Pairs Trading -strategia Suomen osakemarkkinoilla

Tutkielman tavoitteena on selvittää soveltuvatko suomalaiset osakkeet parikaupankäyntiin ja voidaanko niillä luoda tuottavia kaupankäyntistrategioita. Tutkielmassa tarkastellaan pystytäänkö suomalaisista osakkeista muodostamaan parikaupankäynnin kannalta toimivia osakepareja. Aineisto koostuu kaikkiaan 53 tutkitusta yrityksestä, joiden joukosta valitaan paras osakepari kultakin viideltä toimialalta. Tutkimusperiodi käsittää vuodet 2004–2007, eli se sisältää noin 1000 kaupankäyntipäivää per osa-ke. Viittä valittua osakeparia tutkitaan tarkemmin tilastollisilla ja teknisillä analyysimenetelmillä. Empiiristen tulosten perusteella suomalaiset osakkeet soveltuvat hyvin parikaupankäyntiin. Jokaisella viidellä tutkitulla osakeparilla ilmeni selvää hintojen erkaantumista ja konvergoitumista, joten niillä olisi tutkimuspe-riodin aikana pystynyt käymään menestyksekästä parikauppaa.

Pairs trading profitability in the Finnish stock market: A comparison between three methods

Pairs trading is an algorithmic trading strategy that is based on the historical co-movement of two separate assets and trades are executed on the basis of degree of relative mispricing. The purpose of this study is to explore one new and alternative copula-based method for pairs trading. The objective is to find out whether the copula method generates more trading opportunities and higher profits than the more traditional distance and cointegration methods applied extensively in previous empirical studies. Methods are compared by selecting top five pairs from stocks of the large and medium-sized companies in the Finnish stock market. The research period includes years 2006-2015. All the methods are proven to be profitable and the Finnish stock market suitable for pairs trading. However, copula method doesn’t generate more trading opportunities or higher profits than the other methods. It seems that the limitations of the more traditional methods are not too restrictive for this particular sample data.

Perceptions of green branding and identity building amongst small Finnish textile producers

The textile industry is one of the most polluting industries in the world. The amount of air and water pollution it causes puts a burden on the environment. There are companies who have taken the environmental and social aspects into account in the their production and chosen to operate in a green manner. This thesis studies how the phenomenon of green branding is seen from the perspectives of small Finnish textile companies. The theory used in this thesis has to do with green branding and identity building. The theory is used to analyze the results of the empirical findings. The main research question that the thesis aims to answer is how green branding is perceived within the Finnish textile industry. In order to answer the main research question, empirical data was collected from five relevant companies within the Finnish textile industry. The companies interviewed for the study were WST, Saana ja Olli, RCM, R-collection and Tiensivu. The study was conducted as a multiple case based study where multiple experts from green companies were interviewed. The experts were all owners or employees of companies that have a so-called green brand identity. The data was collected through semi-structured interviews, where the relevant experts from each company were interviewed either by themselves, in pairs or in groups. The data that was collected for this study was primary data, and the results of the study are mainly based on the experiences and opinions of the experts interviewed. The data collected does not cover the entire green textile industry within Finland, but study does however give a fairly comprehensive view of the phenomenon, as the textile industry in Finland is quite concise. The general findings of the study show that all experts from the companies interviewed agreed that a green brand identity does benefit their company in one way or the other. The findings also show contradictions with the older theory (eg. Charter et al. 1999, Pickett et al. 1995), and perhaps give a more modern view of the thoughts within the industry.