La explotación de las artes en la promoción de la Marca Finlandia: análisis crítico del discurso multimodal

En este trabajo de fin de máster se investiga qué impacto tuvo la Marca Finlandia en el uso de las artes finlandesas en Focus – economía y tecnología, una revista publicada por el Ministerio de Asuntos Exteriores de Finlandia durante los años más profundos de la crisis económica 2008-2013. En 2008 el Ministro de Asuntos Exteriores de entonces, Alexander Stubb, designó una delegación para desarrollar la marca país de Finlandia, fruto de un proceso del que se presentó en 2010 un documento llamado Tehtävä Suomelle! (¡Misión para Finlandia!), cuyo objetivo fue concretar el diseño y las funciones de la Marca Finlandia. Este trabajo se enfoca en la utilización del arte y de artistas finlandeses en el material creado para apoyar la promoción de la imagen del país y, en última instancia, su competividad económica. Para tener en cuenta el contexto del material objeto de estudio, presentamos el concepto de la marca país y distintos planteamientos teóricos para su realización. Siendo una estrategia estatal polémica, recorremos los puntos de crítica más importantes sobre esta práctica promocional. También nos familiarizamos con la historia de la promoción nacional antes de introducir el presente proyecto, la Marca Finlandia, y sus objetivos. En la parte teórica se presentan los conceptos relevantes para el estudio: el discurso y su análisis crítico, enfatizando su capacidad ideológica para mantener y crear relaciones del poder muy a menudo desiguales. Ya que nuestro material de estudio empírico está compuesto de publicaciones físicas con dimensiones textuales, visuales y hápticas, nuestro método de investigación es observar críticamente estas relaciones desde la perspectiva multimodal. En la parte empírica del trabajo analizamos la composición de la comunicación multimodal del material imprimido, producido por el Ministerio de Asuntos Exteriores de Finlandia y sus socios de cooperación. Las revistas anuales Focus– Economía y tecnología se enfocan en noticias y artículos sobre los sectores de la economía y tecnología, pero también incluyen contenido sobre el diseño, la música, la moda, la arquitectura y la danza finlandeses. En nuestro análisis recorremos los campos verbales y visuales utilizados en las revistas para investigar de qué manera se presentaban las artes finlandesas en la operación de Marca Finlandia. Detectamos representaciones textuales, resaltaciones visuales y la combinación de ambos, lo que servía a las metas preterminadas y la imagen requerida por la delegación diseñadora de la marca país. Las revistas compartían el discurso en común que corría paralelo con los objetivos de la Marca Finlandia, que a su vez se puede ver como parte del discurso hegemónico neoliberal en general.

This Is a Gorgeous-looking Movie”: Multimodal Interplay between Commentary and Subject Materials in Movie Review Entertainment

The present thesis is a study of movie review entertainment (MRE) which is a contemporary Internet-based genre of texts. MRE are movie reviews in video form which are published online, usually as episodes of an MRE web show. Characteristic to MRE is combining humor and honest opinions in varying degrees as well as the use of subject materials, i.e. clips of the movies, as a part of the review. The study approached MRE from a linguistic perspective aiming to discover 1) whether MRE is primarily text- or image-based and what the primary functions of the modes are, 2) how a reviewer linguistically combines subject footage to her/his commentary?, 3) whether there is any internal variation in MRE regarding the aforementioned questions, and 4) how suitable the selected models and theories are in the analysis of this type of contemporary multimodal data. To answer the aforementioned questions, the multimodal system of image—text relations by Martinec and Salway (2005) in combination with categories of cohesion by Halliday and Hasan (1976) were applied to four full MRE videos which were transcribed in their entirety for the study. The primary data represent varying types of MRE: a current movie review, an analytic essay, a riff review, and a humorous essay. The results demonstrated that image vs. text prioritization can vary between reviews and also within a review. The current movie review and the two essays were primarily commentary-focused whereas the riff review was significantly more dependent on the use of imagery as the clips are a major source of humor which is a prominent value in that type of a review. In addition to humor, clips are used to exemplify the commentary. A reviewer also relates new information to the imagery as well as uses two modes to present the information in a review. Linguistically, the most frequent case was that the reviewer names participants and processes lexically in the commentary. Grammatical relations (reference items such as pronouns and adverbs and conjunctive items in the riff review) were also encountered. There was internal variation to a considerable degree. The methods chosen were deemed appropriate to answer the research questions. Further study could go beyond linguistics to include, for instance, genre and media studies.

Litteracitet i fem högstadieungdomars en-till-en-datorpraktiker

The study focuses on five lower secondary school pupils’ daily use of their one-toone computers, the overall aim being to investigate literacy in this form of computing. Theoretically, the study is rooted in the New Literacy tradition with an ecological perspective, in combination with socio-semiotic theory in a multimodal perspective. New Literacy in the ecological perspective focuses on literacy practices and place/space and on the links between them. Literacy is viewed as socially based, in specific situations and in recurring social practices. Socio-semiotic theory embodying the multimodal perspective is used for the text analysis. The methodology is known as socio-semiotic ethnography. The ethnographic methods encompass just over two years of fieldwork with participating observations of the five participants’ computing activities at home, at school and elsewhere. The participants, one boy and two girls from the Blue (Anemone) School and two girls from the White (Anemone) School, were chosen to reflect a broad spectrum in terms of sociocultural and socioeconomic background. The study shows the existence of a both broad and deep variation in the way digital literacy features in the participants’ one-to-one computing. These variations are associated with experience in relation to the home, the living environment, place, personal qualities and school. The more varied computer usage of the Blue School participants is connected with the interests they developed in their homes and living environments and in the computing practices undertaken in school. Their more varied usage of the computer is reflected in their broader digital literacy repertoires and their greater number and variety of digital literacy abilities. The Blue School participants’ text production is more multifaceted, covers a wider range of subjects and displays a broader palette of semiotic resources. It also combines more text types and the texts are generally longer than those of the White School participants. The Blue School girls have developed a text culture that is close to that of the school. In their case, there is clear linkage between school-initiated and self-initiated computing activities, while other participants do not have the same opportunities to link and integrate self-initiated computing activities into the school context. It also becomes clear that the Blue School girls can relate and adapt their texts to different communicative practices and recipients. In addition, the study shows that the Blue School girls have some degree of scope in their school practice as a result of incorporating into it certain communicative practices that they have developed in nonschool contexts. Quite contrary to the hopes expressed that one-to-one computing would reduce digital inequality, it has increased between these participants. Whether the same or similar results apply in a larger perspective, on a more structural level, is a question that this study cannot answer. It can only draw attention to the need to investigate the matter. The study shows in a variety of ways that the White School participants do not have the same opportunity to develop their digital literacy as the Blue School participants. In an equivalence perspective, schools have a compensational task to perform. It is abundantly clear from the study that investing in one-to-one projects is not enough to combat digital inequality and achieve the digitisation goals established for school education. Alongside their investments in technology, schools need to develop a didactic that legitimises and compensates for the different circumstances of different pupils. The compensational role of schools in this connection is important not only for the present participants but also for the community at large, in that it can help to secure a cohesive, open and democratic society.