Empirical errors of small area estimates from the multisource National Forest Inventory in Eastern Finland

Abstract

Models in country scale carbon accounting of forest soils

Selective papers of the workshop on "Development of models and forest soil surveys for monitoring of soil carbon", Koli, Finland, April 5-9 2006.

Projektisalkkunäkymät teknologiaohjelman päätöksenteon tukena

Tämän diplomityön tavoitteena on kuvata Teknologian kehittämiskeskuksen (Tekes) teknologiaohjelmien päätöksentekoa sekä kehittää teknologiaohjelman päätöksentekoa tukevia tiedon esittämistapoja eli projektisalkkunäkymiä. Työssä käytettiin laadullista tutkimusotetta. Työn toteuttamisessa noudatettiin osallistuvan havainnoinnin toiminta-tutkimuksen periaatteita. Siinä tutkija itse osallistuu havaitun tutkimusongelman ratkaisuun yhdessä tutkimuskohteensa kanssa. Tämän työn empiirinen aineisto kerättiin vuoden 2002 ja 2003 aikana toteutetun teknologiaohjelman ohjaustyökalun pilotointiprojektin yhteydessä. Pilotointiprojektin aikana tehdyt havainnot ja kehittämistyön kuvaus ja tulokset on koottu työn empiriassa esiteltyihin analyyseihin, johtopäätöksiin sekä jatkotoimenpide-ehdotuksiin. Työn tutkimustuloksina voidaan esittää, että teknologiaohjelman päätöksenteko perustuu ohjelman nykytilaan, tulevaisuuteen, projektien hyödyntämispotentiaaliin, haastavuuteen sekä verkottumiseen liittyvien tietojen tarkasteluun. Päätöksenteko jakaantuu ohjelmaorganisaation edustajien johtoryhmän, ohjelmapäällikön ja teknologia-asiantuntijan kesken. Heillä on päätöksentekoon, kommentointiin, esittelyyn sekä tiedoksisaantiin liittyviä rooleja. Nykyisin teknologiaohjelmien päätöksentekokäytännöt vaihtelevat ohjelmittain hyvinkin paljon. Päätöksentekoon kaivataan systematiikkaa sekä objektiivisuutta. Pilotointiprojektissa saatujen kokemusten perusteella visualisoidut projektisalkkunäkymät antavat teknologiaohjelmien päätöksenteolle kaivattua tukea. Salkkunäkymien avulla voidaan tarkastella ohjelman nykytilaa, tulevaisuutta, verkottumista, riskejä sekä tuotto-odotuksia. Salkkunäkymien tuottamisen helpottamiseksi tulisi edelleen kehittää projektikohtaisen tiedon keräämistapoja sekä projektisalkun hallinta-prosesseja.

Prosessilähtöinen laadunarviointi ohutlevymekaniikkasopimusvalmistajan näkökulmasta

Diplomityö on tehty Lappeenrannan teknillisessä korkeakoulussa Konepajatekniikan laitoksella. Työ on osa Konepajatekniikan laitoksen toteuttamaa ”LELA” levytuotteiden laadunvalvontaprojektia. Projektiosapuolet olivat: Abloy Oy (Joensuu), Flextronics Enclosures (Oulu), Hihra Oy (Turku), Lillbacka Oy (Alahärmä), Nokia Networks (Oulu), Segerström & Svensson (Uusikaupunki) ja Scanfil Oy (Sievi). Lisäksi projektin pääasiallisena rahoittavana osapuolena toimi Teknologian kehittämiskeskus, Tekes. Työ perustui ohutlevykomponentteja valmistavissa kohdeyrityksissä suoritettuun laadunarviointitutkimukseen, joka sisälsi tuotantoon kohdistetun virhekartoituksen sekä laadunarviointikyselyn. Tutkimuksessa suoritetun tuotannon virhekartoituksen mukaan tyypillisessä ohutlevykomponentteja valmistavassa yrityksessä virheidenesiintymistodennäköisyys on n. 5 – 12 % / tuote. Eniten virheitä syntyi epäkeskopuristintöissä. Tutkimus osoittaa, että virhekartoituksen avulla yrityksen on mahdollista kartoittaa tuotannossa syntyvät virheet ja edelleen kohdistaa laadun kehitystoimenpiteet oikeisiin tuotannon osa-alueisiin.

Proceedings of JAC 2010. Journées Automates Cellulaires

The second Symposium on Cellular Automata “Journ´ees Automates Cellulaires” (JAC 2010) took place in Turku, Finland, on December 15-17, 2010. The first two conference days were held in the Educarium building of the University of Turku, while the talks of the third day were given onboard passenger ferry boats in the beautiful Turku archipelago, along the route Turku–Mariehamn–Turku. The conference was organized by FUNDIM, the Fundamentals of Computing and Discrete Mathematics research center at the mathematics department of the University of Turku. The program of the conference included 17 submitted papers that were selected by the international program committee, based on three peer reviews of each paper. These papers form the core of these proceedings. I want to thank the members of the program committee and the external referees for the excellent work that have done in choosing the papers to be presented in the conference. In addition to the submitted papers, the program of JAC 2010 included four distinguished invited speakers: Michel Coornaert (Universit´e de Strasbourg, France), Bruno Durand (Universit´e de Provence, Marseille, France), Dora Giammarresi (Universit` a di Roma Tor Vergata, Italy) and Martin Kutrib (Universit¨at Gie_en, Germany). I sincerely thank the invited speakers for accepting our invitation to come and give a plenary talk in the conference. The invited talk by Bruno Durand was eventually given by his co-author Alexander Shen, and I thank him for accepting to make the presentation with a short notice. Abstracts or extended abstracts of the invited presentations appear in the first part of this volume. The program also included several informal presentations describing very recent developments and ongoing research projects. I wish to thank all the speakers for their contribution to the success of the symposium. I also would like to thank the sponsors and our collaborators: the Finnish Academy of Science and Letters, the French National Research Agency project EMC (ANR-09-BLAN-0164), Turku Centre for Computer Science, the University of Turku, and Centro Hotel. Finally, I sincerely thank the members of the local organizing committee for making the conference possible. These proceedings are published both in an electronic format and in print. The electronic proceedings are available on the electronic repository HAL, managed by several French research agencies. The printed version is published in the general publications series of TUCS, Turku Centre for Computer Science. We thank both HAL and TUCS for accepting to publish the proceedings.

Metsäsääntely Suomessa ja Venäjällä. Näkökulmia kestävään metsätalouteen

Sustainability is the aim of forest management and forest regulation in many countries. Accordingly, forest management has been steered towards more environmentally friendly methods and new regulatory instruments have been introduced. At the same time, wood trade and forest industry have become a global business. Even if the importance of national forest legislation has not decreased, it has been widely acknowledged that national regulation of forest management is no longer sufficient. The movement of goods does not acknowledge boundaries, even though most negative environmental and social consequences stay in the country of origin of wood and other raw materials. As a partial solution to this dilemma, different kinds of regulations have been developed. Various forest certification schemes and wood trade regulation in the EU (995/2010) are examples of efforts to prevent illegal logging and unsustainable forestry. The Finland-based forest industry is to a varying extent dependent on wood trade from Russia. Especially in the 1990‟s, ethical questions concerning import of wood from Russian old growth forests near the Finnish border were widely discussed. Consequently, forest industry enterprises have developed systems to trace the origin of wood and to buy certified wood from Russia. The aim of the research has been to evaluate Finnish and Russian forest regulations in order to investigate what kind of forest management these regulations enhance, and to what extent ecologically sustainable forest management has been integrated into different forms of regulation. I have examined Finnish and Russian forest regulation in four separate articles based on the topics of the Russian Forest Code, forest certification and other voluntary forest protection measures in Russia, Finnish forest certification and Finnish forest legislation. One objective has been to analyse the roles voluntary forest certification plays in promoting sustainable forest management in different countries. In my research, I have mainly concentrated on ecological sustainability and protection of biodiversity, although other aspects of sustainable forest management have been touched upon in different articles. In the following I shall conclude the findings of my research. When the current Russian Forest Code (2006) was being adopted, the main emphasis was not on ecological issues, but on reorganizing forest governance. The role of ecological requirements was even slightly diminished during the legislative reform. There are, nevertheless, still stipulations aiming at ecological sustainability, such as the division of forests into different forest management categories and various protection zones. In 2000, FSC forest certification arrived in Russia, at present covering already 28 million hectares of forests. The PEFC scheme is now in use as well, but to a much lesser extent. If properly implemented, Russian forest certification schemes clearly improve the level of ecological and social sustainability of forestry in Russia. Certification criteria, however, are partly in conflict with the Russian forest legislation and certified enterprises have been forced to pay fines or to negotiate with forest authorities. This clearly indicates that even if Russian forest legislation has otherwise been liberalized to a certain extent, some significant paternalism still exists. Voluntary, hands-on biodiversity protection measures are not valued, and they are not part of the official protection policies as in many other countries. However, there have been some regional solutions to this dilemma. In the Republic of Karelia forest authorities have approved a set of forest biodiversity protection rules created by a local NGO and a forest industry enterprise. By following these local rules, an enterprise can avoid fines for protection measures. The current Finnish Forest Act was adopted in 1996. It brought forest legislation into a new era as some ecological aspects were integrated into forest legislation. The various soft-law forest management recommendations further increased the level of biodiversity protection. My evaluation of the overall legitimacy of the Finnish forest legislation and forest management paradigm revealed, however, several problematic issues. As part of this study I analysed the history of the current forest management paradigm. This analysis revealed the path dependency which still hinders the protection of biodiversity and clearly decreases the general legitimacy of forest management. Due to several historical reasons only even-structured forest management based on clear cuts has for decades been officially approved in Finland. Due to increasing demands of forest owners the legislation is finally being revised. Yet, the official approval of uneven-structured forest management would not be enough to fully improve ecological, social and cultural legitimacy. The latest ecological theories and knowledge of endangered species should be taken into account in the on-going reform of forest legislation as well as the modernisation. Forest legislation is one of the very few spheres of Finnish environmental legislation where openness and participation are still considered a threat. The first Finnish forest certification scheme, PEFC, was established in 2000. It now covers more than 20 million hectares, about 95% of the forests in Finland. PEFC Finland does not require a higher level of biodiversity protection than the recommendations by Tapio (the Development Centre for Forestry), but certification has unified forest management practices and requires more protection measures than mere forest legislation. The study suggests that in Finland PEFC has not functioned as an instrument which would substantially improve the level of forest management. Rather it has supported the status quo of the forest sector. While the ecological and social responsibility of Finland-based forest corporations was one impetus for this research, I want to conclude that there are problems related to forest legislation and non-state regulation in both Finland and Russia. If an enterprise buying wood from Russia buys only certified wood, and carefully avoids wood coming from high conservation value forests that are either ecologically or socially valuable, it can be claimed to be as sustainably produced as in Finland. However, there must be continuous scrutiny of the circumstances. In Russia, the level of the compliance of certification criteria varies considerably, and there are vast unprotected invaluable forest areas. The utilisation of these areas should not be based on short-sighted decisions or lack of consensus among stakeholders.

Library vs publisher vs archive: managing the UK geospatial record

Presentation at Open Repositories 2014, Helsinki, Finland, June 9-13, 2014