2007 Greenhouse Gas Emissions from Selected Iowa Source Categories

The Department’s 2007 Greenhouse Gas Inventory is a refinement of previous statewide inventories. It is a bottom-up inventory of two sectors – fossil fuel combustion at federally-recognized major sources of air pollution and fossil fuel combustion and ethanol fermentation at dry mill ethanol plants. This is the first bottomup greenhouse gas inventory conducted for Iowa and the first bottom-up greenhouse gas inventory of ethanol plants in the nation that the Department is aware of. In a bottom-up inventory, facility-specific activity data is used to calculate emissions. In a top-down inventory, aggregate activity data is used to calculate emissions. For example, this bottom-up inventory calculates greenhouse gas emissions from the fossil fuel combustion at each individual facility instead of using the total amount of fossil fuel combusted state-wide, which would be a top-down inventory method. The advantage to a bottom-up inventory is that the calculations are more accurate than a top-down inventory. However, because the two methods differ, the results from a bottom-up inventory are not directly comparable to a top-down inventory.

Health consultation : Silver City petroleum release and municipal wells, Silver City, Mills County, Iowa (2005)

A resident of Silver City, Iowa requested the Iowa Department of Public Health (IDPH) Hazardous Waste Site Health Assessment Program to evaluate the health impacts of a petroleum release in Silver City, Iowa, and the health impacts from the presence of chemicals detected in wells utilized as the source of municipal water for the citizens of Silver City and in the treated municipal water supply. This health consultation addresses exposure to residents of Silver City to organic chemicals within the groundwater and water supply and potential health effects at the levels of exposure. The information in this health consultation was current at the time of writing. Data that emerges later could alter this document’s conclusions and recommendations.

Iowa Petroleum Underground Storage Tank Board, June 30, 2002

State Agency Audit Report

Iowa Petroleum Underground Storage Tank Board State of Iowa, Independent Auditor's Reports Financial Statements and Supplementary Information, June 30, 2003

State Agency Audit Report

Iowa Petroleum Underground Storage Tank Board, State of Iowa, Independent Auditor's Reports, Financial Statements and Supplementary Information, June 30, 2004

State Audit Reports

Iowa Petroleum Underground Storage Tank Board, State of Iowa, Independent Auditor's Reports, Basic Financial Statements and Supplementary Information, Schedule of Findings, June 30, 2005

State Audit Reports

Audit report on the Iowa Petroleum Underground Storage Tank Board (UST Board) for the year ended June 30, 2006

Audit report on the Iowa Petroleum Underground Storage Tank Board (UST Board) for the year ended June 30, 2006

Audit report on the Iowa Petroleum Underground Storage Tank Board (UST Board) for the year ended June 30, 2007

Audit report on the Iowa Petroleum Underground Storage Tank Board (UST Board) for the year ended June 30, 2007

Audit report on the Iowa Petroleum Underground Storage Tank Board (UST Board) for the year ended June 30, 2008

Audit report on the Iowa Petroleum Underground Storage Tank Board (UST Board) for the year ended June 30, 2008

Audit report on the Iowa Petroleum Underground Storage Tank Board (UST Board) for the year ended June 30, 2009

Audit report on the Iowa Petroleum Underground Storage Tank Board (UST Board) for the year ended June 30, 2009

Audit report on the Iowa Petroleum Underground Storage Tank Board (UST Board) for the year ended June 30, 2010

Audit report on the Iowa Petroleum Underground Storage Tank Board (UST Board) for the year ended June 30, 2010

Greenhouse Gas and Nitrogen Fertilizer Scenarios for U.S. Agriculture and Global Biofuels, June 2011

This analysis uses the 2011 FAPRI-CARD (Food and Agricultural Policy Research Institute–Center for Agricultural and Rural Development) baseline to evaluate the impact of four alternative scenarios on U.S. and world agricultural markets, as well as on world fertilizer use and world agricultural greenhouse gas emissions. A key assumption in the 2011 baseline is that ethanol support policies disappear in 2012. The baseline also assumes that existing biofuel mandates remain in place and are binding. Two of the scenarios are adverse supply shocks, the first being a 10% increase in the price of nitrogen fertilizer in the United States, and the second, a reversion of cropland into forestland. The third scenario examines how lower energy prices would impact world agriculture. The fourth scenario reintroduces biofuel tax credits and duties. Given that the baseline excludes these policies, the fourth scenario is an attempt to understand the impact of these policies under the market conditions that prevail in early 2011. A key to understanding the results of this fourth scenario is that in the absence of tax credits and duties, the mandate drives biofuel use. Therefore, when the tax credits and duties are reintroduced, the impacts are relatively small. In general, the results show that the entire international commodity market system is remarkably robust with respect to policy changes in one country or in one sector. The policy implication is that domestic policy changes implemented by a large agricultural producer like the United States can have fairly significant impacts on the aggregate world commodity markets. A second point that emerges from the results is that the law of unintended consequences is at work in world agriculture. For example, a U.S. nitrogen tax that might presumably be motivated for environmental benefit results in an increase in world greenhouse gas emissions. A similar situation occurs in the afforestation scenario in which crop production shifts from high-yielding land in the United States to low-yielding land and probably native vegetation in the rest of the world, resulting in an unintended increase in global greenhouse gas emissions.

Audit report on the Iowa Petroleum Underground Storage Tank Board for the year ended June 30, 2011

Audit report on the Iowa Petroleum Underground Storage Tank Board for the year ended June 30, 2011

Audit report on the Iowa Petroleum Underground Storage Tank Board for the year ended June 30, 2012

Audit report on the Iowa Petroleum Underground Storage Tank Board for the year ended June 30, 2012

Audit report on the Iowa Petroleum Underground Storage Tank Board for the year ended June 30, 2013

Audit report on the Iowa Petroleum Underground Storage Tank Board for the year ended June 30, 2013