Social entrepreneurship – Believe in it or not!

The practice of social entrepreneurship already exists for a long time but the concept is quite new and has more recently raised a growing interest among academics. However, the majority of researches and considerations about the subject have taken a strong positive concern by omitting some sort of a critical reflection. The idea of this study is to consider the gap between the very optimistic and the more precautious concerns about social entrepreneurship. It means presenting the advantages and downsides connected to the topic in the business, public and third sector. The aim is to help the reader building his/her own belief on social entrepreneurship by considering the positive and negative sides of social entrepreneurship. Hence, the research is intended to take a critical step and aims to answer to the following research questions:  Shall we believe in social entrepreneurship?  What are the reasons for believing or not in social entrepreneurship taking into account the advantages and possible risks of it in the business, public, and third sector? The theoretical framework consists of the comparison between the promising and precautious sides about social entrepreneurship for private, public and non-governmental organizations including the actors or participants inside these sectors. The empirical part is conducted using a qualitative method. Personal interviews of experts in the fields of business, public and third sectors were handled. The purpose of this approach is to compare the critics in theory with the experience of persons dealing with social entrepreneurship. The results from the interviews revealed that in general, reasons for believing in social entrepreneurship prevail over critics about the subject. Social entrepreneurship may not yet represent a full performing business. Concerns for weakening the public power and putting aside the interests of communities in need may exist too. Furthermore, naïve and extra liberal ways of thinking or doing can lead to practices going in opposition with initial social objectives. Nevertheless, problems about social entrepreneurship would be mainly due to the young age of the movement. Time and experience would give better foundations and results to social entrepreneurs. Critics about social entrepreneurship could also easily be done to any sorts of business. Overall, the positive considerations of social entrepreneurship with skillful, motivated and responsible actors could represent some useful tools for enterprises, governments and charities. Some tools among many other possibilities to help people in need.

Integrating corporate social responsibility into business in Finnish consumer goods companies

The motives for this study originated from the notion that surprisingly little academic literature is found on actually managing and putting corporate social responsibility (CSR) into practice, in comparison with the definitions and frameworks of the concept itself. Regardless of the author, CSR has been considered consisting of three dimensions: economic, social and environmental. The question behind the three dimensions has always been whether socially and environmentally responsible behavior can lead to increased economic performance and improve the competitiveness of a company. Most of the current CSR development has related to the quantification of environmental and social performance in order to review these along with the established financial key ratios, which are based on the law and the reporting obligation of the companies. However, the previous research has mainly focused on US companies whereas studies with a European viewpoint, let alone Nordic, have been mostly lacking. Furthermore, it has been discovered recently that the integration of corporate responsibility into business is identified as the greatest challenge in CSR management in Finnish large companies. Therefore the integration of CSR into business in Finnish consumer goods companies provided an interesting, topical and somewhat obscure purpose for this study. This was further divided into three research questions concerning the reasons for CSR engagement, the role of the stakeholders and the practice of corporate responsibility. This study did not aim to build a new theory; instead an explorative viewpoint was regarded more appropriate. Accordingly, qualitative research approach and case study design were adopted in the study. Semi-structured theme interviews were used as a primary data collection method and complemented with secondary data such as websites, responsibility reports and another recent CSR study. There were four Finnish managers as interviewees of whom three presented companies and one non-profit organization. The results were somewhat convergent but differences arose as a result of the companies being at different stages as regards corporate responsibility. However, this provided only more insight into the implementation of CSR. The voluntary CSR initiatives, responsibility reporting, stakeholders and CSR management were identified as the most important viewpoints on the practical side of CSR, besides a key requirement for the integration of CSR into business to be credible was found to be a favorable management attitude. Based on the findings of this study it was admitted that giving concrete advice on CSR management is really a challenge and there is no one generally accepted and right manner to integrate corporate responsibility successfully into business.

"Rakkaat poikaiset!". Simon ja Wilhelmina Janssonin perhekirjeet egodokumentteina (1858-1887)

Kustavilainen talonpoikaislaivuri Simon Jansson ja hänen vaimonsa Wilhelmina o.s. Widbom kävivät kolmenkymmenen vuoden ajan kirjeenvaihtoa kouluun ja yliopistoon lähetettyjen poikiensa Waldemar, Evald ja Emil Jahnssonin kanssa. Lähes 150 suomen- ja ruotsinkielistä kirjettä on säilynyt Suomalaisen Kirjallisuuden Seuran kirjallisuusarkistossa ja Turun maakunta-arkistossa. Lähiluvun kautta kirjeistä muodostuu yksityiskohtainen lähde saaristolaisperheen elämäntapaan, arkeen ja työhön sekä saaristoyhteisön sosiaalisen kanssakäymisen muotoihin. Ne kertovat myös ensimmäisen polven oppisivistyneistön synnystä ja niistä resursseista, joita hyödyntäen koulua käymättömät vanhemmat saattoivat kouluttaa lapsensa. Tutkimus liittyy suomalaisten 1800-luvun itseoppineiden kirjoittajien tekstien ja maaseudun kirjallistumisen tutkimukseen. Keskeinen käsite on egodokumentti, jolla tarkoitetaan kirjeitä ja muita tekstejä, joissa kirjoittaja kertoo itse omasta elämästään. Hollantilainen ja ranskalainen egodokumenttien tutkimus on pyrkinyt haastamaan uudenlaisten lähdeaineistojen kautta käsityksiä menneisyydestä sekä nostamaan esiin muun muassa yksilöllisen kokemuksen, kirjoittamisen kulttuurin ja dokumenttien materiaalisuuden. Janssonin perheen kirjeet poikkeavat monin tavoin 1800-luvun säätyläisten kirjeistä. Niiden funktio oli hyvin käytännöllinen ja arkinen, mutta ne olivat myös vanhempien keino tukea perheen yhteistä sosiaalisen nousun projektia. Kustavia koskevan tiheän uutisoinnin kautta ne pyrkivät pitämään kaupunkilaistuvat pojat osana vanhaa yhteisöään. Perheen isä vastasi suurelta osin kirjeenvaihdosta ja siihen liittyvästä huolenpidosta, mikä kertoo sukupuolittuneen työnjaon joustavuudesta saaristossa. Tutkimus osoittaa, ettei isän ammattiin perustuva yliopisto-opiskelijoiden tutkimus ole tavoittanut sitä naisten kautta välittyvää sosiaalista ja kulttuurista pääomaa, joka saattoi olla ratkaiseva perheiden kouluttaessa lapsiaan. Kirjeiden analyysi tarkentaa kuvaa perinteisen talonpoikaispurjehduksen sopeutumisesta vuosisadan loppupuolen uudistuksiin.

Examining human-centered design practice in the mobile apps era

Human-Centered Design (HCD) is a well-recognized approach to the design of interactive computing systems that supports everyday and professional lives of people. To that end, the HCD approach put central emphasis on the explicit understanding of users and context of use by involving users throughout the entire design and development process. With mobile computing, the diversity of users as well as the variety in the spatial, temporal, and social settings of the context of use has notably expanded, which affect the effort of interaction designers to understand users and context of use. The emergence of the mobile apps era in 2008 as a result of structural changes in the mobile industry and the profound enhanced capabilities of mobile devices, further intensify the embeddedness of technology in the daily life of people and the challenges that interaction designers face to cost-efficiently understand users and context of use. Supporting interaction designers in this challenge requires understanding of their existing practice, rationality, and work environment. The main objective of this dissertation is to contribute to interaction design theories by generating understanding on the HCD practice of mobile systems in the mobile apps era, as well as to explain the rationality of interaction designers in attending to users and context of use. To achieve that, a literature study is carried out, followed by a mixed-methods research that combines multiple qualitative interview studies and a quantitative questionnaire study. The dissertation contributes new insights regarding the evolving HCD practice at an important time of transition from stationary computing to mobile computing. Firstly, a gap is identified between interaction design as practiced in research and in the industry regarding the involvement of users in context; whereas the utilization of field evaluations, i.e. in real-life environments, has become more common in academic projects, interaction designers in the industry still rely, by large, on lab evaluations. Secondly, the findings indicate on new aspects that can explain this gap and the rationality of interaction designers in the industry in attending to users and context; essentially, the professional-client relationship was found to inhibit the involvement of users, while the mental distance between practitioners and users as well as the perceived innovativeness of the designed system are suggested in explaining the inclination to study users in situ. Thirdly, the research contributes the first explanatory model on the relation between the organizational context and HCD; essentially, innovation-focused organizational strategies greatly affect the cost-effective usage of data on users and context of use. Last, the findings suggest a change in the nature of HCD in the mobile apps era, at least with universal consumer systems; evidently, the central attention on the explicit understanding of users and context of use shifts from an early requirements phase and continual activities during design and development to follow-up activities. That is, the main effort to understand users is by collecting data on their actual usage of the system, either before or after the system is deployed. The findings inform both researchers and practitioners in interaction design. In particular, the dissertation suggest on action research as a useful approach to support interaction designers and further inform theories on interaction design. With regard to the interaction design practice, the dissertation highlights strategies that encourage a more cost-effective user- and context-informed interaction design process. With the continual embeddedness of computing into people’s life, e.g. with wearable devices and connected car systems, the dissertation provides a timely and valuable view on the evolving humancentered design.