The Recent International and Regulatory Decisions about Geographical Indications, 2007

As worldwide consumer demand for high-quality products and for information about these products increases, labels and geographical indications (GIs) can serve to signal quality traits to consumers. However, GI systems among countries are not homogeneous and can be used as trade barriers against competition. Philosophical differences between the European Union and the United States about how GIs should be registered and protected led to the formation of a WTO dispute settlement panel. In this paper we discuss the issues behind the dispute, the World Trade Organization (WTO) panel decision, and the EU response to the panel decision leading to the new Regulation 510/2006. Given the potential for GI labels to supply consumer information, context is provided for the discussion using recent literature on product labeling. Implications are drawn regarding the importance of the panel decision and the EU response relative to GI issues yet to be negotiated under the Doha Round.

Iowa Department of Administrative Services Customer Council Archives, 2003

Archive of meeting agendas and minutes for 2003 for the DAS-General Services Enterprise Customer Council.

Iowa Department of Administrative Services Customer Council Archives, 2004

Archive of meeting agendas and minutes for 2004 for the DAS-General Services Enterprise Customer Council.

Iowa Department of Administrative Services Customer Council Archives, 2005

Archive of meeting agendas and minutes for 2005 for the DAS-General Services Enterprise Customer Council.

Iowa Department of Administrative Services Customer Council Archives: Human Services, 2004

Archive of meeting agendas and minutes for 2004 for the DAS-Human Resources Enterprise Customer Council.

Iowa Department of Administrative Services Customer Council Archives: Human Services,2005

Archive of meeting agendas and minutes for 2005 for the DAS-Human Resources Enterprise Customer Council.

Iowa Department of Administrative Services Customer Council Archives: State Accounting, 2004

Archive of meeting agendas and minutes for 2004 for the DAS-I/3 Customer Council.

Iowa Department of Administrative Services Customer Council Archives: State Accounting, 2005

Archive of meeting agendas and minutes for 2005 for the DAS-I/3 Customer Council.

Second Report on the Public Archives,1907

This is a second report, submitted by Benjamin F. Shaughbum, on the Public Archives for the time period of September 18, 1906 to May 11, 1907. As a "program for immediate action" six recommendations were submitted to the Trustees of the State Library and Historical Department of Iowa under the date of September 18, 1906.

LSTA Five Year Plan Evaluation Report 2008-2012, March 29, 2012

The evaluation’s overarching question was “Did the activities undertaken through the state’s LSTA plan achieve results related to priorities identified in the Act?” The evaluation was conducted and is organized according to the six LSTA priorities. The research design employed two major methodologies: 1. Data sources from Iowa Library Services / State Library of Iowa2 as well as U.S and state sources were indentified for quantitative analysis. These sources, which primarily reflect outputs for various projects, included: Statistics from the Public Library Annual Survey Statistics collected internally by Iowa Library Services such as number of libraries subscribing to sponsored databases, number of database searches, attendance at continuing education events, number of interlibrary loan transactions Evaluation surveys from library training sessions, professional development workshops and other programs supported by LSTA funds Internal databases maintained by Iowa Library Services Impact results from post training evaluations conducted by Iowa Library Services 2010 Iowa census data from the U.S. Census Bureau LSTA State Program Reports for the grant period 2. Following the quantitative analysis, the evaluator gathered qualitative data through interviews with key employees, a telephone focus group with district library consultants and two surveys: LSTA Evaluation Survey (Public Libraries) and LSTA Evaluation Survey (Academic Libraries). Both surveys provided sound samples with 43 representatives of Iowa’s 77 academic libraries and 371 representatives of Iowa’s 544 public libraries participating. Respondents represented libraries of all sizes and geographical areas. Both surveys included multiple choice and rating scale items as well as open-ended questions from which results were coded to identify trends, issues and recommendations.