sekä oppilaille että opettajille laaditut Webropol-alustaiset kyselyt ja oppilaiden kirjoittamat väkivalta-aiheiset tekstit. Tutkimus- ja kontrolliryhmän oppilaille pidettiin ”Tunteiden hallinta ja käyttäytyminen”- kyselyn avulla alkumittaus syksyllä 2009 ja mittaus toistettiin keväällä 2010, 2011 ja 2012. Kyselyiden avulla selvitettiin, miten oppilaiden tunteiden kokeminen ja ilmaiseminen sekä tunteiden hallinta ja käyttäytymisen itsesäätely muuttuivat tutkimusjakson aikana. Kyselyssä kartoitettiin myös oppilaiden kokemuksia kiusaamisena ilmenevästä väkivallasta. Aineistolähtöisen sisällönanalyysin avulla selvitettiin oppilaiden kirjoitelmista heidän ajatuksiaan ja näkemyksiään väkivallasta ja ehdotuksia keinoista väkivallan vähentämiseksi. Keväällä 2012 interventioryhmän oppilaille ja opettajille laadittujen erillisten kyselyiden avulla selvitettiin sekä oppilaiden että opettajien arvioita ja kokemuksia oppilaiden tunne- ja itsesäätelytaitojen muutoksesta interventio-ohjelman avulla. Lisäksi oppilaat ja opettajat arvioivat pidettyjen tunnetaitotuntien hyödyllisyyttä oppilaille. Interventioryhmän opettajat arvioivat myös Aggression portaat -interventiomateriaalin käyttökelpoisuutta. Vuoden 2014 Perusopetuksen opetussuunnitelman perusteissa esitetyt velvoitteet opettaa kouluissa oppilaille tunne- ja vuorovaikutustaitoja edellyttävät tietoa konkreettisista käytänteistä ja tutkimusperustaisista interventio-ohjelmista. Tämän tutkimuksen tulokset osoittavat, että interventioryhmän muodostaneet sopeutumattomat oppilaat hyötyivät Aggression portaat -interventiosta. Heidän tunne- ja itsesäätelytaidoissaan tapahtui myönteistä kehitystä etenkin myönteisten tunnekokemusten lisääntymisen ja toisiin kohdistuneen fyysisen väkivallan vähenemisen osalta. Myös suhtautuminen väkivaltapelien ikärajoihin oli merkittävästi myönteisempää kuin kontrolliryhmän oppilailla, joilla kielteinen asenne lisääntyi selvästi tutkimusjakson aikana. Lisäksi interventioryhmän oppilailla oli keinoja itsensä rentouttamiseksi, päinvastoin kuin kontrolliryhmän oppilailla, joilla keinottomuuden kokemus jopa lisääntyi. Interventioryhmän oppilaat suhtautuivat hyvin kielteisesti toisen yllyttämiseen väkivaltaiseen tekoon ja kirjoittivat enemmän ajatuksiaan väkivallasta tuoden esille runsaasti ehdotuksia keinoista väkivallan vähentämiseksi. Myös oppilaat ja opettajat kokivat interventio-ohjelman oppilaiden kehityksen kannalta hyödylliseksi ja opettajat myös interventiomateriaalin käyttökelpoiseksi.