1 resultado para Solving Problems for Evidence
Filtro por publicador
- Repository Napier (1)
- Aberdeen University (3)
- Academic Research Repository at Institute of Developing Economies (5)
- Acceda, el repositorio institucional de la Universidad de Las Palmas de Gran Canaria. España (1)
- AMS Tesi di Dottorato - Alm@DL - Università di Bologna (11)
- AMS Tesi di Laurea - Alm@DL - Università di Bologna (3)
- ArchiMeD - Elektronische Publikationen der Universität Mainz - Alemanha (1)
- Aston University Research Archive (17)
- B-Digital - Universidade Fernando Pessoa - Portugal (1)
- Biblioteca de Teses e Dissertações da USP (1)
- Biblioteca Digital da Produção Intelectual da Universidade de São Paulo (6)
- Biblioteca Digital da Produção Intelectual da Universidade de São Paulo (BDPI/USP) (123)
- Biblioteca Virtual del Sistema Sanitario Público de Andalucía (BV-SSPA), Junta de Andalucía. Consejería de Salud y Bienestar Social, Spain (1)
- BORIS: Bern Open Repository and Information System - Berna - Suiça (32)
- Brock University, Canada (7)
- Bulgarian Digital Mathematics Library at IMI-BAS (19)
- CentAUR: Central Archive University of Reading - UK (29)
- Central European University - Research Support Scheme (1)
- Cochin University of Science & Technology (CUSAT), India (2)
- Coffee Science - Universidade Federal de Lavras (1)
- Comissão Econômica para a América Latina e o Caribe (CEPAL) (7)
- Consorci de Serveis Universitaris de Catalunya (CSUC), Spain (23)
- CORA - Cork Open Research Archive - University College Cork - Ireland (1)
- Corvinus Research Archive - The institutional repository for the Corvinus University of Budapest (2)
- Dalarna University College Electronic Archive (3)
- Department of Computer Science E-Repository - King's College London, Strand, London (1)
- Digital Commons - Michigan Tech (3)
- Digital Commons at Florida International University (5)
- Digital Peer Publishing (2)
- DigitalCommons@The Texas Medical Center (5)
- DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln (12)
- Doria (National Library of Finland DSpace Services) - National Library of Finland, Finland (17)
- DRUM (Digital Repository at the University of Maryland) (1)
- Duke University (2)
- Glasgow Theses Service (1)
- Greenwich Academic Literature Archive - UK (1)
- Institute of Public Health in Ireland, Ireland (3)
- Instituto Politécnico de Castelo Branco - Portugal (1)
- Instituto Politécnico de Leiria (1)
- Instituto Politécnico de Santarém (1)
- Instituto Politécnico de Viseu (2)
- Instituto Politécnico do Porto, Portugal (6)
- Martin Luther Universitat Halle Wittenberg, Germany (1)
- Memoria Académica - FaHCE, UNLP - Argentina (6)
- Ministerio de Cultura, Spain (2)
- National Center for Biotechnology Information - NCBI (2)
- Nottingham eTheses (10)
- Open Access Repository of Association for Learning Technology (ALT) (1)
- Open University Netherlands (2)
- QSpace: Queen's University - Canada (3)
- QUB Research Portal - Research Directory and Institutional Repository for Queen's University Belfast (1)
- RCAAP - Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (1)
- Repositório Científico da Universidade de Évora - Portugal (4)
- Repositório Científico do Instituto Politécnico de Lisboa - Portugal (6)
- Repositório da Produção Científica e Intelectual da Unicamp (14)
- Repositorio de la Universidad de Cuenca (2)
- Repositório digital da Fundação Getúlio Vargas - FGV (11)
- Repositório Digital da UNIVERSIDADE DA MADEIRA - Portugal (2)
- Repositório Digital da Universidade Municipal de São Caetano do Sul - USCS (2)
- Repositório Institucional da Universidade de Brasília (1)
- Repositório Institucional da Universidade Estadual de São Paulo - UNESP (1)
- Repositório Institucional UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista "Julio de Mesquita Filho" (58)
- Repositorio Institucional Universidad de Medellín (3)
- RUN (Repositório da Universidade Nova de Lisboa) - FCT (Faculdade de Cienecias e Technologia), Universidade Nova de Lisboa (UNL), Portugal (8)
- Scielo Saúde Pública - SP (2)
- Scielo Uruguai (1)
- Scottish Institute for Research in Economics (SIRE) (SIRE), United Kingdom (2)
- Universidad de Alicante (4)
- Universidad del Rosario, Colombia (6)
- Universidad Politécnica de Madrid (19)
- Universidade de Madeira (1)
- Universidade do Minho (12)
- Universidade dos Açores - Portugal (1)
- Universidade Federal do Pará (3)
- Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Norte (UFRN) (6)
- Universidade Metodista de São Paulo (3)
- Universitat de Girona, Spain (3)
- Universitätsbibliothek Kassel, Universität Kassel, Germany (3)
- Université de Lausanne, Switzerland (15)
- Université de Montréal (2)
- Université de Montréal, Canada (8)
- Université Laval Mémoires et thèses électroniques (1)
- University of Connecticut - USA (1)
- University of Michigan (14)
- University of Queensland eSpace - Australia (294)
- University of Southampton, United Kingdom (1)
- University of Washington (1)
Resumo:
BACKGROUND: Despite the progress over recent decades in developing community mental health services internationally, many people still receive treatment and care in institutional settings. Those most likely to reside longest in these facilities have the most complex mental health problems and are at most risk of potential abuses of care and exploitation. This study aimed to develop an international, standardised toolkit to assess the quality of care in longer term hospital and community based mental health units, including the degree to which human rights, social inclusion and autonomy are promoted. METHOD: The domains of care included in the toolkit were identified from a systematic literature review, international expert Delphi exercise, and review of care standards in ten European countries. The draft toolkit comprised 154 questions for unit managers. Inter-rater reliability was tested in 202 units across ten countries at different stages of deinstitutionalisation and development of community mental health services. Exploratory factor analysis was used to corroborate the allocation of items to domains. Feedback from those using the toolkit was collected about its usefulness and ease of completion. RESULTS: The toolkit had excellent inter-rater reliability and few items with narrow spread of response. Unit managers found the content highly relevant and were able to complete it in around 90 minutes. Minimal refinement was required and the final version comprised 145 questions assessing seven domains of care. CONCLUSIONS: Triangulation of qualitative and quantitative evidence directed the development of a robust and comprehensive international quality assessment toolkit for units in highly variable socioeconomic and political contexts