Co-creating Value For Smart Phone Operating Systems Via Virtual Discussion Forums

In the traditional way, value is created by manufacturer or producer of a product without engaging the customers. So, traditionally value creation is a monopoly in the part of a manufacturer. After gathering all the raw materials the manufacturers are inserting value to a product. And the inserted value is recognized in the time of consuming the product. In the modern time though there is traditional way of value creation but with the increase of more educated, smart, and technically sound customers the idea of value creation has changed. Now, customers are also contributing in value creation as value co-creator even before the product is consumed. This scenario has been encountered in the thesis with the main purpose of how value is cocreated in smart phone operating systems. The purpose is further divided into the following supobjectives: o What is value co-creation in smart phone operating systems? o Who participates in value co-creation in smart phone operating systems? o What are the procedures that are involved in value co-creation in smart phone operating systems? The research was conducted as a qualitative desk study by observing two of the leading smart phone operating system providers. Data has been collected from the official discussion forum of both the operating system providers. Other general concepts relating to the purpose of the study has been encountered through literature review. The research findings reveal that customers and companies both together co-create value of anticipated level when they communicate and interact with each other. However, most of the time customer to customer interactions, dialogues and discussions that come out in the core conversation help the value co-creation. The value co-creation framework sets up the customer at the main focus of value creation theory. By nullifying the inherited notion that companies only create value within its boundary and provide it to their customers in exchange of currencies. Rationally, it has been commenced that the firms are merely compromising value propositions to its customers. But the value has been co-created in a point where offerings are combined and interacted with customers’ capabilities, knowledge, resources and perceptions. This new perspective has radically altered the prospect of firms towards its customers. Typically customers are now taking part in value cocreation as a crucial member.

Evaluation of the Efficiency of Line-Start Permanent-Magnet Machines as a Function of the Operating Temperature

The standard squirrel-cage induction machine has nearly reached its maximum efficiency. In order to further increase the energy efficiency of electrical machines, the use of permanent magnets in combination with the robust design and the line start capability of the induction machine is extensively investigated. Many experimental designs have been suggested in literature, but recently, these line-start permanent-magnet machines (LSPMMs) have become off-the-shelf products available in a power range up to 7.5 kW. The permanent magnet flux density is a function of the operating temperature. Consequently, the temperature will affect almost every electrical quantity of the machine, including current, torque, and efficiency. In this paper, the efficiency of an off-the-shelf 4-kW three-phase LSPMM is evaluated as a function of the temperature by both finite-element modeling and by practical measurements. In order to obtain stator, rotor, and permanent magnet temperatures, lumped thermal modeling is used.

Kahden lämmitysjärjestelmiä valmistavan tuotantoyksikön toimintojen yhdistäminen kustannustehokkuuden lisäämiseksi

Tämä työ käsittelee Oilon Oy:n tehtaan layout -suunnittelua, kun yhdistetään kaksi eri kiinteistössä toimivaa tuotantoyksikköä saman katon alle. Yksiköt ovat Hollolassa toimiva Oilon Home Oy ja Lahden pääkonttorissa toimiva Oilon Industry Oy. Yhdistämisellä haetaan säästöjä tuotantoyksiköiden välisistä logistiikkakuluista sekä kiinteistön vuokra- ja ylläpitokuluista ja samalla tehostetaan tehtaan sisäistä materiaalinkäsittelyä. Oilon Oy on toiminut Lahden pääkonttorissa jo yli 50 vuoden ajan ja sen tuotanto on kokenut historiansa aikana useita pienempiä muutoksia, jotka ovat jättäneet nykyiseen layoutiin paljon toivomisenvaraa. Jotta molemmat tuotantoyksiköt saadaan mahtumaan Lahden yksikköön, on sinne saatava luotua tarvittavat tilat siellä olemassa oleville toiminnoille ja Hollolan yksiköstä saapuville tuotantolinjoille. Työn alussa perehdytään kirjallisuuden avulla siihen kuinka tuotanto on kehittynyt maailmalla lähihistorian aikana, jotta voidaan paremmin ymmärtää Oilon Oy:n nykytilanteeseen johtaneita syitä. Koska Hollolasta saapuville tuotantolinjoille ei ole tarkoitus rakentaa uutta tuotantotilaa, pyritään tilaa vapauttamaan Lahden tehtaalta varastointia tehostamalla ja sen logistiikkaa helpottamalla. Tämän vuoksi vertaillaan yleisimpiä tavaroiden varastointi ratkaisuita sekä tutkitaan kuinka materiaalin käsittelyä voitaisiin tehostaa varastossa ja tuotantosuluissa. Varastoinnin tehostaminen ei kuitenkaan yksin riitä vapauttamaan tarvittavia tiloja, joten layout-muutoksen aikana rakennetaan myös kaksi uuttaa varastohallia. Uudessa layout-suunnitelmassa huomioidaan kunkin solun nykyiset ja tulevat tilantarpeet, sekä rakennetaan ne niin, että työvoimaa voidaan käyttää niissä joustavasti eri tuotteiden valmistamiseen. Tutkimusmetodeina käytetään teemahaastatteluita, joilla selvitetään työntekijöiden tarpeet sekä kirjallisuuden avulla perehdytään Lean-tuotantoon, kanban:iin, 5S:ään ja arvovirta-analyysiin. Näitä soveltamalla saadaan luotua tehokkaasti toimiva kokonaisuus, jolla tavoitellut säästöt saadaan toteutumaan.

A Business Incubator, Accelerator, or Coworking Space? Case Health Innovation Village at GE

Health Innovation Village at GE is one of the new communities targeted for startup and growth-oriented companies. It has been established at the premises of a multinational conglomerate that will promote networking and growth of startup companies. The concept combines features from traditional business incubators, accelerators, and coworking spaces. This research compares Health Innovation Village to these concepts regarding its goals, target clients, source of income, organization, facilities, management, and success factors. In addition, a new incubator classification model is introduced. On the other hand, Health Innovation Village is examined from its tenants’ perspective and improvements are suggested. The work was implemented as a qualitative case study by interviewing GE staff with connections to Health Innovation Village as well as startup entrepreneurs and employees’ working there. The most evident features of Health Innovation Village correspond to those of business incubators although it is atypical as a non-profit corporate business incubator. Strong network orientation and connections to venture capitalists are common characteristics of these new types of accelerators. The design of the premises conforms to the principles of coworking spaces, but the services provided to the startup companies are considerably more versatile than the services offered by coworking spaces. The advantages of Health Innovation Village are that there are first-class premises and exceptionally good networking possibilities that other types of incubators or accelerators are not able to offer. A conglomerate can also provide multifaceted special knowledge for young firms. In addition, both GE and the startups gained considerable publicity through their cooperation, indeed a characteristic that benefits both parties. Most of the expectations of the entrepreneurs were exceeded. However, communication and the scope of cooperation remain challenges. Micro companies spend their time developing and marketing their products and acquiring financing. Therefore, communication should be as clear as possible and accessible everywhere. The startups would prefer to cooperate significantly more, but few have the time available to assume the responsibility of leadership. The entrepreneurs also expected to have more possibilities for cooperation with GE. Wider collaboration might be accomplished by curation in the same way as it is used in the well-functioning coworking spaces where curators take care of practicalities and promote cooperation. Communication issues could be alleviated if the community had its own Intranet pages where all information could be concentrated. In particular, a common calendar and a room reservation system could be useful. In addition, it could be beneficial to have a section of the Intranet open for both the GE staff and the startups so that those willing to share their knowledge and those having project offers could use it for advertising.