Prodrug strategies of antiviral nucleotides: Studies on enzymatically and thermally removable phosphate protecting groups

Antiviral nucleosides are compounds that are used against viruses, such as human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) and hepatitis C virus (HCV). To act as therapeutic agent, the antiviral nucleoside needs to be phosphorylated to nucleotide in the body in three consecutive phosphorylation steps by cellular or viral enzymes. The first phosphorylation to the nucleoside monophosphate is often inefficient and leads to poor antiviral activity. The antiviral efficacy can be improved by applying a prodrug strategy and delivering the antiviral nucleoside directly as its monophosphate. In prodrug strategies of antiviral nucleotides, the negative charges on the phosphate moiety are temporarily masked with protecting groups. Once inside the cell, the protecting groups are removed by enzymatic or chemical processes. Many prodrug strategies apply biodegradable protecting groups, the removal of which is triggered by esterase enzymes. Several studies have, however, demonstrated that the removal rate of the second and subsequent esterase labile protecting groups significantly slows down after the first protecting group is removed due to the negative charge on the phosphodiester intermediate, which disturbs the catalytic site of the enzyme. In this thesis, esterase labile protecting group strategies where the issue of retardation could be avoided were studied. Prodrug candidates of antiviral nucleotides were synthesized and kinetic studies on the chemical and enzymatic stability were carried out. In the synthesized compounds, the second protecting group is cleaved from the monophosphate some other mechanism than esterase triggered activation or the structure of prodrug requires only one protecting group. In addition, esterase labile protecting group which is additionally thermally removable was studied. This protecting group was cleaved from oligomeric phosphodiesters both enzymatically and thermally and seems most attractive of the studied phosphate protecting groups. However, the rate of the thermal removal still is too slow to allow efficient protection of longer oligonucleotides and needs optimization. Key words: antiviral, nucleotide, prodrug, protecting group, biodegradable

Socially shared metacognitive regulation during collaborative learning processes in student dyads and small groups

Traditionally metacognition has been theorised, methodologically studied and empirically tested from the standpoint mainly of individuals and their learning contexts. In this dissertation the emergence of metacognition is analysed more broadly. The aim of the dissertation was to explore socially shared metacognitive regulation (SSMR) as part of collaborative learning processes taking place in student dyads and small learning groups. The specific aims were to extend the concept of individual metacognition to SSMR, to develop methods to capture and analyse SSMR and to validate the usefulness of the concept of SSMR in two different learning contexts; in face-to-face student dyads solving mathematical word problems and also in small groups taking part in inquiry-based science learning in an asynchronous computer-supported collaborative learning (CSCL) environment. This dissertation is comprised of four studies. In Study I, the main aim was to explore if and how metacognition emerges during problem solving in student dyads and then to develop a method for analysing the social level of awareness, monitoring, and regulatory processes emerging during the problem solving. Two dyads comprised of 10-year-old students who were high-achieving especially in mathematical word problem solving and reading comprehension were involved in the study. An in-depth case analysis was conducted. Data consisted of over 16 (30–45 minutes) videotaped and transcribed face-to-face sessions. The dyads solved altogether 151 mathematical word problems of different difficulty levels in a game-format learning environment. The interaction flowchart was used in the analysis to uncover socially shared metacognition. Interviews (also stimulated recall interviews) were conducted in order to obtain further information about socially shared metacognition. The findings showed the emergence of metacognition in a collaborative learning context in a way that cannot solely be explained by individual conception. The concept of socially-shared metacognition (SSMR) was proposed. The results highlighted the emergence of socially shared metacognition specifically in problems where dyads encountered challenges. Small verbal and nonverbal signals between students also triggered the emergence of socially shared metacognition. Additionally, one dyad implemented a system whereby they shared metacognitive regulation based on their strengths in learning. Overall, the findings suggested that in order to discover patterns of socially shared metacognition, it is important to investigate metacognition over time. However, it was concluded that more research on socially shared metacognition, from larger data sets, is needed. These findings formed the basis of the second study. In Study II, the specific aim was to investigate whether socially shared metacognition can be reliably identified from a large dataset of collaborative face-to-face mathematical word problem solving sessions by student dyads. We specifically examined different difficulty levels of tasks as well as the function and focus of socially shared metacognition. Furthermore, the presence of observable metacognitive experiences at the beginning of socially shared metacognition was explored. Four dyads participated in the study. Each dyad was comprised of high-achieving 10-year-old students, ranked in the top 11% of their fourth grade peers (n=393). Dyads were from the same data set as in Study I. The dyads worked face-to-face in a computer-supported, game-format learning environment. Problem-solving processes for 251 tasks at three difficulty levels taking place during 56 (30–45 minutes) lessons were video-taped and analysed. Baseline data for this study were 14 675 turns of transcribed verbal and nonverbal behaviours observed in four study dyads. The micro-level analysis illustrated how participants moved between different channels of communication (individual and interpersonal). The unit of analysis was a set of turns, referred to as an ‘episode’. The results indicated that socially shared metacognition and its function and focus, as well as the appearance of metacognitive experiences can be defined in a reliable way from a larger data set by independent coders. A comparison of the different difficulty levels of the problems suggested that in order to trigger socially shared metacognition in small groups, the problems should be more difficult, as opposed to moderately difficult or easy. Although socially shared metacognition was found in collaborative face-to-face problem solving among high-achieving student dyads, more research is needed in different contexts. This consideration created the basis of the research on socially shared metacognition in Studies III and IV. In Study III, the aim was to expand the research on SSMR from face-to-face mathematical problem solving in student dyads to inquiry-based science learning among small groups in an asynchronous computer-supported collaborative learning (CSCL) environment. The specific aims were to investigate SSMR’s evolvement and functions in a CSCL environment and to explore how SSMR emerges at different phases of the inquiry process. Finally, individual student participation in SSMR during the process was studied. An in-depth explanatory case study of one small group of four girls aged 12 years was carried out. The girls attended a class that has an entrance examination and conducts a language-enriched curriculum. The small group solved complex science problems in an asynchronous CSCL environment, participating in research-like processes of inquiry during 22 lessons (á 45–minute). Students’ network discussion were recorded in written notes (N=640) which were used as study data. A set of notes, referred to here as a ‘thread’, was used as the unit of analysis. The inter-coder agreement was regarded as substantial. The results indicated that SSMR emerges in a small group’s asynchronous CSCL inquiry process in the science domain. Hence, the results of Study III were in line with the previous Study I and Study II and revealed that metacognition cannot be reduced to the individual level alone. The findings also confirm that SSMR should be examined as a process, since SSMR can evolve during different phases and that different SSMR threads overlapped and intertwined. Although the classification of SSMR’s functions was applicable in the context of CSCL in a small group, the dominant function was different in the asynchronous CSCL inquiry in the small group in a science activity than in mathematical word problem solving among student dyads (Study II). Further, the use of different analytical methods provided complementary findings about students’ participation in SSMR. The findings suggest that it is not enough to code just a single written note or simply to examine who has the largest number of notes in the SSMR thread but also to examine the connections between the notes. As the findings of the present study are based on an in-depth analysis of a single small group, further cases were examined in Study IV, as well as looking at the SSMR’s focus, which was also studied in a face-to-face context. In Study IV, the general aim was to investigate the emergence of SSMR with a larger data set from an asynchronous CSCL inquiry process in small student groups carrying out science activities. The specific aims were to study the emergence of SSMR in the different phases of the process, students’ participation in SSMR, and the relation of SSMR’s focus to the quality of outcomes, which was not explored in previous studies. The participants were 12-year-old students from the same class as in Study III. Five small groups consisting of four students and one of five students (N=25) were involved in the study. The small groups solved ill-defined science problems in an asynchronous CSCL environment, participating in research-like processes of inquiry over a total period of 22 hours. Written notes (N=4088) detailed the network discussions of the small groups and these constituted the study data. With these notes, SSMR threads were explored. As in Study III, the thread was used as the unit of analysis. In total, 332 notes were classified as forming 41 SSMR threads. Inter-coder agreement was assessed by three coders in the different phases of the analysis and found to be reliable. Multiple methods of analysis were used. Results showed that SSMR emerged in all the asynchronous CSCL inquiry processes in the small groups. However, the findings did not reveal any significantly changing trend in the emergence of SSMR during the process. As a main trend, the number of notes included in SSMR threads differed significantly in different phases of the process and small groups differed from each other. Although student participation was seen as highly dispersed between the students, there were differences between students and small groups. Furthermore, the findings indicated that the amount of SSMR during the process or participation structure did not explain the differences in the quality of outcomes for the groups. Rather, when SSMRs were focused on understanding and procedural matters, it was associated with achieving high quality learning outcomes. In turn, when SSMRs were focused on incidental and procedural matters, it was associated with low level learning outcomes. Hence, the findings imply that the focus of any emerging SSMR is crucial to the quality of the learning outcomes. Moreover, the findings encourage the use of multiple research methods for studying SSMR. In total, the four studies convincingly indicate that a phenomenon of socially shared metacognitive regulation also exists. This means that it was possible to define the concept of SSMR theoretically, to investigate it methodologically and to validate it empirically in two different learning contexts across dyads and small groups. In-depth micro-level case analysis in Studies I and III showed the possibility to capture and analyse in detail SSMR during the collaborative process, while in Studies II and IV, the analysis validated the emergence of SSMR in larger data sets. Hence, validation was tested both between two environments and within the same environments with further cases. As a part of this dissertation, SSMR’s detailed functions and foci were revealed. Moreover, the findings showed the important role of observable metacognitive experiences as the starting point of SSMRs. It was apparent that problems dealt with by the groups should be rather difficult if SSMR is to be made clearly visible. Further, individual students’ participation was found to differ between students and groups. The multiple research methods employed revealed supplementary findings regarding SSMR. Finally, when SSMR was focused on understanding and procedural matters, this was seen to lead to higher quality learning outcomes. Socially shared metacognition regulation should therefore be taken into consideration in students’ collaborative learning at school similarly to how an individual’s metacognition is taken into account in individual learning.

Phylogenetic Analysis of Avidins and Expression of Novel Avidins from Lactrodectus hesperus and Hoeflea phototrophica

Avidins (Avds) are homotetrameric or homodimeric glycoproteins with typically less than 130 amino acid residues per monomer. They form a highly stable, non-covalent complex with biotin (vitamin H) with Kd = 10-15 M (for chicken Avd). The best-studied Avds are the chicken Avd from Gallus gallus and streptavidin from Streptomyces avidinii, although other Avd studies have also included Avds from various origins, e.g., from frogs, fishes, mushrooms and from many different bacteria. Several engineered Avds have been reported as well, e.g., dual-chain Avds (dcAvds) and single-chain Avds (scAvds), circular permutants with up to four simultaneously modifiable ligand-binding sites. These engineered Avds along with the many native Avds have potential to be used in various nanobiotechnological applications. In this study, we made a structure-based alignment representing all currently available sequences of Avds and studied the evolutionary relationship of Avds using phylogenetic analysis. First, we created an initial multiple sequence alignment of Avds using 42 closely related sequences, guided by the known Avd crystal structures. Next, we searched for non-redundant Avd sequences from various online databases, including National Centre for Biotechnology Information and the Universal Protein Resource; the identified sequences were added to the initial alignment to expand it to a final alignment of 242 Avd sequences. The MEGA software package was used to create distance matrices and a phylogenetic tree. Bootstrap reproducibility of the tree was poor at multiple nodes and may reflect on several possible issues with the data: the sequence length compared is relatively short and, whereas some positions are highly conserved and functional, others can vary without impinging on the structure or the function, so there are few informative sites; it may be that periods of rapid duplication have led to paralogs and that the differences among them are within the error limit of the data; and there may be other yet unknown reasons. Principle component analysis applied to alternative distance data did segregate the major groups, and success is likely due to the multivariate consideration of all the information. Furthermore, based on our extensive alignment and phylogenetic analysis, we expressed two novel Avds, lacavidin from Lactrodectus Hesperus, a western black widow spider, and hoefavidin from Hoeflea phototrophica, an aerobic marine bacterium, the ultimate aim being to determine their X-ray structures. These Avds were selected because of their unique sequences: lacavidin has an N-terminal Avd-like domain but a long C-terminal overhang, whereas hoefavidin was thought to be a dimeric Avd. Both these Avds could be used as novel scaffolds in biotechnological applications.

Minkä nuorena hallitsee sen aikuisena taitaa? Liikehallinnan pysyvyys kouluiästä aikuisikään – 24 vuoden seurantatutkimus

Tässä 24 vuoden pitkittäistutkimuksessa tutkitaan liikehallinnan kehitystä ja pysyvyyttä kouluiästä aikuisikään. Lisäksi ennustetaan ja selitetään aikuisiän liikehallintaa kouluiän liikehallinnan perusteella. Tutkimukseen osallistui 44 miestä ja 44 naista eri puolilta Suomea, joiden liikehallintaa mitattiin kouluiässä 1985 ja 1988 (9–16-vuotiaina) sekä aikuisiässä 2009 (33−39-vuotiaina). Liikehallintaa mitattiin kuudella liiketehtävämittarilla (flamingoseisonta, tarkkuusheittokiinniotto, kahdeksikkokuljetus, edestakaisinhyppely, vauhditon 5-loikka ja kärrynpyörä) sekä niistä lasketulla summamuuttujalla. Miesten ja naisten liikehallintaa vertailtiin varianssianalyysilla. Kouluiässä pojat menestyivät välineenkäsittelytehtävissä ja tytöt tasapaino- ja voimistelutehtävissä, mutta kokonaisuutena sukupuolten välillä ei ollut eroa. Aikuisena miehet olivat naisia parempia lähes kaikissa tehtävissä. Kovarianssianalyysissä havaittiin, että kehonrakenteeltaan (BMI) erilaisten ryhmien liikehallinnassa oli vain yksittäisiä eroja koulu- ja aikuisiässä. Toistettujen mittausten varianssianalyysissa ilmeni, että kouluiässä molempien sukupuolten liikehallinnan kehitys oli samanlaista. Kouluiän jälkeen kevyiden ja keskipainoisten poikien liikehallinta parani, mutta painavien tulokset eivät muuttuneet. Kevyiden tyttöjen tuloksissa ei tapahtunut muutosta, mutta keskipainoisten ja painavien tulokset heikkenivät. Koululiikunnan tehostus- ja vertailuryhmien välille kouluiässä muodostuneet erot kaventuivat tai katosivat aikuisena. Kouluiän liikehallinnaltaan eritasoisten ryhmien väliset erot kaventuivat, mutta eivät poistuneet kouluiän jälkeen. Klusterianalyysissa tutkittavat jakaantuivat kouluiässä neljään liikehallintatyyppiin (yleishyvät, tasapainoiset, pallotaitajat ja yleisheikot), jotka säilyivät myös aikuisiässä, mutta niiden väliset erot kaventuivat. Ristiintaulukointi ja khiin neliö -testi osoittivat, että tasoryhmän ja liikehallinnan monipuolisuuden pysyvyys oli vahvaa kouluiästä aikuisikään. Koulu- ja aikuisiän liikehallintatulosten välinen korrelaatio oli naisilla (0.69) vahvempaa kuin miehillä (0.48). Yksittäiset mittaustulokset kouluiässä selittivät keskimäärin 33 % aikuisiän tuloksista (korrelaation neliö). Regressioanalyysissa miesten aikuisiän liikehallintaa selittivät kouluiän muuttujista parhaiten liikehallinnan monipuolisuus sekä liikkuvuus (61 %), mutta naisilla vain liikehallinnan monipuolisuus (37 %). Miesten ja naisten erot liikehallinnassa syntyivät kouluiän jälkeen, mikä johtunee erilaisista liikuntatavoista ja -harrastuksista. Kouluiän liikehallinta määritti vahvasti varsinkin tytöillä aikuisiän liikehallintaa sekä yksilö- että ryhmätasolla, mikä korostaa monipuolisen koululiikunnan merkitystä. Yksilölliset muutokset olivat mahdollisia. Kouluiän jälkeen erityisesti naiset ja kehonrakenteeltaan painavat tarvitsisivat hermolihasjärjestelmää monipuolisesti kuormittavaa ja liikesuunniltaan moniulotteista liikuntaa liikehallinnan kehittämiseksi ja ylläpitämiseksi. Naisten liikehallinnan taantuminen varsinkin tasapainotehtävissä voi altistaa kaatumistapaturmille ja rajoittaa fyysistä toimintakykyä.

Catalogue Of the main groups of Ephemera Collection

The Ephemera Collection has been organised in groups based on the topic. The collection also includes groups formed on the basis of the publication type.