OMXH 25-yhtiöiden valuuttariski ja siltä suojautuminen

Tämän kandidaatintutkielman tavoitteena on selvittää OMXH 25-yhtiöiden altistumista valuuttariskille ja kuinka nämä yhtiöt suojautuvat siltä. Tässä tutkimuksessa on lisäksi selvitetty näiden yhtiöiden tärkeimmät ulkomaanvaluutat ja yhtiöiden suojausstrategioita. Valuuttariskin suuruuden selvittämiseksi yhtiöiden vieraan valuuttaista liikevaihtoa verrattiin yhtiön kokonaisliikevaihtoon. Tutkimuksen aineistona on käytetty yhtiöiden vuosien 2013 ja 2014 tilinpäätöksiä. Aineistosta on lisäksi rajattu pois OMXH 25-yhtiöiden joukosta Nordea, Sampo, Elisa ja Telia Sonera. Nämä yhtiöt rajattiin pois, koska ne soveltuivat huonosti tämän tutkimuksen kohteiksi. Tutkimuksen teoriakehys on rakennettu keskeisten teorioiden ja käsitteiden avulla. Valuuttariski voidaan jakaa kolmeen osaan: transaktioriskiin, ekonomiseen riskiin ja translaatioriskiin. Valuuttariskin suojauksessa käytettävät instrumentit ovat termiinit, optiot, swap-sopimukset ja vieraan valuuttainen velka. Myös suojaamatta jättämisen mahdollisuutta on tutkittu. Tutkimuksessa kävi ilmi yhtiöiden merkittävä altistuminen valuuttariskille liikevaihdolla mitattuna. Yhtiöiden liikevaihdosta lähes 50% tapahtui jossain muussa valuutassa kuin euroissa. Yhtiöt käyttävät valuuttariskiltä suojautumiseen pääasiassa termiinejä, mutta myös muita instrumentteja käytetään jonkin verran. Yhtiöt keskittyvät eniten transaktioriskin suojaamiseen ekonomisen riskin ja tranlaatioriskin jäädessä pienemmälle huomiolle. Myös aikaisemmissa tutkimuksissa on saatu samankaltaisia tuloksia. Viime vuosien voimakkaat valuuttakurssimuutokset ovat vaikuttaneet yhtiöiden tuloksiin negatiivisesti ja erityisesti ruplan arvon voimakas heikentyminen suhteessa euroon aiheutti joillekkin yhtiöille merkittäviä valuuttakurssitappioita. Tärkein vieras valuutta tutkituille yhtiöille oli USA:n dollari. Korkeasta suojausasteesta huolimatta suurinosa tutkituista yhtiöistä kärsi valuuttakurssitappiota kumpanakin tarkasteltuna vuonna.

Prospects of Bitcoin diffusion

Currency is something people deal with every day in their lives. The contemporary society is very much revolving around currencies. Even though technological development has been rapid, the principle of currency has stayed relatively unchanged for a long time. Bitcoin is a digital currency that introduced an alternative to other digital currencies, and to the traditional physical currencies. Bitcoin is peer-to-peer, open source, and it erases the need of a third party in transactions. Bitcoin has since inception gained certain fame, but it has not established itself as a common currency in the world. The purpose of this study was to analyse what kind of potential does Bitcoin have to become a widely accepted currency in day-to-day transactions. The main research question was divided into three sub questions: • What kind of a process is the diffusion of new innovations? • What kinds of factors speak for the wider adoption of Bitcoin? • What kinds of factors speak against the wider adoption of Bitcoin? The purpose of the study was approached by having diffusion of innovations as the theoretical framework. The four elements in diffusion of innovations are, innovation, communication, time, and social system. The theoretical framework is applied to Bitcoin, and the research questions answered by analysing Bitcoin’s potential diffusion prospects. The body of research data consisted of media texts and statistics. In this study, content analysis was the research method. The main findings of the study are that Bitcoin has clear strengths, but it faces a large amount of uncertainty. Bitcoin’s strong areas are the transactions. They are fast, easy, and cheap. From the innovation diffusion perspective Bitcoin is still relatively unknown, and the general public’s attitudes towards it are sceptical. The research findings purport that Bitcoin has potential demand especially when the financial system of a region is dysfunctional, or when there is a financial crisis. Bitcoin is not very trusted, and the majority of people do not see a reason to start using Bitcoin in the future. A large number of people associate it with illegal activities. In general people are largely unaware of what Bitcoin is or what are the strengths and weaknesses. Bitcoin is an innovative alternative currency. However, unless people see a major need for Bitcoin due to a financial crisis, or dysfunctionality in the financial system, Bitcoin will not become much more widespread as it is today. Bitcoin’s underlying technology can be harnessed to multiple uses. Developments in that field in the future are something that future researchers could look into.

POLITICAL RISK IN FOREIGN DIRECT INVESTMENT IN THE RUSSIAN ELECTRIC POWER SECTOR

Russia approved ambitious reform plan for the electricity sector in 2001 including privatisation of the country’s huge thermal generation assets. So far the sector had suffered from power shortages, aging infrastructure, substantial electricity losses, and weak productivity and profitability numbers. There was obvious need for foreign investments and technologies. The reform was rather successful; the generation assets were privatised in auctions in 2007-2008 and three European energy companies, E.On, Enel and Fortum, invested in and obtained together over 10% of the Russian production assets. The novelty of these foreign investments serves unique object for the study. The political risk is involved in the FDI due to the industry’s social and economic importance. The research’s objective was to identify and analyse the political risk that foreign investors face in the Russian electricity sector. The research had qualitative study method and the empirical data was collected by interviewing. The research’s theoretical framework was based on the existing political risk theories and it focused to understand the Russian government in relation to the country’s stability and define both macro-level and micro-level sources of political risk for the foreign direct investments in the sector. The research concludes that the centralised and obscure political decision-making, economic constriction, high level of governmental control in economy and corruption form the country’s internal macro-level risk sources for the foreign investors in the sector. Additionally the retribution due to the companies’ home country actions, possible violent confrontations at the Russian borders and the currency instability are externally originated risk sources. In the electricity industry there is risk of tightened governmental control and increased regulation and taxation. Similarly the company-level risk sources link to the unreformed heating sector, bargaining with the authorities, diplomatic stress between host and home countries and to companies and government’s divergent perspective for the profit-making. The research stresses the foreign companies’ ability to cope with the characteristics of Russian political environment. In addition to frequent political and market risk assessment, the companies need to focus on currency protection against rouble’s rate fluctuation and actively build good company-citizenship in the country. Good relationship is needed with the Russian political authorities. The political risk identification and the research’s conclusive framework also enable political risk study assessments for other industries in Russia