Missouri River Flood Coordination Task Force Report, September 25, 2011

The Missouri River floods of 2011 will go down in history as the longest duration flooding event this state has seen to date. The combination of above normal snowfall in the upper Missouri River basin followed by the equivalent of nearly one year’s worth of rainfall in May created an above normal runoff situation which filled the Missouri River and the six main reservoirs within the basin. Compounding this problem was colder than normal temperatures which kept much of the snowpack in the upper basin on the ground longer into the spring, setting the stage for this historic event. The U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (USACE) began increasing the outflow at Gavin’s Point, near Yankton, South Dakota in May. On June 14, 2011, the outflow reached a record rate of over 160,000 cubic feet per second (cfs), over twice the previous record outflow set in 1997. This increased output from Gavin’s Point caused the Missouri River to flow out of its banks covering over 283,000 acres of land in Iowa, forcing hundreds of evacuations, damaging 255,000 acres of cropland and significantly impacting the levee system on the Missouri River basin. Over the course of the summer, approximately 64 miles of primary roads closed due to Missouri River flooding, including 54 miles of Interstate Highway. Many county secondary roads were closed by high water or overburdened due to the numerous detours and road closures in this area. As the Missouri River levels began to increase, municipalities and counties aided by State and Federal agencies began preparing for a sustained flood event. Citizens, businesses, state agencies, local governments and non‐profits made substantial preparations, in some cases expending millions of dollars on emergency protective measures to protect their facilities from the impending flood. Levee monitors detected weak spots in the levee system in all affected counties, with several levees being identified as at risk levees that could potentially fail. Of particular concern was the 28 miles of levees protecting Council Bluffs. Based on this concern, Council Bluffs prepared an evacuation plan for the approximately 30,000 residents that resided in the protected area. On May 25, 2011, Governor Branstad directed the execution of the Iowa Emergency Response Plan in accordance with Section 401 of the Stafford Act. On May 31, 2011, HSEMD Administrator, Brigadier General J. Derek Hill, formally requested the USACE to provide technical assistance and advanced measures for the communities along the Missouri River basin. On June 2, 2011 Governor Branstad issued a State of Iowa Proclamation of Disaster Emergency for Fremont, Harrison, Mills, Monona, Pottawattamie, and Woodbury counties. The length of this flood event created a unique set of challenges for Federal, State and local entities. In many cases, these organizations were conducting response and recovery operations simultaneously. Due to the length of this entire event, the State Emergency Operations Center and the local Emergency Operations Centers remained open for an extended period of time, putting additional strain on many organizations and resources. In response to this disaster, Governor Branstad created the Missouri River Recovery Coordination Task Force to oversee the State’s recovery efforts. The Governor announced the creation of this Task Force on October 17, 2011 and appointed Brigadier General J. Derek Hill, HSEMD Administrator as the chairman. This Task Force would be a temporary group of State agency representatives and interested stakeholders brought together to support the recovery efforts of the Iowa communities impacted by the Missouri River Flood. Collectively, this group would analyze and share damage assessment data, coordinate assistance across various stakeholders, monitor progress, capture best practices and identify lessons learned.

Iowa EHDI News, Fall 2009

The purpose of the newsletter is to communicate with parents and professionals about newborn hearing screening and follow up in Iowa. We will share information about: Hearing screenings Early intervention, including communication opportunities Resources available for parents and professionals “Best practices” by hospitals, Area Education Agencies (AEAs), private practice audiology offi ces or other health and education providers working with children who are deaf or hard of hearing National research Iowa EHDI program goals EHDI program progress, system development, evaluation Family stories Highlights from the EHDI Advisory Committee

Iowa EHDI News, Fall 2010

The purpose of the newsletter is to communicate with parents and professionals about newborn hearing screening and follow up in Iowa. We will share information about: Hearing screenings Early intervention, including communication opportunities Resources available for parents and professionals “Best practices” by hospitals, Area Education Agencies (AEAs), private practice audiology offi ces or other health and education providers working with children who are deaf or hard of hearing National research Iowa EHDI program goals EHDI program progress, system development, evaluation Family stories Highlights from the EHDI Advisory Committee

Iowa EHDI News, Fall 2011

The purpose of the newsletter is to communicate with parents and professionals about newborn hearing screening and follow up in Iowa. We will share information about: Hearing screenings Early intervention, including communication opportunities Resources available for parents and professionals “Best practices” by hospitals, Area Education Agencies (AEAs), private practice audiology offi ces or other health and education providers working with children who are deaf or hard of hearing National research Iowa EHDI program goals EHDI program progress, system development, evaluation Family stories Highlights from the EHDI Advisory Committee

Iowa EHDI News, Spring 2010

The purpose of the newsletter is to communicate with parents and professionals about newborn hearing screening and follow up in Iowa. We will share information about: Hearing screenings Early intervention, including communication opportunities Resources available for parents and professionals “Best practices” by hospitals, Area Education Agencies (AEAs), private practice audiology offi ces or other health and education providers working with children who are deaf or hard of hearing National research Iowa EHDI program goals EHDI program progress, system development, evaluation Family stories Highlights from the EHDI Advisory Committee

Iowa EHDI News, Spring 2011

The purpose of the newsletter is to communicate with parents and professionals about newborn hearing screening and follow up in Iowa. We will share information about: Hearing screenings Early intervention, including communication opportunities Resources available for parents and professionals “Best practices” by hospitals, Area Education Agencies (AEAs), private practice audiology offi ces or other health and education providers working with children who are deaf or hard of hearing National research Iowa EHDI program goals EHDI program progress, system development, evaluation Family stories Highlights from the EHDI Advisory Committee

Iowa EHDI News, Summer 2009

The purpose of the newsletter is to communicate with parents and professionals about newborn hearing screening and follow up in Iowa. We will share information about: Hearing screenings Early intervention, including communication opportunities Resources available for parents and professionals “Best practices” by hospitals, Area Education Agencies (AEAs), private practice audiology offi ces or other health and education providers working with children who are deaf or hard of hearing National research Iowa EHDI program goals EHDI program progress, system development, evaluation Family stories Highlights from the EHDI Advisory Committee

Iowa EHDI News, Summer 2010

The purpose of the newsletter is to communicate with parents and professionals about newborn hearing screening and follow up in Iowa. We will share information about: Hearing screenings Early intervention, including communication opportunities Resources available for parents and professionals “Best practices” by hospitals, Area Education Agencies (AEAs), private practice audiology offi ces or other health and education providers working with children who are deaf or hard of hearing National research Iowa EHDI program goals EHDI program progress, system development, evaluation Family stories Highlights from the EHDI Advisory Committee

Iowa EHDI News, Summer 2011

The purpose of the newsletter is to communicate with parents and professionals about newborn hearing screening and follow up in Iowa. We will share information about: Hearing screenings Early intervention, including communication opportunities Resources available for parents and professionals “Best practices” by hospitals, Area Education Agencies (AEAs), private practice audiology offi ces or other health and education providers working with children who are deaf or hard of hearing National research Iowa EHDI program goals EHDI program progress, system development, evaluation Family stories Highlights from the EHDI Advisory Committee

Iowa EHDI News, Winter 2009

The purpose of the newsletter is to communicate with parents and professionals about newborn hearing screening and follow up in Iowa. We will share information about: Hearing screenings Early intervention, including communication opportunities Resources available for parents and professionals “Best practices” by hospitals, Area Education Agencies (AEAs), private practice audiology offi ces or other health and education providers working with children who are deaf or hard of hearing National research Iowa EHDI program goals EHDI program progress, system development, evaluation Family stories Highlights from the EHDI Advisory Committee

Iowa EHDI News, Winter 2010

The purpose of the newsletter is to communicate with parents and professionals about newborn hearing screening and follow up in Iowa. We will share information about: Hearing screenings Early intervention, including communication opportunities Resources available for parents and professionals “Best practices” by hospitals, Area Education Agencies (AEAs), private practice audiology offi ces or other health and education providers working with children who are deaf or hard of hearing National research Iowa EHDI program goals EHDI program progress, system development, evaluation Family stories Highlights from the EHDI Advisory Committee

Maintenance Asset Management Project -- Phase II, July 31, 2013

Expanded abstract: Iowa Department of Transportation (IA DOT) is finalizing research to streamline field inventory/inspection of culverts by Maintenance and Construction staff while maximizing the use of tablet technologies. The project began in 2011 to develop some new best practices for field staff to assist in the inventory, inspection and maintenance of assets along the roadway. The team has spent the past year working through the complexities of identifying the most appropriate tablet hardware for field data collection. A small scale deployment of tablets occurred in spring of 2013 to collect several safety related assets (culverts, signs, guardrail, and incidents). Data can be collected in disconnected or connected modes and there is an associated desktop environment where data can be viewed and queried after being synced into the master database. The development of a deployment plan and related workflow processes are underway; which will eventually feed information into IA DOTs larger asset management system and make the information available for decision making. The team is also working with the IA DOT Design Office on Computer Aided Drafting (CAD) data processing and the IA DOT Construction office with a new digital As-Built plan process to leverage the complete data life-cycle so information can be developed once and leveraged by the Maintenance staff farther along in the process.

Training Development for Pavement Preservation, RB07-011, 2013

This research project strives to help the Iowa Department of Transportation (DOT) fully achieve the full benefits of pavement preservation through training on proper selection, design, and application of pavement preservation treatments. In some cases, there is a lack of training when conducting one of these steps and the objective of applying pavement preservation techniques is compromised. Extensive amounts of literature on pavement preservation exist, but a structured approach on how to train staff in selecting, designing, and applying pavement preservation techniques is lacking. The objective of this project was to develop a training-oriented learning management system to address pavement preservation treatments (chip seals, fog seals, slurry systems, and crack seals and fills) as they are dealt with during the phases of selection, design, and construction. Early in the project, it was critical to identify the staff divisions to be trained and the treatments to be included. Through several meetings with the Iowa DOT, three staff divisions were identified: maintenance staff (in charge of selection), design staff, and construction staff. In addition, the treatments listed above were identified as the focus of the study due to their common use. Through needs analysis questionnaires and meetings, the knowledge gap and training needs of the agency were identified. The training modules developed target the gap from the results of the needs analysis. The concepting (selection) training focuses on providing the tools necessary to help make proper treatment selection. The design training focuses on providing the information necessary on the treatment materials (mostly binders and aggregates) and how to make proper material selection. Finally, the construction training focuses on providing equipment calibration procedures, inspection responsibilities, and images of poor and best practices. The research showed that it is important to train each division staff (maintenance, design, and construction) separately, as each staff division has its own needs and interests. It was also preferred that each treatment was covered on an individual basis. As a result of the research, it is recommended to evaluate the performance of pavement preservation treatments pre- and post-training continuously to compare results and verify the effectiveness of the learning management system.

Bridge Inspection Manual, TR-646, 2014

The purpose of this manual is to organize, document, and combine Iowa Department of Transportation (Iowa DOT) policies and procedures for bridge inspection practices and post-inspection recommendations so Iowa DOT personnel, local agencies, and consultants will have a readily available resource for their use. Previously, bridge inspection policies and procedures were documented by various means, making it difficult to provide consistent answers to questions regarding bridge inspection topics. This manual is intended to ensure uniformity and document best practices for inspection of Iowa’s bridges, especially as experienced inspection personnel retire.

Field Data Collection and Reporting Study, HR-377, 1997

A review of the Iowa Department of Transportation's field data collection and reporting system has been performed. Included were several systems used by the Office of Construction and Local Jurisdictions. The entire field data collection and reporting systems for asphalt cement concrete (ACC) paving, portland cement concrete (PCC) paving, and PCC structures were streamlined and computerized. The field procedures for materials acceptance were also reviewed. Best practices were identified and a method was developed to prioritize materials so transportation agencies could focus their efforts on high priority materials. Iowa State University researchers facilitated a discussion about Equal Employment Opportunity (EEO) and Affirmative Action (AA) procedures between the Office of Construction field staff and the Office of Contracts. A set of alternative procedures was developed. Later the Office of Contracts considered these alternatives as they developed new procedures that are currently being implemented. The job close-out package was reviewed and two unnecessary procedures were eliminated. Numerous other procedures were reviewed and flowcharted. Several changes have been recommended that will increase efficiency and allow staff time to be devoted to higher priority activities. It is estimated the improvements in ACC paving, PCC paving and structural concrete will by similar to three full time equivalent (FTE) positions to field construction, field materials and Office of Materials. Elimination of EEO interviews will be equivalent to one FTE position. It is estimated that other miscellaneous changes will be equivalent to at least one other FTE person. This is a total five FTEs. These are conservative estimates based on savings that are easily quantified. It is likely that total positive effect is greater when items that are difficult to quantify are considered.