Report on the Iowa Department for the Blind for the year ended June 30, 2012

Report on the Iowa Department for the Blind for the year ended June 30, 2012

Iowa Department for the Blind Performance Report, FY 2004

Agency Performance Report

Iowa Department for the Blind Performance Report, FY 2005

Agency Performance Report

Iowa Department for the Blind Performance Report, FY 2006

Agency Performance Report

Iowa Department for the Blind Performance Report, FY 2006

Agency Performance Report

Iowa Department for the Blind Performance Report, FY 2007

Agency Performance Report

Iowa Department for the Blind Performance Report, FY 2008

Agency Performance Report

Iowa Department for the Blind Performance Report, FY 2009

Agency Performance Report

Iowa Department for the Blind Performance Report, FY 2010

Agency Performance Report

Iowa Department for the Blind Performance Report, FY 2011

Agency Performance Report

Iowa Department for the Blind Performance Report, FY 2012

Agency Performance Report

Iowa Department for the Blind Performance Report, FY 2013

Agency Performance Report

Iowa Department for the Blind State Strategic Plan, July 1, 2011-June 30, 2014

The Iowa Department for the Blind is the means for persons who are blind to obtain for themselves universal accessibility and full participation as citizens in whatever roles they may choose, including roles that increase family income, create jobs, improve educational outcomes, and reduce reliance on public services.

Iowa Department for the Blind Agency Performance Plan, 2014

Agency Performance Plan

Flood-Plain and Channel Aggradation at Selected Bridge Sites in the Iowa and Skunk River Basins, Iowa, HR-350, 1996

Flood-plain and channel-aggradation rates were estimated at selected bridge sites in central and eastern Iowa using four aggradation-measurement methods. Aggradation rates were quantified at 10 bridge sites on the Iowa River upstream of Coralville Lake and at two bridge sites in the central part of Skunk River Basin. Measurement periods used to estimate average aggradation rates ranged in length from 1 to 98 years and varied among methods and sites. A direct comparison cannot be made between aggradation rates calculated using each of the four measurement methods because of differences in time periods and aggradational processes that were measured by each method.