Policy -Strategy Option Description, January 30, 2009

Like many states, Iowa faces significant challenges on the energy front.  Energy prices have  surged in recent years to record levels before declining precipitously following the financial  crisis that broke in September 2008.  Despite this pullback, the fundamentals that contributed to  higher energy prices are expected to return once economies rebound. Oil prices have gone up  on increased demand, driven in large part by developing countries such as China and India,  whose economies have been rapidly expanding.  Natural gas prices have also fluctuated  dramatically, trading in a range from $4.50 to $13.00/MMBtu over the past year, but are unlikely  to remain at low levels over the long term.  As shown in our analysis later on in this report, the  difference in levelized cost of electricity from a gas‐fired combined cycle plant can vary  significantly depending on the fuel cost.    Dependence on others for energy supply involves significant risks and uncertainties.  Thus, if  Iowa wishes to reduce its dependence on others – or even achieve energy independence – Iowa  needs to pursue actions on a numbers of fronts.  Following the status quo is not an option.    A carbon tax would change the energy landscape in Iowa.  Since Iowa is currently 75%  dependent on coal, a carbon tax could mean that generators, and in turn ratepayers, could be on  the hook for higher electricity prices, though it remains to be seen exactly what the tax scheme  will be.  In addition to existing plants, a carbon tax would also have a significant impact on the  cost of new generation plant.  We have modeled carbon taxes ranging from $0‐50/ton in our  analysis in the Appendix.  However, if a more aggressive carbon policy came into play resulting  in market values of for example, $100/ton or even $200/ton, then that could raise the cost of coal‐  and gas‐fired generation significantly, making alternatives such as wind more economical.

Effect of Mix Times on PCC Properties, HR-1066, 1998

The objectives of this research were the collection and evaluation of the data pertaining to the importance of concrete mixing time on air content and distribution, consolidation and workability for pavement construction. American Society for Testing and Materials (ASTM) standard C 94 was used to determine the significance of the mixing time on the consistency of the mix being delivered and placed on grade. Measurements of unit weight, slump, air content, retained coarse aggregate and compressive strength were used to compare the consistency of the mix in the hauling unit at the point of mixing and at the point placement. An analysis of variance was performed on the data collected from the field tests. Results were used to establish the relationship between selected mixing time and the portland cement concrete properties tested. The results were also used to define the effect of testing location (center and side of truck, and on the grade) on the concrete properties. Compressive strength test concepts were used to analyze the hardened concrete pavement strength. Cores were obtained at various locations on each project on or between vibrator locations to evaluate the variance in each sample, between locations, and mixing times. A low-vacuum scanning electron microscope (SEM) was used to study air void parameters in the concrete cores. Combining the data from these analysis thickness measurements and ride in Iowa will provide a foundation for the formulation of a performance based matrix. Analysis of the air voids in the hardened concrete provides a description of the dispersion of the cemtitious materials (specifically flyash) and air void characteristics in the pavement. Air void characteristics measured included size, shape and distribution.