Modularity in Health and Social Services: Perspectives on Organization and Management

Organizations that provide health and social services operate in a complex and constantly changing environment. Changes occur, for example, in ageing, technology and biotechnology, and customers’ expectations, as well as the global economic situation. Organizations typically aim to adapt the changes by introducing new organizational structures and managerial practices, such as process and lean management. Only recently has there been an interest in evaluating whether organizations providing health and social services could apply modularity in order to respond to some of the changes. The concept of modularity originates from manufacturing, but is applied in many other disciplines, such as information technology and logistics. However, thus far, the literature concerning modularity in health and social services is scarce. Therefore the purpose of this thesis is to increase understanding concerning modularity and the possibilities to apply modularity in the health and social services context. In addition, the purpose is to shed light on the viewpoints that are worth taking into account when considering the application of modularity in the health and social services context. The aim of the thesis is to analyze the way in which the modular structures are applied in the health and social services context and to analyze what advantages and possible barriers, as well as managerial concerns, might occur if modularity is applied in the health and social services context. The thesis is conducted by using multiple methods in order to provide a broad aspect to the topic. A systematic literature review provided solid ground for pre-understanding the topic and supported the formulation of the research questions. Theoretical reasoning provided a general overview of the special characteristics of the health and social services context and their effect on application of modularity. Empirical studies concentrated on managerial concerns of modularity particularly from the perspective of health and social services for the elderly. Results of the thesis reveal that structures in products, services, processes, and organizations are rather modular in health and social services. They can be decomposed in small independent units, while the challenges seem to occur especially in the compatibility of the services. It seems that health and social services managers have recognized this problem and they are increasingly paying attention to this challenge in order to enhance the flexible compatibility of services. Advantages and possible barriers of modularity are explored in this thesis, and from the theoretical perspective it could be argued that modularity seems to be beneficial in the context of health and social services. In fact, it has the potential to alleviate several of the challenges that the health and social services context is confronting. For example, modular structures could support organizations in their challenging task to respond to customers’ increasing demand for heterogeneous services. However, special characteristics of the health and social services context create barriers and provide significant challenges in application of modularity. For example, asymmetry of information, negative externalities, uncertainty of demand, and rigid regulation prevent managers from extensively drawing benefits from modularity. Results also reveal that modularity has managerial implications in health and social service. Modularity has the potential to promote and support new service development and outsourcing. Results also provide insights into network management and increases managerial understanding of different network management strategies. Standardization in health and social services is extensive due to legislation and recommendations. Modularity provides alternative paths to take an advantage of standardization while still ensuring the quality of the services. Based on this thesis, it can be concluded, both from a theoretical perspective and from empirical results concerning modularity in health and social services, that modularity might fit well and be beneficial. However, the special characteristics of the health and social services context prevent some of the benefits of modularity and complicate its application. This thesis contributes to the academic literature on the organization and management of health and social services by describing modularity as an alternative way for organizing and managing health and social services. In addition, it contributes to the literature of modularity by exploring the applicability of modularity in the context of health and social services. It also provides practical contribution to health and social services managers by evaluating the pros and cons of modularity when applied to health and social services.

Luottamuksen lähteet. Vertaileva tutkimus yleistynyttä luottamusta synnyttävistä mekanismeista

Tutkimuksen aiheena on yleistynyt luottamus. Väitöskirjassa tutkitaan mistä tuntemattomien kansalaisten toisiinsa kohdistama luottamus kumpuaa ja haetaan vastauksia tähän kysymykseen sekä maakohtaisen että vertailevan tutkimuksen avulla. Tutkimus koostuu yhteenvedon lisäksi viidestä tutkimusartikkelista, joissa luottamuksen syntyä tarkastellaan sekä yksilöiden mikrotason vuorovaikutuksen että maiden välisten eroavaisuuksien näkökulmasta. Yleistyneen luottamuksen synnystä on esitetty useita eri teorioita. Tässä tutkimuksessa tarkastellaan näistä kahta keskeisintä. Osa tutkijoista korostaa kansalaisyhteiskunnan ja ruohonjuuritason verkostojen roolia yleistyneen luottamuksen synnyn taustalla. Tämän hypoteesin mukaan kansalaiset, jotka viettävät aikaansa yhdistyksissä tai muissa sosiaalisissa verkostoissa, oppivat muita helpommin luottamaan paitsi täysin tuntemattomiin ihmisiin myös yhteiskunnallisiin instituutioihin (kansalaisyhteiskuntakeskeinen hypoteesi). Toiset taas painottavat yhteiskunnan julkisten instituutioiden merkitystä. Tämä hypoteesi korostaa instituutioiden reiluutta ja oikeudenmukaisuutta (instituutiokeskeinen hypoteesi). Ihmiset pystyvät luottamaan toisiinsa ja ratkaisemaan kollektiivisia ongelmiaan yhdessä silloin kun esimerkiksi poliittiset ja lainsäädännölliset instituutiot pystyvät luomaan tähän tarvittavan toimintaympäristön. Aineistoina käytetään kansallisia (Hyvinvointi- ja palvelut) sekä kansainvälisiä vertailevia kyselytutkimuksia (European Social Survey ja ISSP). Yksilö- ja makrotason analyyseja yhdistämällä selvitetään yleistynyttä luottamusta selittäviä tekijöitä sekä mekanismeja joiden kautta yleistynyt luottamus muodostuu. Väitöskirjan tulokset tukevat suurimmaksi osaksi instituutiokeskeiseen suuntaukseen sisältyviä hypoteeseja yleistyneen luottamuksen kasautumisesta. Kuitenkin myös esimerkiksi yhdistystoiminnalla havaittiin olevan joitakin yhdistysjäsenien ulkopuolelle ulottuvia myönteisiä vaikutuksia kansalaisten luottamukseen, mikä taas tukee kansalaisyhteiskuntakeskeistä hypoteesia. Tutkimuksen keskeinen tulos on, että kaiken kaikkiaan luottamus näyttäisi kukoistavan maissa, joissa kansalaiset kokevat julkiset instituutiot oikeudenmukaisina sekä reiluina, kansalaisyhteiskunnan roolin luottamuksen synnyttämisessä ollessa tälle alisteinen. Syyksi tähän on oletettu, että näissä maissa (erityisesti pohjoismaiset hyvinvointivaltiot) harjoitettu universaali hyvinvointipolitiikka ja palvelut ovat keskeisiä korkeaa yleistynyttä luottamusta selittäviä tekijöitä. Toisaalta maavertailuissa tätä yhteyttä on selitetty myös sillä, että näissä yhteiskunnassa ei ole paikannettavissa selkeää kulttuurisesti erottuvaa alaluokkaa. Tämän tutkimuksen tulokset tukevat enemmän universaalin hyvinvointivaltion oikeudenmukaisuuteen liittyviä ominaisuuksia alaluokkaistumishypoteesin sijaan. Toisaalta mikrotasolla tarkasteltuna yleistyneen luottamuksen ja hyvinvointipalvelujen välinen yhteys liittyy enemmän palveluiden riittävyyteen kuin niiden universaalisuuden asteeseen. Niin ikään maavertailuissa esimerkiksi verotuksen oikeudenmukaisena kokeminen näyttäisi olevan palvelujen saatavuutta tai niihin liittyviä oikeudenmukaisuuden kokemuksia tärkeämpi seikka yleistyneen luottamuksen kannalta.

Opportunities, constraints and constrained opportunities – A study on mothers’ working time patterns in 22 European countries

The aim of this study was to analyse mothers’ working time patterns across 22 European countries. The focus was on three questions: how much mothers prefer to work, how much they actually work, and to what degree their preferred and actual working times are (in)consistent with each other. The focus was on cross-national differences in mothers’ working time patterns, comparison of mothers’ working times to that of childless women and fathers, as well as on individual- and country-level factors that explain the variation between them. In the theoretical background, the departure point was an integrative theoretical approach where the assumption is that there are various kinds of explanations for the differences in mothers’ working time patterns – namely structural, cultural and institutional – , and that these factors are laid in two levels: individual- and country-levels. Data were extracted from the European Social Survey (ESS) 2010 / 2011. The results showed that mothers’ working time patterns, both preferred and actual working times, varied across European countries. Four clusters were formed to illustrate the differences. In the full-time pattern, full-time work was the most important form of work, leaving all other working time forms marginal. The full-time pattern was perceived in terms of preferred working times in Bulgaria and Portugal. In polarised pattern countries, fulltime work was also important, but it was accompanied by a large share of mothers not working at all. In the case of preferred working times, many Eastern and Southern European countries followed it whereas in terms of actual working times it included all Eastern and Southern European countries as well as Finland. The combination pattern was characterised by the importance of long part-time hours and full-time work. It was the preferred working time pattern in the Nordic countries, France, Slovenia, and Spain, but Belgium, Denmark, France, Norway, and Sweden followed it in terms of actual working times. The fourth cluster that described mothers’ working times was called the part-time pattern, and it was illustrated by the prevalence of short and long part-time work. In the case of preferred working times, it was followed in Belgium, Germany, Ireland, the Netherlands and Switzerland. Besides Belgium, the part-time pattern was followed in the same countries in terms of actual working times. The consistency between preferred and actual working times was rather strong in a majority of countries. However, six countries fell under different working time patterns when preferred and actual working times were compared. Comparison of working mothers’, childless women’s, and fathers’ working times showed that differences between these groups were surprisingly small. It was only in part-time pattern countries that working mothers worked significantly shorter hours than working childless women and fathers. Results therefore revealed that when mothers’ working times are under study, an important question regarding the population examined is whether it consists of all mothers or only working mothers. Results moreover supported the use of the integrative theoretical approach when studying mothers’ working time patterns. Results indicate that mothers’ working time patterns in all countries are shaped by various opportunities and constraints, which are comprised of structural, cultural, institutional, and individual-level factors.