Monolithic zirconium dioxide as a full contour restorative material: With special emphasis on the optical and mechanical properties

Full contour monolithic zirconia restorations have shown an increased popularity in the dental field over the recent years, owing to its mechanical and acceptable optical properties. However, many features of the restoration are yet to be researched and supported by clinical studies to confirm its place among the other indirect restorative materials This series of in vitro studies aimed at evaluating and comparing the optical and mechanical properties, light cure irradiance, and cement polymerization of multiple monolithic zirconia material at variable thicknesses, environments, treatments, and stabilization. Five different monolithic zirconia materials, four of which were partially stabilized and one fully stabilized were investigated. The optical properties in terms of surface gloss, translucency parameter, and contrast ratio were determined via a reflection spectrophotometer at variable thicknesses, coloring, sintering method, and after immersion in an acidic environment. Light cure irradiance and radiant exposure were quantified through the specimens at variable thicknesses and the degree of conversion of two dual-cure cements was determined via Fourier Transform Infrared spectroscopy. Bi-axial flexural strength was evaluated to compare between the partially and fully stabilized zirconia prepared using different coloring and sintering methods. Surface characterization was performed using a scanning electron microscope and a spinning disk confocal microscope. The surface gloss and translucency of the zirconia investigated were brand and thickness dependent with the translucency values decreasing as the thickness increased. Staining decreased the translucency of the zirconia and enhanced surface gloss as well as the flexural strength of the fully stabilized zirconia but had no effect on partially stabilized zirconia. Immersion in a corrosive acid increased surface gloss and decreased the translucency of some zirconia brands. Zirconia thickness was inversely related to the amount of light irradiance, radiant exposure, and degree of monomer conversion. Type of sintering furnace had no effect on the optical and mechanical properties of zirconia. Monolithic zirconia maybe classified as a semi-translucent material that is well influenced by the thickness, limiting its use in the esthetic zones. Conventional acid-base reaction, autopolymerizing and dual-cure cements are recommended for its cementation. Its desirable mechanical properties give it a high potential as a restoration for posterior teeth. However, close monitoring with controlled clinical studies must be determined before any definite clinical recommendations can be drawn.

Bacterial adhesion and biofilm formation on monolithic zirconia

Tutkimuksen tavoitteena oli selvittää bakteerien kiinnittymistä ja bakteeribiofilmin muodostumista implanttimateriaalien pinnalla. Monoliittisen zirkonian ja lasikeramien käyttö implanttikruunujen materiaaleina kasvaa jatkuvasti. Zirkoniaa käytetään myös abutmenttien materiaalina esteettisillä alueilla. Tällä hetkellä on vain vähän tutkimustietoa näiden implanttikruunumateriaalien sekä implanttikruunujen sementoimiseen käytetyn sementin pinnalla tapahtuvasta bakteeriadheesiosta ja biofilmin muodostumisesta. Bakteerien adheesiota ja biofilmin muodistumista tutkittiin neljän eri materiaalin pinnalla. Tutkimuksessa käytetyt materiaalit olivat: (1) Litiumdisilikaatti (LDS; IPS e.max CAD, Ivoclar Vivadent,kontrolli), (2) Kokonaan stabiloitu zirkonia (FSZ; Prettau Anterior, Zirkonzahn), (3) Osittain stabiloitu zirkonia (PSZ; Katana, Noritake), ja (4) Kaksoiskovetteinen sementti (DCC; Multilink hybrid abutment cement, Ivoclar Vivadent). Kaikki tutkimuksessa käytetyt materiaalit valmisteltiin ja kiillotettiin valmistajien ohjeiden mukaisesti Tutkittavat pinnat inkuboitiin Streptococcus mutans-suspensiossa +37°C:ssä asteessa. Bakteeriadheesiotestissä inkubointiaika oli 30 minuuttia ja biofilmitestissä vastaava aika oli 24 tuntia. Materiaalien pintoja tarkasteltiin myös elektronimikroskooppia käyttäen. Tutkimuksessa todettiin, että bakteeriadheesiossa oli eroja eri materiaalien välillä. Biofilmin. muodostumisessa ei todettu tilastollisesti merkittäviä eroja tutkittavien materiaalien välillä.