Ankle-brachial index, high-sensitivity C-reactive protein and endothelial function in a cardiovascular risk population

Atherosclerotic vascular disease is the leading cause of death in the Western world. Its main three manifestations are coronary heart disease, cerebrovascular disease, and peripheral arterial disease. Asymptomatic peripheral arterial disease is usually diagnosed using the ankle brachial index, and values ≤ 0.90 are used to determine the diagnosis. The classical risk factors of peripheral arterial disease, such as smoking and diabetes, are well known and early interventions are mandatory to improve the prognosis. What is not well known is the role of inflammation as a risk factor. Yet, a novel approach to cardiovascular diseases is the measurement of endothelial function. In this thesis, we studied the ankle-brachial index, C-reactive protein and endothelial function in a cardiovascular risk population. A total of 2856 subjects were invited to the study and 2085 (73%) responded. From these subjects, a cohort of 1756 risk persons was screened. We excluded the subjects with previously known cardiovascular disease or diabetes, because they were already under systematic follow-up. Out of the study subjects, 983 (56%) were women and 773 (44%) men. The ankle brachial index and high-sensitivity C-reactive protein were measured from 1047 subjects. Endothelial function was assessed by measuring reactive hyperemia pulse amplitude tonometry from 66 subjects with borderline peripheral arterial disease. In this study, smoking was a crucial risk factor for peripheral arterial disease. Subclinical peripheral arterial disease seems to be more common in hypertensive patients even without comorbidities. The measurement of the ankle brachial index is an efficient method to identify patients at an increased cardiovascular risk. High-sensitivity C-reactive protein did not correlate with the ankle brachial index or peripheral arterial disease. Instead, it correlated with measures of obesity. In a cardiovascular risk population with borderline peripheral arterial disease, nearly every fourth subject had endothelial dysfunction. This might point out a subgroup of individuals in need of more intensive treatment for their risk factors.

Lymph node transfer in the treatment of postmastectomy lymphedema

Background: Lymphedema is a debilitating disorder with few treatment options. Clinical studies have shown that microvascular lymph node transfer may improve the lymphatic function of the affected limb. This study provides information about the clinical efficacy and safety of this procedure. Further, the biological background of this technique is clarified with an analysis of postoperative production of lymphatic growth factors and cytokines related to lymphangiogenesis. Patients and Methods: The effect of lymph node transfer to recipient and donor sites was analyzed with lymphoscintigraphy, limb circumference measurements, and appearance of clinical symptoms. Axillary seroma samples were analyzed from four patient groups: Axillary lymph node removal (ALND), Microvascular breast reconstruction (BR), lymph node transfer (LN) and combined lymph node transfer and breast reconstruction (LN-BR). Results: The postoperative lymphatic transport index was improved in 7/19 patients. Ten patients were able to reduce or discontinue compression therapy 6 - 24 months postoperatively. The donor lower limb lymphatic flow was slightly impaired (Ti >10) in 2 patients. No donor site lymphedema symptoms appeared during the 8 – 56-month follow-up. A high concentration of the VEGF-C protein was detected in the seroma fluid of all flap transfer groups. The concentration of the anti-inflammatory and anti-fibrotic cytokine IL-10 was increased in the LN-BR group samples when compared to the ALND or BR group. Conclusions: According to this preliminary study, the lymph node transfer seems to be beneficial for the lymphedema patients. However, a randomized study comparing the effect of BR and LN-BR is needed to evaluate the clinical efficacy of lymph node transfer. In addition, the effect of this surgery on the donor site needs to be studied further. The clinical effects of the lymph node transfer might be partly mediated by increased production of the lymphangiogenic growth factor (VEGF-C) as well as the anti-fibrotic cytokine (IL-10).