Fifth Judicial District, Department of Correctional Services Facility and Site Study Final Report, December 12, 2008

The goal of the study is to locate a site appropriate for a 170 offender unit, based on an understanding of current needs, existing and proposed procedure and the longevity of existing facility use. The study is based on master-plan process. A framework on which multiple stages of infrastructure development can be based is initiated through the systemic study of infrastructure condition, infrastructure needs and treatment objectives.

Drug Court Process Evaluation Report, February 2008

The Iowa Consortium for Substance Abuse Research and Evaluation conducted a process evaluation in 2007 on the seven adult and juvenile drug courts existing in Iowa in 2003. (A list of adult and juvenile drug courts established in Iowa from 2004 through 2007 appears in the appendix.) The drug courts evaluated in this study differ on several important factors, including the judicial supervision model used, resources available, and the severity level of clients served. The divergent resources and clients should be considered when comparing outcomes across courts. Section 1 provides an overview of each drug court included in this study.

Statewide Process and Comparative Outcomes Study of 2003 Iowa Adult and Juvenile Drug Courts, August 2009

A statewide evaluation of the six adult and three juvenile drug courts in operation during calendar year 2003 was conducted. Completion rates, recidivism, substance abuse treatment, and supervision and placement (juveniles only) costs were examined by model (Judge and Community Panel) and by Judicial District. In addition, adult drug court participants were compared with a group of offenders who were screened and declined or were rejected by drug court in 2003 (referred) and a sample of offenders starting probation in 2003 (probationer). The adult participant and comparison groups were tracked from their entry into drug court, or the study, through December 31, 2007. This yielded an average post-program follow-up time of almost 3 years (2.9) for drug court participants. For the juvenile portion, drug court participants were compared with a group matched on several demographic and offense variables (Matched Comparison group) and juveniles referred to drug court who did not enter the program (Referred Comparison group). The juvenile participant and comparison groups were tracked from their entry into drug court, or the study, through approximately 16 quarters after program discharge with an end date of December 31, 2007.

Fourth Judicial District Department of Correctional Services - Special Investigation, September 1, 2000 - March 7, 2002

State Agency Audit Report - Special Investigation

Report of Recommendations to the Iowa Judicial Branch, June 30, 2002

State Agency Audit Report

Iowa Judicial Retirement System, June 30, 2002

State Agency Audit Report

Combined Report of Recommendations to the Eight Judicial District Departments of Correctional Services, June 30, 2002

State Agency Audit Report - Combined Report

Report of Recommendations to the Iowa Judicial Branch - County Clerks of District Courts, June 30, 2002

State Agency Audit Report

5B Judicial District Youth Services, June 30, 2001 & June 30, 2002

Other Audit Reports

Iowa Judicial Retirement System, June 30, 2003

State Agency Audit Report

5B Judicial District Youth Services, June 30, 2002 & 2003

Other Audit Reports - Independent Auditor's Reports, Financial Statements, Schedule of Findings

5B Judicial District Youth Services, June 30, 2001 & June 30, 2002

Other Audit Reports

Report of Recommendations to the Iowa Judicial Branch - County Clerks of District Courts, June 30, 2003

Audit Reports - Other Audit Reports

Probation Revocation Project in Iowa's Sixth Judicial District, 2002

Sixth Judicial District Pilot Project treats probation violation hearings in the same manner as parole violation hearings. When a probationer is serving a suspended prison sentence, the project permits an administrative law judge to dispose of the case rather than requiring the District Court to adjudicate the violation.

Report of Recommendations to the Iowa Judicial Branch, June 30, 2003

State Agency Audit Report