Coopetitive advantage – How firms create and appropriate value by collaborating with their competitors

Collaboration between competing firms (coopetition) has emerged as an important issue forn business practice in many industries. Extant literature has examined coopetition on many levels of analysis, but lacks clarity in distinguishing it explicitly from cooperation between noncompeting organizations. Because of this, the performance implications of coopetition from the perspective of an individual firm are still ambiguous – some research suggests positive results whereas other studies suggest detrimental outcomes. The aim in this dissertation is to narrow these gaps by exploring how firms create and appropriate value through collaboration with their competitors. The dissertation is divided into two parts. The first part comprises an overview of the relevant literature, as well as the conclusions of the whole study, and the second part includes six research publications. Both qualitative and quantitative methodologies are utilized. The results suggest that coopetition embodies the distinctive logic of value creation and appropriation from the perspective of an individual firm, and thus differs in terms of performance implications from cooperation between non-competitors. The distinction comes from the fact that competitors have somewhat similar understanding, capabilities and interest related to certain markets, which is potentially both challenging and beneficial in terms of the individual firm’s competitiveness. It appears from the findings that there are distinctive firm-external and firm-specific factors affecting the success of a coopetition strategy. This study makes three main contributions. First, on the conceptual level it shows the distinction between coopetition and cooperation between non-rivals as a collaborative inter-organizational relationship. Secondly, it sets out a framework and propositions that enhance understanding of how value is created and appropriated in coopetition from the perspective of an individual firm. Thirdly, it offers empirical evidence of how coopetition affects firms’ innovation and market performance, and identifies the focal internal and external factors involved. In general terms, the thesis adds to our knowledge of how a firm can successfully utilize a coopetition strategy in its pursuit of improved performance.

Ecosystem architecture design: endogenous and exogenous structural properties

The aim of this dissertation is to bridge and synthesize the different streams of literature addressing ecosystem architecture through a multiple‐lens perspective. In addition, the structural properties of and processes to design and manage the architecture will be examined. With this approach, the oft‐neglected actor‐structure duality is addressed and both the position and structure, and action and process are under scrutiny. Further, the developed framework and empirical evidence offer valuable insights on how firms collectively create value and individually appropriate value. The dissertation is divided into two parts. The first part comprises a literature review, as well as the conclusions of the whole study, and the second part includes six research publications. The dissertation is based on three different reasoning logics: abduction, induction and deduction; related qualitative and quantitative methodologies are utilized in the empirical examination of the phenomenon in the information and communication technology industry. The results suggest firstly that there are endogenous and exogenous structural properties of the ecosystem architecture. Out of these, the former ones can be more easily influenced by a particular actor whereas the latter ones are taken more or less for granted. Secondly, the exogenous ecosystem design properties influence the value creation potential of the ecosystem whereas the endogenous ecosystem design properties influence the value appropriation potential of a particular actor in the ecosystem. Thirdly, the study suggests that there is a relationship between endogenous and exogenous structural properties in that the endogenous properties can be leveraged to create and reconfigure the exogenous properties whereas the exogenous properties prose opportunities and restrictions on the use of endogenous properties. In addition, the study suggests that there are different emergent and engineered processes to design and manage ecosystem architecture and to influence both the endogenous and exogenous structural properties of ecosystem architecture. This study makes three main contributions. First, on the conceptual level, it brings coherence and direction to the fast growing body of literature on novel inter‐organizational arrangements, such as ecosystems. It does this by bridging and synthetizing three different streams of literature, namely the boundary, design and orchestration conception. Secondly, it sets out a framework that enhances our understanding of the structural properties of ecosystem architecture; of the processes to design and manage ecosystem architecture; and of their influence on the value creation potential of the ecosystem and the value capture potential of a particular firm. Thirdly, it offers empirical evidence of the structural properties and processes.

Becoming a caring nurse : the heart of the matter in nurse education

This thesis in caring science didactics is based on a thinking, where the fundamental basis for the didactic is science-based, i.e. it does not emanate from the nursing profession but brings forward a didactic that grows out of caring science and its core substance and ethos. This view on didactics arises from the caritative theory developed by Eriksson. The overall aim of the study is to clarify the meaning and essence of understanding, as well as to explore and deepen the understanding of student nurses' processes of understanding and becoming with the intention of developing a theory model for caring didactics. The overarching research questions are: What is the essence of understanding (of caring science knowledge)? What are the possibilities and importance of understanding in the appropriation of caring science? What characterizes and impels the process of becoming? The thesis consists of four sub studies and a summary section. The overall methodological approach is hermeneutic involving quantitative as well as qualitative methods. The data for the study has been collected through a longitudinal research project that followed student nurses at three universities during their entire education. The empirical sub studies form the basis for the interpreted knowledge that is formulated in the new understanding. This new understanding have, through additional theory-charging with the theory fragments from Gadamer, generated the heuristic synthesis which is illustrated in the theory model. The findings shows that understanding can be described as something unlimited, as an endless movement, which can be illustrated as a lying eighth, a lemniscate. The lemiscate of understanding is characterized by seeing, knowing and becoming and consists of seven differently named phases; the acquired horizon of understanding, the encounter of horizons, the dialogue of horizons, the fusion of horizons, application, reflection and shaping a new horizon of understanding. Bildung (formation), is the ultimate imprint of the endless spiral movement of understanding. Ethos and arête constitute the hubs around which the lemniscate of understanding circles. These include the spirit and driving force that the student carries within. The caring culture encloses the lemniscate of understanding. The caring culture provides the life space of understanding and the prevailing basic values are evinced in the culture.

Tulosohjauksen kehittämiskohteet Rikosseuraamuslaitoksella

Diplomityön tavoitteena on Rikosseuraamuslaitoksen tulosohjauksen kuvaaminen, mää-rittely, arviointi ja kehitysehdotusten tekeminen. Lisäksi määritellään normi- ja informaa-tio-ohjaus sekä tarkastellaan kuinka ne näkyvät tulosohjauksessa. Informaatio-ohjauksesta tuodaan esille keskeisimpiä kehityskohteita. Toiminnan tehostamistarpeet johtuvat yleisestä taloustilanteesta ja sitä seuraavasta määrärahojen pienenemisestä. Aluksi pidettiin puolistrukturoidut haastattelut, joiden perusteella kuvattiin laitoksen pro-sessikartta. Tämän jälkeen tulos- ja normiohjauksesta tehtiin eritasoisia prosessikuvauk-sia. Kuvauksilla rajattiin ja selvennettiin tarkasteltavia prosesseja. Kirjallisuuden, tutki-musten ja selvitysten avulla kartoitettiin tulosohjauksen yleisiä kehityskohteita. Niitä ver-rattiin haastattelutietoihin, arvioitiin tulosohjauksen nykytilaa ja tehtiin kehitysehdotuksia. Tulosohjauksesta löytyi useita kehityskohteita. Strategisen toimenpidesuunnitelman edis-tymiseen tulisi tehdä raportointiaikataulu. Tulostavoitteita voisi valmistella enemmän työntekijälähtöisesti ja yksiköille tulisi laatia omat strategiat. Asiakaspalautekyselyä tulisi kehittää, toteuttaa se verkkopohjaisena ja ottaa käyttöön kaikissa yksiköissä. Mittarit tuli-si liittää ydinprosesseihin ja jakaa ne laitos-alue-yksikkö -tasoille. Säännölliset raportit tulisi automatisoida ja antaa niiden tulostusoikeudet käyttäjille. Lisäksi kehittämishankkeita ja projekteja voisi hieman vähentää mutta viedä ne tehokkaammin läpi. Normi- ja informaatio-ohjaus ovat kiinteä osa tulosohjausta. Normiohjaus perustuu pääasiassa säädöksiin ja informaatio-ohjaus tiedolla ohjaamiseen. Informaatio-ohjauksessa tulisi kiinnittää huomiota aluekeskuksen tiedottamiseen, ettei yksiköitä ohjata keskushallinnosta aluekeskuksen ohi. Keskushallinnon tulisi myös päivittää ohjeistukset nopeammin erityisesti lakimuutosten yhteydessä. Myös vastuuta voisi jakaa enemmän alueille. Käyttöön voisi ottaa uuden tiedotuskanavan, esimerkiksi sähköinen uutislehtinen tai info-näytöt taukotiloissa.