Key factors in transforming university internationalization into commercial activity in Finland. Case of University of Turku

Globalization, developments in ICT, emergence of knowledge society and other changes have reformed the environment for international higher education during the past few decades. Consequently, higher education sector has moved towards more marketing-oriented system, and universities have started to undertake commercial activities as part of their internationalization. This development has emerged to Finland as well, which forms the basis for this study. The purpose is to examine commercialization in Finnish university landscape and to investigate the ways Finnish university could capitalize its international activities and educational knowledge for export. The research question of the study is: What are the key factors in transforming university internationalization into commercial activity in the Finnish university landscape? The main problem is further divided into three sub-questions: 1) How can a university internationalize; 2) what are the motivational factors behind university internationalization and commercialization; and 3) how can higher education be developed into export services and products? The research was conducted as a qualitative case study of University of Turku. Methods used for gathering and examining data were interviewing and document analysis. Primary data was collected through four individual semi-structured interviews, which were conducted face-to-face. Secondary data that included reports, articles and electronic materials such as university web pages, was used to complement the primary data. The results were analyzed by theming the data into three broader categories of internationalization activities; drivers and motivations and; education export activities. After the data was organized in themes, analysis continued by comparing different parts of data and finding patterns that would explain the phenomenon in Finnish universities. According to the empirical data, University of Turku is currently on the growth state of internationalization with strategies such as internationalization of curriculum, establishment of international research groups, mobility of students and academics, international networking and support services. Commercialization phenomenon is still rather new to the case university, but it has already developed educational products and services for export. The study concludes that university internationalization cannot be directly transformed into commercial activities in the Finnish context, but the universities need to be active in actually creating educational products. The key factors found in this study include: 1) the Finnish government policies behind the current hype of export education; 2) the potential and knowledge capacity of universities for exports; 3) need for additional profits; 4) further internationalization through commercial activities; 5) recognizing and exploiting the specific areas of strength and 6) establishing of cooperative partnerships for better products.

Turun yliopiston julkaisut 2006 - Publications of the University of Turku 2006

Bibliografia Turun yliopiston tieteellisestä julkaisutoiminnasta vuodelta 2006.

Turun yliopiston julkaisut 2007 - Publications of the University of Turku 2007

This bibliography lists scientific publications by the staff of the University of Turku from the year 2007.

Näkökulmia kielen oppimisen käytäntöihin. Turun yliopiston kielikeskus 30 vuotta - Perspectives on Language Learning in Practice. University of Turku Language Centre 30-year Celebration

Tämä julkaisu ilmestyy Turussa 18.–19.5.2009 järjestettävien valtakunnallisten kielikeskuspäivien yhteydessä. Turun yliopiston kielikeskus viettää samaan aikaan 30-vuotisjuhlaansa. Erään luokittelun mukaan 30–45-vuotias elää varsinaista keski-ikäänsä, kun taas joissakin katsotaan, että 28–35 vuoden ikä on vasta ns. jäsentymisen vaihe ja että varhainenkin keski-ikä sijoittuu vasta ikävuosiin 35–42. Voitaneen siis sanoa, että kielikeskus on ainakin ohittanut nuoruusvuodet ja on jäsentymässä tai siirtymässä keski-ikään. Tämä tuo mukanaan tietynlaista kypsymistä, itsensä varaan asettumista, imagon ja profiilin vakiintumista. Tähän kasvuun saattaa liittyä myös jonkinlainen aikuistumisen kriisi. Sen myötä kuitenkin ymmärrys lisääntyy ja oman paikan rakentaminen yliopistoyhteisössä voimistuu. Arvo- ja ajatusmaailmaan tulee uusia kehityspiirteitä: olemassaolon ja toiminnan syvemmät perustelut, illuusioiden väheneminen, hallinnan tunne, tyydytys onnistuneesta toiminnasta ja realistinen voiman tunto. Laitos esittäytyy julkaisussa 13 kirjoituksen välityksellä. Tekstit ovat sisällöltään ja käsittelytavaltaan hyvin erilaisia, mutta juuri sellaisina ne valottavat monipuolisesti laitoksen ja sen henkilökunnan toimintaa ja tuntemuksia. Kuvaukset valaisevat laitoksen erikoisluonnetta ja kuvailevat henkilökunnan erilaisia tehtäviä. Kielikeskus paljastuu dynaamisemmaksi ja heterogeenisemmaksi yksiköksi kuin ensi silmäyksellä saattaa luulla, mutta juuri siinä piilee sen voima ja rikkaus. Juhlakirjaan toivottiin kirjoituksia kielikeskuksen opetukseen tai toimintaan liittyvistä aiheista. Kirjaan sisältyy selontekojen ja kuvausten lisäksi muutamia tiukan tieteellisiä artikkeleita. Joukossa on myös joitakin esseitä, jotka koskettelevat kielen ja kulttuurin välisiä suhteita ja luovat katsauksia kielikeskuksen monikulttuuriseen arkeen. Useassa kirjoituksessa käsitellään kielipedagogisia ja -didaktisia kysymyksiä. Erityisesti tulee esiin kielikeskuksessa viime vuosina tehty uudistustyö opetuksen ja oppimisedellytysten parantamiseksi. Samalla kun muun muassa opetusteknologiaa ja kielen oppimisen käytäntöjä virtuaalisissa oppimisympäristöissä on kehitetty, opettajan rooli on muovautunut uudentyyppiseksi: perinteisen opetushenkilöstön ja muun henkilökunnan tehtävät ja toimenkuva ovat selvästi lähentyneet toisiaan. Tämä suuntaus on jatkunut jo kauan ja jatkunee tulevaisuudessakin. Kolmekymmentä viime vuotta ovat olleet yliopistossa erittäin nopean muutoksen aikaa. Tämä on näkynyt erityisesti kielikeskuksen toiminnan laajenemisessa ja kehityksessä, joissa tosin on ollut notkahduksiakin. Varsinkin nopea kansainvälistyminen, Euroopan yhteisön laajentuminen ja koko maailman avautuminen ovat tuoneet mukanaan uusia haasteita, joihin kielikeskus on heti tarttunut: kielivalikoimaa on laajennettava, kielitaitoa kohennettava ja erilaisia kulttuureja tunnettava ja ymmärrettävä syvällisemmin. Turun yliopiston kielikeskus pyrkii omalta osaltaan täyttämään nämä velvoitteet ja luomaan toiminnallaan mahdollisimman hyvät edellytykset yliopiston kansainvälistymiselle. Nämä seikat on otettu huomioon laitoksen toimintalinjojen suunnittelussa ja kehittämisessä. Kieli-ja viestintäopintojen rakenteiden uudistamista jatketaan yhteistyössä tiedekuntien kanssa. Opintojen valinnaisuutta ja vapaaehtoisuutta pyritään lisäämään sekä turvaamaan kielivalintojen monipuolisuus ja kieliosaamisen laajaalaisuus resurssien mukaan. Toimintaa kehitetään niin, että siinä otetaan entistä paremmin huomioon yhteiskunnan monikulttuuristuminen ja Euroopan komission tavoite, jonka mukaan jokaisen EU- kansalaisen tulisi osata oman äidinkielensä lisäksi vähintään kahta yhteisön kieltä. Samalla otetaan huomioon globalisaation tuomat uudet haasteet tukemalla tärkeimpien Euroopan yhteisön ulkopuolisten kielten opetusta (mm. venäjä, kiina, japani, arabia). Edelleen kielikeskus seuraa tarkoin keskustelua Suomen kielikoulutuspolitiikan perusteista ja tavoitteista ja ottaa toimintansa suunnittelussa huomioon valtakunnalliset suositukset Suomen kielikoulutuksen uudistamiseksi vastaamaan nykypäivän ja tulevaisuuden tarpeita ja tavoitteita. Se että kielikeskus on viime vuosina selvästikin vakiinnuttanut asemansa yliopiston strategisesti tärkeänä yksikkönä, ei tarkoita sitä, että nyt voitaisiin turvautua pelkästään vanhoihin toimintamalleihin ja rutiineihin. Päinvastoin, koko maailmassa, suomalaisessa yhteiskunnassa ja yliopistojen toiminnassa tapahtuneet ja tapahtuvat suuret muutokset edellyttävät kielikeskustoimintojen vireää kehittämistä ja uudistusmieltä. Laitos onkin ilmoittanut tulossopimuksessaan tukevansa opetuskokeiluja ja innovatiivisia ratkaisuja. Opettajajohtoisen opetuksen ohella on voimakkaasti kehitetty myös ohjattua itseopiskelua, monimuotoopetusta sekä vaihtoehtoisia ja uudentyyppisiä oppimismuotoja. Uutta opetusteknologiaa käytetään tehokkaasti hyväksi ja kehitetään edelleen. Opetuksessa ja ohjauksessa käytetään suomalaisten ja ulkomaisten opiskelijoiden työpanosta. Laitoksen suunnittelu- ja kehittämistyössä opiskelijat ovat toimineet viime vuosina aktiivisesti ja ansiokkaasti: yhteistyö ylioppilaskunnan kanssa toimii erinomaisesti, ja sitä on tarkoitus vielä tehostaa. Laitos on saanut runsaasti kiitosta korkealaatuisesta toiminnastaan: muun muassa v. 1998 ja 2008 Turun yliopiston vuoden opettajan palkinnon, v. 1999 Turun yliopiston parhaan koulutusyksikön palkinnon ja v. 2007 vuoden opintojaksopalkinnon. On toivottavaa, että tämä tuloksellinen työ jatkuisi ja entisestäänkin paranisi tulevina vuosina. Hyvät tulokset on saavutettu kovilla ponnistuksilla ja tiukalla sitoutumisella työhön. Aina se ei ole ollut aivan helppoa nopeiden muutosten myllerryksessä, tiukentuneessa resurssitilanteessa ja vaatimusten ja odotusten ristiriidoissa. Toivon, että pääosin hyvin sujunut yhteistyö yliopiston johdon, tiedekuntien ja opiskelijoiden kanssa sekä henkilökunnan keskuudessa voisi säilyä ja kehittyä ja että alkava vuosikymmen kielikeskuksen historiassa voisi olla entistä parempi. Hyvä yhteistyö on hyvien tulosten edellytys. Suurten uudistusten vuosi 2010 sisältää mahdollisuuden parempaan, mutta se on samalla myös riski ehkä hyvinkin paljon muuttuvassa toimintaympäristössä. Lainaan lopuksi roomalaisen historioitsijan Sallustiuksen sanat: Concordia res parvae crescunt, discordia maximae dilabuntur. Yksimielisyys saa pienetkin asiat kukoistamaan, eripura suuretkin tuhoaa. Turun yliopistolla on hyvä kielikeskus, jota kannattaa vaalia ja tukea. Kiitän kaikkia kirjoittajia ja juhlajulkaisun toimittajia Minna Maijalaa, Timo Hulkkoa ja Jane Honkaa tämän julkaisun synnystä. Samoin esitän kiitokset kielikeskuksen kirjallisen viestinnän lehtoreille, Markus Lahdelle ja Arja Lampiselle, jot ka ovat nähneet vaivaa tekstien kielellisinä korjaajina. Koko kielikeskuksen nykyistä ja aikaisempaa henkilökuntaa kiitän työstä, jota laitoksen hyväksi on tehty kuluneiden 30 vuoden aikana. Erityisen kiitoksen ansaitsee laitoksen juhlatoimikunta kaikista juhlavuoden järjestelyistä.

Turun yliopiston julkaisut 2008 - Publication of the University of Turku 2008

Bibliografia Turun yliopiston tieteellisestä julkaisutoiminnasta vuodelta 2008

Turun yliopiston julkaisut 2009 - Publications of the University of Turku 2009

Bibliografia Turun yliopiston tieteellisestä julkaisutoiminnasta vuodelta 2009.

Turun yliopiston julkaisut - Publications of the University of Turku 2010

Bibliografia Turun yliopiston tieteellisestä julkaisutoiminnasta vuodelta 2010.

Tutors as mediators of exchange student experiences: evaluation of the international student tutor system at the University of Turku

As academic student mobility is increasing, improving the functionality of international operations is recognised as a competitive advantage at tertiary education institutions. Although many scholars have researched the experiences of exchange students, the role of student tutors and their contribution to exchange students’ experiences is still an unknown factor. This research examines international tutoring at the University of Turku, and aims to understand better the way tutoring contributes to exchange experiences and to explore the functionality of the tutor system and discover areas for improvements. To achieve these goals, the research seeks to answer the fundamental research question: What is the role of tutors in mediating exchange experiences? The theoretical framework combines literature on mediating exchange experiences, the phenomenon of studying abroad, the process of adaptation, the importance of cross-cultural communication, and the role of student tutors as mediators. Based on the literature review, a theoretical model for studying the mediation of exchange experiences is introduced. The model’s applicability and validity is examined through a case study. Three methods were used in the empirical research: surveys, participant observations, and interviews. These methods provided extensive data from three major parties of the tutor system: tutors, exchange students, and the international office. The findings of the research reveal that tutoring – instrumental leading and social and cultural mediating – generates both negative and positive experiences depending on the individuals’ expectations, motivations, relationships, and the nature of the tutoring. Although functional, there are a few weaknesses in the tutor system. Tutors tend to act as effective instrumental leaders, but often fail to create a friendship and contribute to the exchange students’ experience through social and cultural mediation, which is significantly more important in the exchange students’ overall experience in terms of building networks, adapting, gaining emotional experiences, and achieving the stage of personal development and mental change. Based on the weaknesses, three improvements are suggested: (1) increasing comprehensive sharing of information, effective communication, and collective cooperation, (2) emphasising the importance of social and cultural mediation and increasing the frequency of interaction between tutors and exchange students, and (3) improving the recruitment and training, revising the process of reporting and rewarding, and finally, enhancing services and coordination.

Evaluation of Teacher Education Programs by Students and Graduates

The purpose of this research was to do a repeated cross-sectional research on class teachers who study in the 4th year and also graduated at the Faculty of Education, University of Turku between the years of 2000 through 2004. Specifically, seven research questions were addressed to target the main purpose of the study: How do class teacher education masters’ degree senior students and graduates rate “importance; effectiveness; and quality” of training they have received at the Faculty of Education? Are there significant differences between overall ratings of importance; effectiveness and quality of training by year of graduation, sex, and age (for graduates) and sex and age (for senior students)? Is there significant relationship between respondents’ overall ratings of importance; effectiveness and their overall ratings of the quality of training and preparation they have received? Are there significant differences between graduates and senior students about importance, effectiveness, and quality of teacher education programs? And what do teachers’ [Graduates] believe about how increasing work experience has changed their opinions of their preservice training? Moreover the following concepts related to the instructional activities were studied: critical thinking skills, communication skills, attention to ethics, curriculum and instruction (planning), role of teacher and teaching knowledge, assessment skills, attention to continuous professional development, subject matters knowledge, knowledge of learning environment, and using educational technology. Researcher also tried to find influence of some moderator variables e.g. year of graduation, sex, and age on the dependent and independent variables. This study consisted of two questionnaires (a structured likert-scale and an open ended questionnaire). The population in study 1 was all senior students and 2000-2004 class teacher education masters’ degree from the departments of Teacher Education Faculty of Education at University of Turku. Of the 1020 students and graduates the researcher was able to find current addresses of 675 of the subjects and of the 675 graduates contacted, 439 or 66.2 percent responded to the survey. The population in study 2 was all class teachers who graduated from Turku University and now work in the few basic schools (59 Schools) in South- West Finland. 257 teachers answered to the open ended web-based questions. SPSS was used to produce standard deviations; Analysis of Variance; Pearson Product Moment Correlation (r); T-test; ANOVA, Bonferroni post-hoc test; and Polynomial Contrast tests meant to analyze linear trend. An alpha level of .05 was used to determine statistical significance. The results of the study showed that: A majority of the respondents (graduates and students) rated the overall importance, effectiveness and quality of the teacher education programs as important, effective and good. Generally speaking there were only a few significant differences between the cohorts and groups related to the background variables (gender, age). The different cohorts were rating the quality of the programs very similarly but some differences between the cohorts were found in the importance and effectiveness ratings. Graduates of 2001 and 2002 rated the importance of the program significantly higher than 2000 graduates. The effectiveness of the programs was rated significantly higher by 2001 and 2003 graduates than other groups. In spite of these individual differences between cohorts there were no linear trends among the year cohorts in any measure. In respondents’ ratings of the effectiveness of teacher education programs there was significant difference between males and females; females rated it higher than males. There were no significant differences between males’ and females’ ratings of the importance and quality of programs. In the ratings there was only one difference between age groups. Older graduates (35 years or older) rated the importance of the teacher training significantly higher that 25-35 years old graduates. In graduates’ ratings there were positive but relatively low correlations between all variables related to importance, effectiveness and quality of Teacher Education Programs. Generally speaking students’ ratings about importance, effectiveness and quality of teacher education program were very positive. There was only one significant difference related to the background variables. Females rated higher the effectiveness of the program. The comparison of students’ and graduates’ perception about importance, effectiveness, and quality of teacher education programs showed that there were no significant differences between graduates and students in the overall ratings. However there were differences in some individual variables. Students rated higher in importance of “Continuous Professional Development”, effectiveness of “Critical Thinking Skills” and “Using Educational Technology” and quality of “Advice received from the advisor”. Graduates rated higher in importance of “Knowledge of Learning Environment” and effectiveness of “Continuous Professional Development”. According to the qualitative data of study 2 some graduates expressed that their perceptions have not changed about the importance, effectiveness, and quality of training that they received during their study time. They pointed out that teacher education programs have provided them the basic theoretical/formal knowledge and some training of practical routines. However, a majority of the teachers seems to have somewhat critical opinions about the teacher education. These teachers were not satisfied with teacher education programs because they argued that the programs failed to meet their practical demands in different everyday situations of the classroom e.g. in coping with students’ learning difficulties, multiprofessional communication with parents and other professional groups (psychologists and social workers), and classroom management problems. Participants also emphasized more practice oriented knowledge of subject matter, evaluation methods and teachers’ rights and responsibilities. Therefore, they (54.1% of participants) suggested that teacher education departments should provide more practice-based courses and programs as well as closer collaboration between regular schools and teacher education departments in order to fill gap between theory and practice.

Maritime transportation in the Gulf of Finland in 2007 and in 2015

The Gulf of Finland is said to be one of the densest operated sea areas in the world. It is a shallow and economically vulnerable sea area with dense passenger and cargo traffic of which petroleum transports have a share of over 50 %. The winter conditions add to the risks of maritime traffic in the Gulf of Finland. It is widely believed that the growth of maritime transportation will continue also in the future. The Gulf of Finland is surrounded by three very different national economies with, different maritime transportation structures. Finland is a country of high GDP/per capita with a diversified economic structure. The number of ports is large and the maritime transportation consists of many types of cargoes: raw materials, industrial products, consumer goods, coal and petroleum products, and the Russian transit traffic of e.g. new cars and consumer goods. Russia is a large country with huge growth potential; in recent years, the expansion of petroleum exports has lead to a strong economic growth, which is also apparent in the growth of maritime transports. Russia has been expanding its port activities in the Gulf of Finland and it is officially aiming to transport its own imports and exports through the Russian ports in the future; now they are being transported to great extend through the Finnish, Estonian and other Baltic ports. Russia has five ports in the Gulf of Finland. Estonia has also experienced fast economic growth, but the growth has been slowing down already during the past couples of years. The size of its economy is small compared to Russia, which means the transported tonnes cannot be very massive. However, relatively large amounts of the Russian petroleum exports have been transported through the Estonian ports. The future of the Russian transit traffic in Estonia looks nevertheless uncertain and it remains to be seen how it will develop and if Estonia is able to find replacing cargoes if the Russian transit traffic will come to an end in the Estonian ports. Estonia’s own import and export consists of forestry products, metals or other raw materials and consumer goods. Estonia has many ports on the shores of the Gulf of Finland, but the port of Tallinn dominates the cargo volumes. In 2007, 263 M tonnes of cargoes were transported in the maritime traffic in the Gulf of Finland, of which the share of petroleum products was 56 %. 23 % of the cargoes were loaded or unloaded in the Finnish ports, 60 % in the Russian ports and 17 % in the Estonian ports. The largest ports were Primorsk (74.2 M tonnes) St. Petersburg (59.5 M tonnes), Tallinn (35.9 M tonnes), Sköldvik (19.8 M tonnes), Vysotsk (16.5 M tonnes) and Helsinki (13.4 M) tonnes. Approximately 53 600 ship calls were made in the ports of the Gulf of Finland. The densest traffic was found in the ports of St. Petersburg (14 651 ship calls), Helsinki (11 727 ship calls) and Tallinn (10 614 ship calls) in 2007. The transportation scenarios are usually based on the assumption that the amount of transports follows the development of the economy, although also other factors influence the development of transportation, e.g. government policy, environmental aspects, and social and behavioural trends. The relationship between the development of transportation and the economy is usually analyzed in terms of the development of GDP and trade. When the GDP grows to a certain level, especially the international transports increase because countries of high GDP produce, consume and thus transport more. An effective transportation system is also a precondition for the economic development. In this study, the following factors were taken into consideration when formulating the future scenarios: maritime transportation in the Gulf of Finland 2007, economic development, development of key industries, development of infrastructure and environmental aspects in relation to maritime transportation. The basic starting points for the three alternative scenarios were: • the slow growth scenario: economic recession • the average growth scenario: economy will recover quickly from current instability • the strong growth scenario: the most optimistic views on development will realize According to the slow growth scenario, the total tonnes for the maritime transportation in the Gulf of Finland would be 322.4 M tonnes in 2015, which would mean a growth of 23 % compared to 2007. In the average growth scenario, the total tonnes were estimated to be 431.6 M tonnes – a growth of 64 %, and in the strong growth scenario 507.2 M tonnes – a growth of 93%. These tonnes were further divided into petroleum products and other cargoes by country, into export, import and domestic traffic by country, and between the ports. For petroleum products, the share of crude oil and oil products was estimated and the number of tanker calls in 2015 was calculated for each scenario. However, the future development of maritime transportation in the GoF is dependent on so many societal and economic variables that it is not realistic to predict one exact point estimate value for the cargo tonnes for a certain scenario. Plenty of uncertainty is related both to the degree in which the scenario will come true as well as to the cause-effect relations between the different variables. For these reasons, probability distributions for each scenario were formulated by an expert group. As a result, a range for the total tonnes of each scenario was formulated and they are as follows: the slow growth scenario: 280.8 – 363 M tonnes (expectation value 322.4 M tonnes)