Acreage Living, May 2008

Newsletter for those who reside on acreages in Iowa. Produced by the Iowa State University Extension Office.

Acreage Living, November 2008

Newsletter for those who reside on acreages in Iowa. Produced by the Iowa State University Extension Office.

Acreage Answers, October-November 2000, Vol. 1, no. 4

Newsletter for those who reside on acreages in Iowa. Produced by the Iowa State University Extension Office.

Acreage Living, October 2008

Newsletter for those who reside on acreages in Iowa. Produced by the Iowa State University Extension Office.

Acreage Living, May 2009

Newsletter for those who reside on acreages in Iowa. Produced by the Iowa State University Extension Office.

Acreage Answers, August-September 2001, Vol. 2, no.4

Newsletter for those who reside on acreages in Iowa. Produced by the Iowa State University Extension Office.

Acreage Answers, October-November 2001, Vol. 2, no.5

Newsletter for those who reside on acreages in Iowa. Produced by the Iowa State University Extension Office.

Acreage Answers, December 2001-January 2002, Vol. 2, no.6

Newsletter for those who reside on acreages in Iowa. Produced by the Iowa State University Extension Office.

Acreage Answers, February-March 2002, Vol. 3, no.1

Newsletter for those who reside on acreages in Iowa. Produced by the Iowa State University Extension Office.

Acreage Answers, April-May 2002, Vol. 3, no.2

Newsletter for those who reside on acreages in Iowa. Produced by the Iowa State University Extension Office.

Acreage Answers, June-July 2002, Vol. 3, no.3

Newsletter for those who reside on acreages in Iowa. Produced by the Iowa State University Extension Office.

Acreage Answers, October-November 2002, Vol. 3, no.5

Newsletter for those who reside on acreages in Iowa. Produced by the Iowa State University Extension Office.

Acreage Answers, December 2002-January 2003, Vol. 3, no.6

Newsletter for those who reside on acreages in Iowa. Produced by the Iowa State University Extension Office.

Evaluation of the Iowa Department of Transportation's Compensatory Wetland Mitgation Program, August 30, 2004

The purpose of this investigation was to evaluate the Compensatory Wetland Mitigation Program at the Iowa Department of Transportation (DOT) in terms of regulatory compliance. Specific objectives included: 1) Determining if study sites meet the definition of a jurisdictional wetland. 2) Determining the degree of compliance with requirements specified in Clean Water Act Section 404 permits. A total of 24 study sites, in four age classes were randomly selected from over 80 sites currently managed by the Iowa DOT. Wetland boundaries were delineated in the field and mitigation compliance was determined by comparing the delineated wetland acreage at each study site to the total wetland acreage requirements specified in individual CWA Section 404 permits. Of the 24 sites evaluated in this study, 58 percent meet or exceed Section 404 permit requirements. Net gain ranged from 0.19 acre to 27.2 acres. Net loss ranged from 0.2 acre to 14.6 acres. The Denver Bypass 1 site was the worst performer, with zero acres of wetland present on the site and the Akron Wetland Mitigation Site was the best performer with slightly more than 27 acres over the permit requirement. Five of the 10 under-performing sites are more than five years post construction, two are five years post construction, one is three years post construction and the remaining two are one year post construction. Of the sites that meet or exceed permit requirements, approximately 93 percent are five years or less post construction and approximately 43 percent are only one year old. Only one of the 14 successful sites is more than five years old. Using Section 404 permit acreage requirements as the criteria for measuring success, 58 percent of the wetland mitigation sites investigated as part of this study are successful. Using net gain/loss as the measure of success, the Compensatory Wetland Mitigation Program has been successful in creating/restoring nearly 44 acres of wetland over what was required by permits.

The Long-Run Impact of Corn-Based Ethanol on the Grain, Oilseed, and Livestock Sectors: A Preliminary Assessment, November 2006

The ongoing growth of corn-based ethanol production raises some fundamental questions about what impact continued growth will have on U.S. and world agriculture. Estimates of the long-run potential for ethanol production can be made by calculating the corn price at which the incentive to expand ethanol production disappears. Under current ethanol tax policy, if the prices of crude oil, natural gas, and distillers grains stay at current levels, then the break-even corn price is $4.05 per bushel. A multi-commodity, multi country system of integrated commodity models is used to estimate the impacts if we ever get to $4.05 corn. At this price, corn-based ethanol production would reach 31.5 billion gallons per year, or about 20% of projected U.S. fuel consumption in 2015. Supporting this level of production would require 95.6 million acres of corn to be planted. Total corn production would be approximately 15.6 billion bushels, compared to 11.0 billion bushels today. Most of the additional corn acres come from reduced soybean acreage. Wheat markets would adjust to fulfill increased demand for feed wheat. Corn exports and production of pork and poultry would all be reduced in response to higher corn prices and increased utilization of corn by ethanol plants. These results should not be viewed as a prediction of what will eventually materialize. Rather, they indicate a logical end point to the current incentives to invest in corn-based ethanol plants.