Vehicular Traffic Flow Map, 1988

Traffic volumes represented on this map are annual average daily traffic volumes between major traffic generators: highway junctions and cities.

Vehicular Traffic Flow Map, 1990

Traffic volumes represented on this map are annual average daily traffic volumes between major traffic generators: highway junctions and cities.

Vehicular Traffic Flow Map, 1992

Traffic volumes represented on this map are annual average daily traffic volumes between major traffic generators: highway junctions and cities.

Vehicular Traffic Flow Map, 1994

Traffic volumes represented on this map are annual average daily traffic volumes between major traffic generators: highway junctions and cities.

Vehicular Traffic Flow Map, 1996

Traffic volumes represented on this map are annual average daily traffic volumes between major traffic generators: highway junctions and cities.

Vehicular Traffic Flow Map, 1998

Traffic volumes represented on this map are annual average daily traffic volumes between major traffic generators: highway junctions and cities.

Vehicular Traffic Flow Map, 2000

Traffic volumes represented on this map are annual average daily traffic volumes between major traffic generators: highway junctions and cities.

Vehicular Traffic Flow Map, 2002

Traffic volumes represented on this map are annual average daily traffic volumes between major traffic generators: highway junctions and cities.

Vehicular Traffic Flow Map, 2004

Traffic volumes represented on this map are annual average daily traffic volumes between major traffic generators: highway junctions and cities.

Vehicular Traffic Flow Map, 2006

Traffic volumes represented on this map are annual average daily traffic volumes between major traffic generators: highway junctions and cities.

Vehicular Traffic Flow Map, 2008

Traffic volumes represented on this map are annual average daily traffic volumes between major traffic generators: highway junctions and cities.

Simulation and Analysis of Arterial Traffic Operations Along the U.S. 61 Corridor in Burlington, Iowa, 1998

The Center for Transportation Research and Education (CTRE) used the traffic simulation model CORSIM to access proposed capacity and safety improvement strategies for the U.S. 61 corridor through Burlington, Iowa. The comparison between the base and alternative models allow for evaluation of the traffic flow performance under the existing conditions as well as other design scenarios. The models also provide visualization of performance for interpretation by technical staff, public policy makers, and the public. The objectives of this project are to evaluate the use of traffic simulation models for future use by the Iowa Department of Transportation (DOT) and to develop procedures for employing simulation modeling to conduct the analysis of alternative designs. This report presents both the findings of the U.S. 61 evaluation and an overview of model development procedures. The first part of the report includes the simulation modeling development procedures. The simulation analysis is illustrated through the Burlington U.S. 61 corridor case study application. Part I is not intended to be a user manual but simply introductory guidelines for traffic simulation modeling. Part II of the report evaluates the proposed improvement concepts in a side by side comparison of the base and alternative models.

Utilization of Remote Traffic Monitoring Devices for Urban Freeway Work Zone Assessment Final Report, January 2012

The objective of this project was to promote and facilitate analysis and evaluation of the impacts of road construction activities in Smart Work Zone Deployment Initiative (SWZDI) states. The two primary objectives of this project were to assess urban freeway work-zone impacts through use of remote monitoring devices, such as radar-based traffic sensors, traffic cameras, and traffic signal loop detectors, and evaluate the effectiveness of using these devices for such a purpose. Two high-volume suburban freeway work zones, located on Interstate 35/80 (I-35/I-80) through the Des Moines, Iowa metropolitan area, were evaluated at the request of the Iowa Department of Transportation (DOT).

Development of a Traffic Control Devices and Pavement Markings Manual for Iowa's Cities and Counties with a Survery of Common Practices, April 2001

Transportation agencies in Iowa are responsible for a significant public investment with the installation and maintenance of traffic control devices and pavement markings. Included in this investment are thousands of signs and other inventory items, equipment, facilities, and staff. The proper application of traffic control devices and pavement markings is critical to public safety on streets and highways, and local governments have a prescribed responsibility under the Code of Iowa to properly manage these assets. This research report addresses current traffic control and pavement marking application, maintenance, and management in Iowa.

Flow of Cases For Civil Rights Complaints,

Please note the following process describes handling employment, public accommodation, credit, or education cases. The process for housing complaints differs, from timelines to opportunities to seek judicial remedies.