Iowa Civil Rights Commission Annual Report, 1972

Annual report for the Iowa Civil Rights Commission

Iowa Civil Rights Commission Communicator, Spring 1997, Vol. 15, no. 1

Newsletter produced by the Iowa Civil Rights Commission

Iowa Civil Rights Commission Communicator, Fall 2000, Vol. 18, no. 2

Newsletter produced by the Iowa Civil Rights Commission

Iowa Civil Rights Commission Communicator, Spring 2002, Vol. 20, no. 1

Newsletter produced by the Iowa Civil Rights Commission

Iowa Civil Rights Commission Communicator, Winter 1998, Vol. 16, no. 1

Newsletter produced by the Iowa Civil Rights Commission

Iowa Civil Rights Commission Communicator, Spring 2003, Vol. 21, no. 1

Newsletter produced by the Iowa Civil Rights Commission

Iowa Civil Rights Commission Communicator, Spring-Summer 2001, Vol. 19, no. 1

Newsletter produced by the Iowa Civil Rights Commission

Iowa Civil Rights Commission, Spanish Version, 2004

Brochure produced by the Iowa Civil Rights Commission

Iowa Civil Rights Commission, 2004

Brochure produced by the Iowa Civil Rights Commission

Dorothy A. Abbas and Iowa Civil Rights Commission vs. City of Hampton, 1992

Case report from the Iowa Civil Rights Commission. Dorothy A. Abbas and Iowa Civil Rights Commission vs. City of Hampton

Maxine Faye Boomgarden and Iowa Civil Rights Commission vs. Hardin County Veterans' Commission Board and Hardin County Board of Supervisors, 1991

Case report from the Civil Rights Commission. Maxine Faye Boomgarden and Iowa Civil Rights Commission vs. Hardin County Veterans' Commission Board and Hardin County Board of Supervisors.

Iowa Civil Rights Commission Annual Report, 1974

Annual report for the Iowa Civil Rights Commission

2005 Iowa Fishing Regulations, 2005

Fishing Regulations for the state of Iowa

Labeling Regulations and Segregation of First- and, Second-Generation Genetically Modified Products: Innovation Incentives and Welfare Effects, April 2005

We review some of the most significant issues and results on the economic effects of genetically modified (GM) product innovation, with emphasis on the question of GM labeling and the need for costly segregation and identity preservation activities. The analysis is organized around an explicit model that can accommodate the features of both first-generation and second-generation GM products. The model accounts for the proprietary nature of GM innovations and for the critical role of consumer preferences vis-à-vis GM products, as well as for the impacts of segregation and identity preservation and the effects of a mandatory GM labeling regulation. We also investigate briefly a novel question in this setting, the choice of “research direction”when both cost-reducing and quality-enhancing GM innovations are feasible.

Report of Recommendations to the Iowa Civil Rights Commission, June 30, 2004

State Audit Reports