97 resultados para Judicial process
Resumo:
Voter Information: • Answers to Questions about Judicial Retention Elections • Biographies of Judges on the 2012 Iowa Ballot
Resumo:
Retention elections are intended to focus on the professional competency of Iowa’s judges rather than the popularity of individual rulings. In a retention election, voters decide whether a judge should be retained or removed from office. If a judge receives a majority of “yes” votes, the judge serves another full term. If a judge receives a majority of “no” votes, the judge is removed from office at the end of the year.
Resumo:
Please note the following process describes handling employment, public accommodation, credit, or education cases. The process for housing complaints differs, from timelines to opportunities to seek judicial remedies.
Resumo:
Report on the Iowa Judicial Branch – County Clerks of District Courts, a part of the State of Iowa, for the year ended June 30, 2011
Resumo:
Combined report on the eight Judicial District Departments of Correctional Services for the year ended June 30, 2011
Resumo:
Audit report on the Iowa Judicial Retirement System for the year ended June 30, 2012
Resumo:
Report on the Iowa Judicial Branch for the year ended June 30, 2012
Resumo:
In July of 2009, the Division of Criminal and Juvenile Justice Planning (CJJP) received Byrne Justice Assistance Grant/American Recovery and Reinvestment Act funding from the Governor’s Office of Drug Control Policy to conduct a process and outcome evaluation of the STAR (Sisters Together Achieving Recovery) program housed at the Iowa Correctional Institution for Women (ICIW) in Mitchellville, Iowa. The STAR Program is a licensed inpatient substance abuse treatment program that utilizes a Therapeutic Community model (TC). All offenders exiting the STAR program between October 1, 2004 and June 30, 2008 were included in the study (n=173). A comparison sample was drawn of offenders exiting the ICIW during the same release time frame with identified but untreated substance abuse needs (n= 173). March 31, 2010 was designated as the cut-off date for the study. This yielded an average post-program follow-up time of 3.1 years. The STAR group was further divided into two groups by time of program exit. Participants exiting the program between October 1, 2004 and June 30, 2006 were designated as STAR 1 (n=78) and those exiting the program between July 1, 2006 and June 30, 2008 were designated as STAR 2 (n=95). In order to have comparable tracking time between STAR groups, tracking time for STAR 1 concluded July 31, 2008. This yielded an average post release follow-up time of 2.4 years for both groups. Demographic, Program, Intervention, and Outcome data were examined. Comparisons were made between groups as well as categories of participation.
Resumo:
Report on the Iowa Judicial Branch – County Clerks of District Courts, a part of the State of Iowa, for the year ended June 30, 2012
Resumo:
State of Iowa Appropriations Process. Flow chart of the process.
Resumo:
Budget Process: The Governor and the State Legislature appropriate the state resources after the revenue receipts are estimated by the Revenue Estimating Conference.
Resumo:
This report outlines the current drugs testing practices and using these practices for testing requirements.
Resumo:
Combined report on the eight Judicial District Departments of Correctional Services for the year ended June 30, 2012
Resumo:
Audit report on the Iowa Judicial Retirement System for the year ended June 30, 2013
Resumo:
Report on a review of the Sixth Judicial District Department of Correctional Services for the period July 1, 2008 through June 30, 2012
