Competence in intensive and critical care nursing - development of a basic assessment scale for graduating nursing students

Intensive and critical care nursing is a speciality in its own right and with its own nature within the nursing profession. This speciality poses its own demands for nursing competencies. Intensive and critical care nursing is focused on severely ill patients and their significant others. The patients are comprehensively cared for, constantly monitored and their vital functions are sustained artificially. The main goal is to win time to cure the cause of the patient’s situation or illness. The purpose of this empirical study was i) to describe and define competence and competence requirements in intensive and critical care nursing, ii) to develop a basic measurement scale for competence assessment in intensive and critical care nursing for graduating nursing students, and iii) to describe and evaluate graduating nursing students’ basic competence in intensive and critical care nursing by seeking the reference basis of self-evaluated basic competence in intensive and critical care nursing from ICU nurses. However, the main focus of this study was on the outcomes of nursing education in this nursing speciality. The study was carried out in different phases: basic exploration of competence (phase 1 and 2), instrumentation of competence (phase 3) and evaluation of competence (phase 4). Phase 1 (n=130) evaluated graduating nursing students’ basic biological and physiological knowledge and skills for working in intensive and critical care with Basic Knowledge Assessment Tool version 5 (BKAT-5, Toth 2012). Phase 2 focused on defining competence in intensive and critical care nursing with the help of literature review (n=45 empirical studies) as well as competence requirements in intensive and critical care nursing with the help of experts (n=45 experts) in a Delphi study. In phase 3 the scale Intensive and Critical Care Nursing Competence Scale (ICCN-CS) was developed and tested twice (pilot test 1: n=18 students and n=12 nurses; pilot test 2: n=56 students and n=54 nurses). Finally, in phase 4, graduating nursing students’ competence was evaluated with ICCN-CS and BKAT version 7 (Toth 2012). In order to develop a valid assessment scale of competence for graduating nursing students and to evaluate and establish the competence of graduating nursing students, empirical data were retrieved at the same time from both graduating nursing students (n=139) and ICU nurses (n=431). Competence can be divided into clinical and general professional competence. It can be defined as a specific knowledge base, skill base, attitude and value base and experience base of nursing and the personal base of an intensive and critical care nurse. Personal base was excluded in this self-evaluation based scale. The ICCN-CS-1 consists of 144 items (6 sum variables). Finally, it became evident that the experience base of competence is not a suitable sum variable in holistic intensive and critical care competence scale for graduating nursing students because of their minor experience in this special nursing area. ICCN-CS-1 is a reliable and tolerably valid scale for use among graduating nursing students and ICU nurses Among students, basic competence of intensive and critical care nursing was self-rated as good by 69%, as excellent by 25% and as moderate by 6%. However, graduating nursing students’ basic biological and physiological knowledge and skills for working in intensive and critical care were poor. The students rated their clinical and professional competence as good, and their knowledge base and skill base as moderate. They gave slightly higher ratings for their knowledge base than skill base. Differences in basic competence emerged between graduating nursing students and ICU nurses. The students’ self-ratings of both their basic competence and clinical and professional competence were significantly lower than the nurses’ ratings. The students’ self-ratings of their knowledge and skill base were also statistically significantly lower than nurses’ ratings. However, both groups reported the same attitude and value base, which was excellent. The strongest factor explaining students’ conception of their competence was their experience of autonomy in nursing. Conclusions: Competence in intensive and critical care nursing is a multidimensional concept. Basic competence in intensive and critical care nursing can be measured with self-evaluation based scale but alongside should be used an objective evaluation method. Graduating nursing students’ basic competence in intensive and critical care nursing is good but their knowledge and skill base are moderate. Especially the biological and physiological knowledge base is poor. Therefore in future in intensive and critical care nursing education should be focused on both strengthening students’ biological and physiological knowledge base and on strengthening their overall skill base. Practical implications are presented for nursing education, practice and administration. In future, research should focus on education methods and contents, mentoring of clinical practice and orientation programmes as well as further development of the scale.

Asleep or not asleep? Evaluation of the Quality of Patients’ Sleep in Critical Care Nursing

Sleep is important for the recovery of a critically ill patient, as lack of sleep is known to influence negatively a person’s cardiovascular system, mood, orientation, and metabolic and immune function and thus, it may prolong patients’ intensive care unit (ICU) and hospital stay. Intubated and mechanically ventilated patients suffer from fragmented and light sleep. However, it is not known well how non-intubated patients sleep. The evaluation of the patients’ sleep may be compromised by their fatigue and still position with no indication if they are asleep or not. The purpose of this study was to evaluate ICU patients’ sleep evaluation methods, the quality of non-intubated patients’ sleep, and the sleep evaluations performed by ICU nurses. The aims were to develop recommendations of patients’ sleep evaluation for ICU nurses and to provide a description of the quality of non-intubated patients’ sleep. The literature review of ICU patients’ sleep evaluation methods was extended to the end of 2014. The evaluation of the quality of patients’ sleep was conducted with four data: A) the nurses’ narrative documentations of the quality of patients’ sleep (n=114), B) the nurses’ sleep evaluations (n=21) with a structured observation instrument C) the patients’ self-evaluations (n=114) with the Richards-Campbell Sleep Questionnaire, and D) polysomnographic evaluations of the quality of patients’ sleep (n=21). The correspondence of data A with data C (collected 4–8/2011), and data B with data D (collected 5–8/2009) were analysed. Content analysis was used for the nurses’ documentations and statistical analyses for all the other data. The quality of non-intubated patients’ sleep varied between individuals. In many patients, sleep was light, awakenings were frequent, and the amount of sleep was insufficient as compared to sleep in healthy people. However, some patients were able to sleep well. The patients evaluated the quality of their sleep on average neither high nor low. Sleep depth was evaluated to be the worst and the speed of falling asleep the best aspect of sleep, on a scale 0 (poor sleep) to 100 (good sleep). Nursing care was mostly performed while the patients were awake, and thus the disturbing effect was low. The instruments available for nurses to evaluate the quality of patients’ sleep were limited and measured mainly the quantity of sleep. Nurses’ structured observatory evaluations of the quality of patients’ sleep were correct for approximately two thirds of the cases, and only regarding total sleep time. Nurses’ narrative documentations of the patients’ sleep corresponded with patients’ self-evaluations in just over half of the cases. However, nurses documented several dimensions of sleep that are not included in the present sleep evaluation instruments. They could be classified according to the components of the nursing process: needs assessment, sleep assessment, intervention, and effect of intervention. Valid, more comprehensive sleep evaluation methods for nurses are needed to evaluate, document, improve and study patients’ quality of sleep.

TEHOHOITAJIEN KIVUN ARVIOINNIN OSAAMINEN – Tehohoitopotilaille kehitetyn kivunarviointimittarin käytön oppiminen video-opetuksen avulla.

Tehohoitopotilaan kivun arvioiminen on usein haastavaa, johtuen potilaan kyvyttömyydestä kommunikoida. Kivun arvioinnin avuksi onkin tästä syystä kehitetty käyttäytymiseen perustuvia kipumittareita. Tehohoitajilla on keskeinen asema kivun arvioinnissa, mutta tutkimusten perusteella tehohoitajien kivun arvioinnin osaaminen on puutteellista niin tietojen kuin taitojen osalta ja heillä on ennakkoasenteita kivun arviointiin liittyen. Tehohoitajien kouluttaminen kivun arviointiin liittyen on tärkeä keino tehohoitopotilaan kivun arvioinnin edistämisessä. Koulutuksen tulee kuitenkin olla helposti saatavilla, ottaen huomioon hoitotodellisuuden siihen tuomat haasteet. Tutkimuksen tarkoituksena oli arvioida video-opetuksen vaikutusta tehohoitajien tietoihin ja taitoihin tehohoitopotilaalle kehitetyn Critical-Care Pain Observation Tool (CPOT)-kipumittarin käyttöön liittyen, sekä kuvailla tehohoitajien kokemuksia video-opetuksesta oppimismenetelmänä. Yhdeltä teho-osastolta 48 tehohoitajaa katsoi tutkimusta varten kehitetyn CPOT-opetusvideon, jonka jälkeen he arvioivat kahden potilaan kipua CPOT-kipumittarilla, tutkijan tehdessä samanaikaisesti rinnakkaisarvioinnit potilaista. Arviointien jälkeen tehohoitajat tekivät tietotestin ja täyttivät CPOT-arviointilomakkeen. Tehohoitajien CPOT-kipumittarin käyttötaitoja arvioitiin tarkastelemalla tehohoitajien ja tutkijan tekemien kivunarviointien yhdenmukaisuutta interrater reliabiliteettilaskelmin. Kaksikymmentä tehohoitajaa haastateltiin heidän kokemuksista oppimismenetelmään liittyen. Haastattelut analysoitiin deduktiivisella temaattisella analyysillä. Tehohoitajat oppivat CPOT-kipumittarin käytön periaatteet ja kokivat oppineensa mittarin käytön, mutta interrater reliabiliteetti suhteessa tutkijan tekemiin kivun arviointeihin oli keskinkertainen. Video-opetus koettiin positiivisena, vaikkakin vuorovaikutuksellisuutta kaivattiin. Tutkimus osoitti video-opetuksen olevan käyttökelpoinen oppimismenetelmä CPOT-kipumittarin käytön periaatteiden oppimiseen, mutta parempien käyttötaitojen saavuttaminen vaatii lisäharjoittelua. Koska tehohoitajien subjektiivinen arvio käyttötaidoista ei välttämättä vastaa todellisia käyttötaitoja, oleellista olisi varmistaa myös objektiivisesti mittarin käyttötaidot koulutuksen jälkeen. Jatkossa tulisi tutkia käytäntöön soveltuvia keinoja varmistaa mittarin käyttötaidot, sekä teho-osastojen oppimiskulttuuria ja tehohoitajien motivaatiota ja asenteita työhön liittyvään oppimiseen.