Free Flap Monitoring. Using Tissue Oxygen Measurement and Positron Emission Tomography

Aims:This study was carried out to evaluate the feasibility of two different methods to determine free flap perfusion in cancer patients undergoing major reconstructive surgery. The hypotheses was that low perfusion in the flap is associated with flap complications. Patients and methods: Between August 2002 and June 2008 at the Department of Otorhinolaryngology – Head and Neck Surgery, Department of Surgery, and at the PET Centre, Turku, 30 consecutive patients with 32 free flaps were included in this study. The perfusion of the free microvascular flaps was assessed with positron emission tomography (PET) and radioactive water ([¹⁵O] H₂O) in 40 radiowater injections in 33 PET studies. Furthermore, 24 free flaps were monitored with a continuous tissue oxygen measurement using flexible polarographic catheters for an average of three postoperative days. Results: Of the 17 patients operated on for head and neck (HN) cancer and reconstructed with 18 free flaps, three re-operations were carried out due to poor tissue oxygenation as indicated by p_tiO₂ monitoring results and three other patients were reoperated on for postoperative hematomas in the operated area. Blood perfusion assessed with PET (BF_PET) was above 2.0 mL / min / 100 g in all flaps and a low flap-to-muscle BFPET ratio appeared to correlate with poor survival of the flap. Survival in this group of HN cancer patients was 9.0 months (median, range 2.4-34.2) after a median follow-up of 11.9 months (range 1.0-61.0 months). Seven HN patients of this group are alive without any sign of recurrence and one patient has died of other causes. All of the 13 breast reconstruction patients included in the study are alive and free of disease at a median follow-up time of 27.4 months (range 13.9-35.7 months). Re-explorations were carried out in three patients due data provided by p_tiO₂ monitoring and one re-exploration was avoided on the basis of adequate blood perfusion assessed with PET. Two patients had donorsite morbidity and 3 patients had partial flap necrosis or fat necrosis. There were no total flap losses. Conclusions: P_tiO₂ monitoring is a feasible method of free flap monitoring when flap temperature is monitored and maintained close to the core temperature. When other monitoring methods give controversial results or are unavailable, [₁₅O] H₂O PET technique is feasible in the evaluation of the perfusion of the newly reconstructed free flaps.

Lymph node transfer in the treatment of postmastectomy lymphedema

Background: Lymphedema is a debilitating disorder with few treatment options. Clinical studies have shown that microvascular lymph node transfer may improve the lymphatic function of the affected limb. This study provides information about the clinical efficacy and safety of this procedure. Further, the biological background of this technique is clarified with an analysis of postoperative production of lymphatic growth factors and cytokines related to lymphangiogenesis. Patients and Methods: The effect of lymph node transfer to recipient and donor sites was analyzed with lymphoscintigraphy, limb circumference measurements, and appearance of clinical symptoms. Axillary seroma samples were analyzed from four patient groups: Axillary lymph node removal (ALND), Microvascular breast reconstruction (BR), lymph node transfer (LN) and combined lymph node transfer and breast reconstruction (LN-BR). Results: The postoperative lymphatic transport index was improved in 7/19 patients. Ten patients were able to reduce or discontinue compression therapy 6 - 24 months postoperatively. The donor lower limb lymphatic flow was slightly impaired (Ti >10) in 2 patients. No donor site lymphedema symptoms appeared during the 8 – 56-month follow-up. A high concentration of the VEGF-C protein was detected in the seroma fluid of all flap transfer groups. The concentration of the anti-inflammatory and anti-fibrotic cytokine IL-10 was increased in the LN-BR group samples when compared to the ALND or BR group. Conclusions: According to this preliminary study, the lymph node transfer seems to be beneficial for the lymphedema patients. However, a randomized study comparing the effect of BR and LN-BR is needed to evaluate the clinical efficacy of lymph node transfer. In addition, the effect of this surgery on the donor site needs to be studied further. The clinical effects of the lymph node transfer might be partly mediated by increased production of the lymphangiogenic growth factor (VEGF-C) as well as the anti-fibrotic cytokine (IL-10).